Iowa Caucus Final Results

Started by notorious, January 4, 2008 03:23 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Nadroj0711

http://www.dehp.net/candidate/

hey this is a pretty good candidates test

also, rtil where does ron paul stand on net neutrality?
'ello gov'na

Nadroj0711

and what about drilling the alaskan national wildlife refuge?
'ello gov'na

psi43


Nadroj0711

'ello gov'na

rtil

he supports net neutrality and does not want to monitor the internet. i mean why wouldn't he - it's thanks to the internet his campaign has come this far.

http://www.issues2000.org/2008/Ron_Paul_Energy_+_Oil.htm

i'm guessing if you're some sort of wildlife nut ron paul isn't your favorite guy. i find there are more important issues at hand than ANWR drilling. someday we're going to have to anyway, if we rely on oil as much as we do in the future. unless we want to stop driving cars, using electricity and manufacturing products.

Nadroj0711

I'm not a wildlife nut, it just seemed weird
anyway, when i took the poll it said he disagreed with me on net neutrality
and i said i SUPPORT it
'ello gov'na

W.A.C.

Quote from: Nadroj0711http://www.dehp.net/candidate/

hey this is a pretty good candidates test

also, rtil where does ron paul stand on net neutrality?

[LINK]

If that site was 100% accurate, Obama would've been 2nd place for me, not Hilary. According to this site, Obama is against torture. Not only that but he voted yes on factoring global warming into federal project planning. Because of that, he probably supports Kyoto. Maybe I should look more into Obama.

Nadroj0711

sorry man i didn't realize you'd already posted that poll site!!
'ello gov'na

rtil

the kyoto protocol is a bunch of meandering bullshit. it's a bunch of guidelines that the UN can't enforce because they're useless. we're already developing hydrogen cars and diverting every day objects to green sources of energy. the US and China didn't sign it for good reasons - China opens a new coal power plant once every 15 minutes. they're going through an industrial revolution and they're not going to exchange it for appeasing a bunch of diplomats under the guise of global warming, and the US already acknowledges the treaty is a pile of meaningless bureaucracy.

Gavin

the UN is fucking worthless


im really fucking gay

thanks to sinister for the wonderful avatar

Nadroj0711

anyway here's what I got after going back and changong the things i didn't really know about to unknown/other
'ello gov'na

rtil

that site is not 100% accurate i believe. paul supports net neutrality. he also supports civil unions but not marriage. a civil union would grant homosexuals the same benefits , marriage (in this country's roots) is a christian tradition and there are too many of them to ever hand it over to them. frankly i don't think it's a big deal

Gavin

if homosexuals are allowed civil unions but still DEMAND the word marriage then that would be so silly!


i think the whole gay marriage thing is a shock value thing

HEY WERE GAY wouldnt it be funny if we got married?
ya man! hyuck hyuck


YOU COULDNT ANYWAY ITS AGAINST THE LAW

YOURE NOT THE BOSS OF US
im really fucking gay

thanks to sinister for the wonderful avatar

W.A.C.

I personally think states should be able to decide on whether or not gay marriage should be legal in those specific states. I don't support gay marriage but I really don't blame homosexuals for wanting to get married.

rtil

#34
that's what ron paul would want. see i don't understand why more people like ron paul - because his stances on some issues are irrelevant, because HE doesn't want the federal government to make those decisions FOR you. he wants your STATE to make those kinds of decisions. for some reason, america is too thick-headed and concerned about things like "is my candidate an evangelical christian?!?!?!"

Gavin

Quote from: rtil"is my candidate an evangelical christian?!?!?!"


,lmfao
im really fucking gay

thanks to sinister for the wonderful avatar

W.A.C.

The reason why I'm not going to vote for Ron Paul in the primaries is because I disagree with quite a bit of his issues.

Nadroj0711

so what republicans do you like, Mr. Liberal???
'ello gov'na

rtil

Quote from: W.A.C.The reason why I\\\'m not going to vote for Ron Paul in the primaries is because I disagree with quite a bit of his issues.
but you\\\'re missing my point. why does it even matter? if he was elected, his stances on the issues would not effect you on a federal level, because he\\\'d let your state decide, which would give you more of a choice on the matter. he\\\'s the ONLY candidate who would do that - republican OR democrat.

i mean technically speaking, the guy cares more about you as an individual than anyone else running for president.

W.A.C.

Quote from: Nadroj0711so what republicans do you like, Mr. Liberal???
Ron Paul is the only Republican running for president that I like. If Ron Paul became president, I wouldn't mind. As for the other Republicans running for president, I would be super angry if they won the election.

Quote from: rtilbut you're missing my point. why does it even matter? if he was elected, his stances on the issues would not effect you on a federal level, because he'd let your state decide, which would give you more of a choice on the matter. he's the ONLY candidate who would do that - republican OR democrat.
To be perfectly honest, I haven't truly decided on who I'm going to vote for yet. Even though Dennis seems like the person I would want in office, I'll still consider other candidates.

Quote from: rtili mean technically speaking, the guy cares more about you as an individual than anyone else running for president.
Do I think he cares more about me as an individual than anyone else running for president? For the Republican side, definitely. As for the Democratic side, I'm not exactly sure. I really like the idea of universal healthcare and Dennis Kucinich's plan for it seems like a really good idea. Feel free to tell me if Dennis's plan for universal healthcare seems like a bad idea.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOB0f3I1AXk&

I also agree with Dennis's immigration stance far more than Ron Paul's view on illegal immigrants. I also consider Ron Paul's "end birthright citizenship" idea to be unconstitutional. I do admit that I don't entirely agree with Dennis. I support having secure borders where he doesn't seem to be in support of borders.

Dennis's Stance on Immigration:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnLyHi2TdhM&

Ron Paul's Stance on Immigration:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2T-iJKwskH4

|