france is fucking retarded

Started by billy, May 20, 2010 12:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kött

#60
Quote from: shura
Quote from: Middle-Aged Old-Manyou're saying "oh the ruler only doesn't like it because it's non-french" which is claiming that his argument is wrong because of his circumstance.
lmao this makes no fuckin sense


Quoteeven if that is true it doesn't make them wrong so your attack is irrelevant. even if deep down the ruler only dislikes the burka because it is non-french, that isn't the argument he's making so your point has no merit other than an attack on the person
i never once said sarkozy argument was wrong and i didn't try to take away sarkozy's credibility by pointing out some sort of flaw or anything. an ad-hominem is a logical fallacy. what i wrote is a justification of why somebody doesn't like something. even if it isn't true, it isn't a logical fallacy. you clearly dont know what an ad hominem circumstance is and probably just said it to try and sound smart
otomorroe alcohjol is a bad motherfue´k´´cer...
:3

Necronomitr0n

kot u must be high on a mad blunt of weed
<+fawx> im trying to animate a dick coming out of a toaster how do i go on about doing this
<~rtil> well fawx what you would do is delete the fla and do something productive instead

<+ansel> i lure children into my van with candy and then i read them passages from 'the origin of species'
<%ropesnake> billy con ends with billy raping his cat
<+billymonks> FUCK YOU BUG

<~rtil> ya one time i gave this hobo some cat food and he ate it like the animal he is it pleased me

DrRumack

Quote from: shura
Quote from: Middle-Aged Old-Man
hey nice ad hominem circumstantial

an ad-hominem circumstantial is when you try to prove that someone's argument is wrong by showing that the person who said it is not credible. this is usually done by belittling the other person, or bringing up some sort of character flaw that isn't really relevant to the argument. which i did not do.

a good example of an ad-hominem circumstantial would be:  "taylors opinion on islam is wrong becuase he's a dipshit who thinks atheism is a religion"


lmfao

<Naza> i hate penis exect mine
<Tyler Naugle> JOKE  TIME w/ JOKEOB BRECK
<+pantsman> you have yet to show me any applicable sign of intelligence yet scrib...
<HatsuneMiku> the pings and timeouts of jacob breck
<dilly> the tba will look up and cry "save us!".... and i'll look down and whisper .... "h"
Quote from: stealth trollwhat's up with you not sucking dicks like the faggot you are
<+fluffkomix> mrscriblam has added you as a friend
<+fluffkomix> ignore

<+mrscriblam> lmao

Jeinu

there are so many security risks this could potentially cause. if he doesn't take the initiative to ban it, then it will be exploited. people who aren't even women, or even muslim will exploit it.

and i don't think it's fair if someone can look at me and i cannot look at them

that's just weird

lenko

Quote from: Kottotomorroe alcohjol is a bad motherfue´k´´cer...

kott very rarely makes sense when sober but wow
<emanhattan> i remember pingu ice cream
<emanhattan> it was a better time
<emanhattan> when the penguins were cold and delicious
<emanhattan> and i knew i was gonna be
<emanhattan> consequence free

shura

taylor if you really truly honestly believe what i said was an ad hominem circumstancial then ok keep thinking that im not going to stop you. i dont want to keep arguing forever over something so gay when it's obvious you dont know the definition, and wont ever admit you're wrong no matter how many times i spell it out for you

billy

Quote from: vegeta
Quote from: Kottotomorroe alcohjol is a bad motherfue´k´´cer...

kott very rarely makes sense when sober but wow

trent bortknob

Quote from: shurataylor if you really truly honestly believe what i said was an ad hominem circumstancial then ok keep thinking that im not going to stop you. i dont want to keep arguing forever over something so gay when it's obvious you dont know the definition, and wont ever admit you're wrong no matter how many times i spell it out for you
i admit that it is a stupid thing to get into a debate about, but this is exactly why you suck at debating. when you cant support yourself enough you just pull out some stupid insult and then try to end the discussion. you're never going to win a debate that way

shura

i can support my argument just fine. im sorry you dont know what an ad hominem circumstancial is. there's really nothing else i can do i already explained it lmao. if you dont get it then ok im not gonna waste anymore time on this

MarcK

Quote from: Middle-Aged Old-ManSasha if you dont feel like arguing anymore i win by default HAHA YOU LOSE I WIN

Mew_User

I feel like my posts in this thread are disappearing, and with them a piece of my soul.

jjjjjjjjjj

mastahlg (2:05:17 AM): i only go on tba to make very opinionated statements that sometimes make people angry
mastahlg (2:05:21 AM): i just thougght you should know that
JSeed117 (2:05:40 AM): its ok i only go to tba to post ironically and post WACKY image macros for no reason
mastahlg (2:06:28 AM): yeah

Kött

#72
Quote from: Billy
Quote from: vegeta
Quote from: Kottotomorroe alcohjol is a bad motherfue´k´´cer...

kott very rarely makes sense when sober but wow
Ahahaha, oh man... Actually even I have no idea what I was trying to say... just drinking the already opened beer leftovers and clearing my trash of vomit. Yepp... That guy left pretty early...
Oh, right! By saying that this French politician banned the burka because he didn't like it Sasha pointed out the fact that this law is based on reasons of racism and her argument could therefore be seen as an argumentum ad hominem. In this case, though, the fact that this man may just be acting for the reason of racism it's relevant to the topic, which is why it's not entirely an ad hominem and shouldn't just be ignored. You are both right but instead of sticking to the topic, you try to bash each other because of irrelevant formalities and that is the reason why every decent argumentation topic on this board gets ruined after less than two pages. It's kinda sad...

Ok, now get as wasted as I was yesterday and try to express a similar thought in a foreign language
:3

trent bortknob

Quote from: shurai can support my argument just fine. im sorry you dont know what an ad hominem circumstancial is. there's really nothing else i can do i already explained it lmao. if you dont get it then ok im not gonna waste anymore time on this
i definitely do know what ad hominem circumstantial and if you really didnt use it then you just need to learn how to articulate yourself better

rtil

this was in the news today, figured it was worth sharing since it seems relevant
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CN...;show_article=1

QuoteSaudi Arabia\\\'s religious police have arrested 10 "emo" women for allegedly causing a disturbance in a coffee shop, Al-Yaum newspaper reported on Saturday.

The religious police then called their parents to come and collect the women, and to sign pledges that the girls would not repeat their ostensibly offensive un-Islamic behaviour and dress.

While Saudi women normally must appear in public shrouded by all-black abayas and headscarves, some daringly open their abayas in places such as malls and coffee shops to reveal more trendy outfits underneath.

Mew_User

Taylor and Sasha need to stop flirting in public.

trent bortknob

allah doesn't approve of your fashion sense

creamcorn


Clock-Ninja

I hate france, all they do is speak french.

zhicago


sevv: btw dude you dropped your wacky-colored paste-on nose here i'll give it back to you

|