Kick-Ass

Started by jjjjjjjjjj, November 11, 2009 04:48 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jjjjjjjjjj

The trailer finally came out

http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer/kick-ass/teaser-trailer

Here is the more bloody uncut trailer of the movie that was recorded with a vry bad cam
http://teaser-trailer.com/2009/01/kick-ass.html


Might be good I'm hoping

Casey Pixmintro

Looks like it'll be pretty good
<@jjjjjjjjjj_Seed> IXINTRO FROM IXINTRO ENTERPRISES GOES MAD WITH HIS NEW FOUND WEALTH AND KILLS A HOOKER
<+RobHalford> hi my name is ix and I wanna get intro you
I'm a stupid moron with an ugly face and big butt and my butt smells and I like to kiss my own butt

Orangebeef

help newgrounds kick extra ass!!!

Daveb0t

looks like shit won't watch


jjjjjjjjjj


rtil

i miss movie posters that were painted

jjjjjjjjjj

At least it's not WHITE BACKGROUND RED TEXT THE MAIN CHARACTER'S FACE that most movie posters do now

rtil

at the end of the day they're all mediocre photoshop jobs

rtil


ZekeySpaceyLizard

Quote from: Malhonestly i find cliche photoshop posters better than really cheesy star warsesque painting posters but maybe i just havent seen enough painted ones

wow

billy

and that's why they make photoshop ones for $100 now

cuz idiots can't tell the difference!

trent bortknob

Quote from: Zekey
Quote from: Malhonestly i find cliche photoshop posters better than really cheesy star warsesque painting posters but maybe i just havent seen enough painted ones

wow
yeah seriously kian what the hell look at thjat poster

that's definitely a whole lot more appealing

texas

well it depends on the movie
if its some fantasy epic then a painting is appropriate
while if its like Crank or something some gritty photo of jason statham aiming a gun makes a lot more sense than a collage of characters
there are a lot of movies that it wouldnt fit for
including the movie in this topic

tmk

I think you're sort of missing the point by relating all painted posters to the star wars type






painting gives you a lot more freedom than photomanipulation. would any of these posters be much improved by a lens flare, explosion or that hideous brown tint that's become so popular?

ZekeySpaceyLizard

Quote from: Mali still think that all of those would be better movie posters as photos


rtil

some people just have bad taste

billy

Quote from: rtilsome people just have bad taste
sarcastic remark

rtil

Quote from: Billy
Quote from: rtilsome people just have bad taste
sarcastic remark

psi43

Quote from: Mali still think that all of those would be better movie posters as photos but i guess im the only one
not that they arent amazing paintings

except for star wars, army of darkness and metropolis, i actually agree.

It's not like movie posters that are photoshopped together are better, it's just that for some movies it just fits a lot better.

If a movie is really bad though, not even a painted poster would help much. Big Momma's House is a very good example of a movie poster that would've looked horrible if it was painted. (Not saying the movie was either good or bad, it's just a nice example)