Anyone want to see Tron Legacy?

[funzop]

ye i wanna see it who wants 2 come

[Mew_User]

I will go with you nonzop. Pick me up at the usual spot

[GhostingFish]

I will go with you nonzop. Pick me up at the usual spot

[Thor]

Avoiding spoilers:

1. I loved it, overall.
2. Don't go in expecting a groundbreaking or deep plot
3. It does get a bit lethargic towards the middle/end, but I think that's because of action sequences that fill up the beginning
4. Looking back at the plot, pacing, everything, etc. I can't really think of anything that I would have done differently. Maybe a little more conflict at the end. Overall, the plot is logical (NOT completely predictable), characters are consistent, and Olivia Wilde is very cute :3

[edit] my mini review is on my blag, but the tl;dr version is up there ^^

Otherwise, http://jgchan.blogspot.com/2010/12/tron-le...ini-review.html [/edit]

[Mew_User]

It was good.

[jjjjjjjjjj]

well my review for tron is that it is the same review as avatar and that is that it is defiantly a movie

[logen]

yeah it was great i really liked how the main char shoved his dick up the blondies ass and made her drink his digital cu- oh wait wrong movie

[rtil]

it was good. i would've thrown out a couple one-liners and the middle could have used less explaining and more showing, but it was so visually pleasing that i don't really care that much.  the ending left more to the imagination though and i liked that

[Mew_User]

yeah it was great i really liked how the main char shoved his dick up the blondies ass and made her drink his digital cu- oh wait wrong movie

Will Pron Legacy be in 3D?

[RichChap]

It wasn't really that special of a movie. I thought it would be entertaining for the visuals/soundtrack, and for that I was pleased. I wasn't expecting the plot to be amazing, and to be honest i was a little underwhelmed by that.

I guess I got exactly what I expected. There were a lot of flaws, but at least it wasn't boring. A lot better than avatar in terms of the overall experience (I make this connection because avatar came out around the same time last year and was the big movie that everyone hyped), but I guess this wasn't really as hyped as avatar anyway. My friends and I went solely because the soundtrack was by Daft Punk and we thought that would make the experience. It definitely did, and when the movie is released on dvd/blu-ray I will definitely buy it again to check out the special features and stuff, but the only reason I would go back to watch the movie again would be to re-watch the "derezzed" scene (the awesome action scene when daft punk was djing.)

Definitely worth watching at least once.

Also, I saw it in 2D because I've never enjoyed watching a movie in 3D before, but I feel like this time the 3D might have been better since there seems to be much more of an interest in seeing this movie in 3D, so the theaters don't put a lot of effort into screening the 2D version. The quality of the theatre i saw it in is usually pretty decent but this time I could hear the projector clicking, and not a lot of other people were in the same theater as me and my friends even though we saw it at 7:00 on a saturday night.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6Afc2uzw4g

[FlamingoPudding]

I watched the 1982 version again yesterday. I hope they will try to capture the surreal vibe of it, instead of soaking it in stable CGI sauerkraut.  There's just something about the way the colors bounced off the faces and the characters shaking over the circuits.
I guess they won't though... It will still be a cool film I reckon, I mean...Daft Punk is doing the sound-track for crying out loud.

[Fuzz]

I watched the 1982 version again yesterday. I hope they will try to capture the surreal vibe of it, instead of soaking it in stable CGI sauerkraut.  There's just something about the way the colors bounced off the faces and the characters shaking over the circuits.
I guess they won't though... It will still be a cool film I reckon, I mean...Daft Punk is doing the sound-track for crying out loud.

The way the special effects were applied to Tron was amazingly difficult.

"Most of the scenes, backgrounds and visual effects in the film were created using more traditional techniques and a unique process known as "backlit animation".[3] In this process, live-action scenes inside the computer world were filmed in black-and-white on an entirely black set, printed on large format high-contrast film, then colorized with photographic and rotoscopic techniques to give them a "technological" feel.[4] With multiple layers of high-contrast, large format positives and negatives, this process required truckloads of sheet film and a workload even greater than that of a conventional cel-animated feature. In addition, the varying quality and age of the film layers caused differing brightness levels for the backlit effects from frame to frame, explaining why glowing outlines and circuit traces tended to flicker in the original film. Due to its difficulty and cost, this process would never be repeated for another feature film."

[ZekeySpaceyLizard]

i liked that the warden from superjail was in it

[GhostingFish]

I watched the 1982 version again yesterday. I hope they will try to capture the surreal vibe of it, instead of soaking it in stable CGI sauerkraut.  There's just something about the way the colors bounced off the faces and the characters shaking over the circuits.
I guess they won't though... It will still be a cool film I reckon, I mean...Daft Punk is doing the sound-track for crying out loud.

The way the special effects were applied to Tron was amazingly difficult.

"Most of the scenes, backgrounds and visual effects in the film were created using more traditional techniques and a unique process known as "backlit animation".[3] In this process, live-action scenes inside the computer world were filmed in black-and-white on an entirely black set, printed on large format high-contrast film, then colorized with photographic and rotoscopic techniques to give them a "technological" feel.[4] With multiple layers of high-contrast, large format positives and negatives, this process required truckloads of sheet film and a workload even greater than that of a conventional cel-animated feature. In addition, the varying quality and age of the film layers caused differing brightness levels for the backlit effects from frame to frame, explaining why glowing outlines and circuit traces tended to flicker in the original film. Due to its difficulty and cost, this process would never be repeated for another feature film."

Did you watch the documentary on tron? Cause that was some difficult shit. like over 100 layers per frame n stuff....

I watched the 1982 version again yesterday. I hope they will try to capture the surreal vibe of it, instead of soaking it in stable CGI sauerkraut.  There's just something about the way the colors bounced off the faces and the characters shaking over the circuits.
I guess they won't though... It will still be a cool film I reckon, I mean...Daft Punk is doing the sound-track for crying out loud.

The way the special effects were applied to Tron was amazingly difficult.

"Most of the scenes, backgrounds and visual effects in the film were created using more traditional techniques and a unique process known as "backlit animation".[3] In this process, live-action scenes inside the computer world were filmed in black-and-white on an entirely black set, printed on large format high-contrast film, then colorized with photographic and rotoscopic techniques to give them a "technological" feel.[4] With multiple layers of high-contrast, large format positives and negatives, this process required truckloads of sheet film and a workload even greater than that of a conventional cel-animated feature. In addition, the varying quality and age of the film layers caused differing brightness levels for the backlit effects from frame to frame, explaining why glowing outlines and circuit traces tended to flicker in the original film. Due to its difficulty and cost, this process would never be repeated for another feature film."

Did you watch the documentary on tron? Cause that was some difficult shit. like over 100 layers per frame n stuff....

[BluPhoenix]

I watched the 1982 version again yesterday. I hope they will try to capture the surreal vibe of it, instead of soaking it in stable CGI sauerkraut.  There's just something about the way the colors bounced off the faces and the characters shaking over the circuits.
I guess they won't though... It will still be a cool film I reckon, I mean...Daft Punk is doing the sound-track for crying out loud.

The way the special effects were applied to Tron was amazingly difficult.

"Most of the scenes, backgrounds and visual effects in the film were created using more traditional techniques and a unique process known as "backlit animation".[3] In this process, live-action scenes inside the computer world were filmed in black-and-white on an entirely black set, printed on large format high-contrast film, then colorized with photographic and rotoscopic techniques to give them a "technological" feel.[4] With multiple layers of high-contrast, large format positives and negatives, this process required truckloads of sheet film and a workload even greater than that of a conventional cel-animated feature. In addition, the varying quality and age of the film layers caused differing brightness levels for the backlit effects from frame to frame, explaining why glowing outlines and circuit traces tended to flicker in the original film. Due to its difficulty and cost, this process would never be repeated for another feature film."

Did you watch the documentary on tron? Cause that was some difficult shit. like over 100 layers per frame n stuff....

I watched the 1982 version again yesterday. I hope they will try to capture the surreal vibe of it, instead of soaking it in stable CGI sauerkraut.  There's just something about the way the colors bounced off the faces and the characters shaking over the circuits.
I guess they won't though... It will still be a cool film I reckon, I mean...Daft Punk is doing the sound-track for crying out loud.

The way the special effects were applied to Tron was amazingly difficult.

"Most of the scenes, backgrounds and visual effects in the film were created using more traditional techniques and a unique process known as "backlit animation".[3] In this process, live-action scenes inside the computer world were filmed in black-and-white on an entirely black set, printed on large format high-contrast film, then colorized with photographic and rotoscopic techniques to give them a "technological" feel.[4] With multiple layers of high-contrast, large format positives and negatives, this process required truckloads of sheet film and a workload even greater than that of a conventional cel-animated feature. In addition, the varying quality and age of the film layers caused differing brightness levels for the backlit effects from frame to frame, explaining why glowing outlines and circuit traces tended to flicker in the original film. Due to its difficulty and cost, this process would never be repeated for another feature film."

Did you watch the documentary on tron? Cause that was some difficult shit. like over 100 layers per frame n stuff....

what the F*** is this!!

[GhostingFish]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsGCcPyj7B4

Watch all the parts.


This part is about the graphics that were used in Tron.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IH2cJ3VSCK4&feature=related

[CVG]

Saw it for xmas and was very entertained by the whole thing. Its one of those movie you need to watch again to catch all the little extra details they put in (like the tiny pixel icecubes in the drink).