modern warfares 3

[Sef]

played it a little at BluPhoenix's house, pretty uninteresting

[ZennyPLUS]

Modern Kitchenware 3: Glory of Martha Stewart

[Jon]

to me it literally looks like the exact same as modern warfare 2. incredibly boring

[BluPhoenix]

its pretty great if you dont think about it

[Necronomitr0n]

its pretty great if you dont think about it

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand hey this is exactly what activision has been relying on for the past 4 years

[BluPhoenix]

the joke???

[Gladius]

if they had just changed the hud activision wouldn't be taking half as much flak for recycling content

[BluPhoenix]

except the fact this is their 7th game on the same engine

[Gladius]

but the backlash over the 5th and 6th was basically nothing

they just got lazy with the hud/menus and made it really obvious

ultimately it had little to no effect on sales though

[rtil]

the backlash comes from people who were dumb enough to buy it all the while knowing it was pretty much the same game

obviously it doesn't bother enough people as it sells like hotcakes but it's the king of casual shooters, everyone should know this by now

i've never bought a CoD game so i've spared myself the trouble

[Sapphire]

Black Ops FFA Win In 2 Minutes - Generic Geoff Gameplay Commentary

I lost it.

[BluPhoenix]

i've never bought a CoD game so i've spared myself the trouble

cod4 is actually worth it because it has what mw2&3 dont: a really good single player campaign and arguably some of the best climaxes/special missions ever
Call of Duty 4 Epilogue - "Mile High Club" on Veteran

that with the multiplayer's weapon system and its perks werent terrifically unbalanced (dual 1887s)
MW2 | Akimbo Model 1887 Post Patch (Further Range)

[Gladius]

the backlash comes from people who were dumb enough to buy it all the while knowing it was pretty much the same game

i disagree, for the most part i've seen the flak coming from loyalists of battlefield, tf2 or other games. at this point cod fans mostly know what they're getting into and just want more of the same.

[rtil]

the backlash comes from people who were dumb enough to buy it all the while knowing it was pretty much the same game

i disagree, for the most part i've seen the flak coming from loyalists of battlefield, tf2 or other games. at this point cod fans mostly know what they're getting into and just want more of the same.

you do see a lot of that, but if you don't think there aren't a lot of people who bought the game and still complain you're kidding yourself

i've never bought a CoD game so i've spared myself the trouble

cod4 is actually worth it because it has what mw2&3 dont: a really good single player campaign and arguably some of the best climaxes/special missions ever
Call of Duty 4 Epilogue - "Mile High Club" on Veteran

that with the multiplayer's weapon system and its perks werent terrifically unbalanced (dual 1887s)
MW2 | Akimbo Model 1887 Post Patch (Further Range)

the thing is though is that i don't buy a game for $60 so i can play a good campaign that lasts 8 hours. that's not worth my money. so when i buy a fps, i buy it with the intention of playing hours and hours of solid multiplayer.

cod multiplayer is retarded. killstreak rewards, horrible balance, spawncamping galore, lack of variety. battlefield has and always will trump cod in multiplayer

[Sinitron]

everyone knows COUNTER-STRIKE 1.6 is the real man's online shooter

[Gladius]

cod multiplayer is retarded. killstreak rewards, horrible balance, spawncamping galore, lack of variety.

despite all of this, it's still damn good fun. and i think battlefield is well known for having its share of these issues, and even some worse ones. in particular i think vehicle camping is awful. why waste your own time? then there's ejectors, all the teamplay-oriented weapons and gear nobody uses, etc. etc...

[cipher]

cod multiplayer is retarded. killstreak rewards, horrible balance, spawncamping galore, lack of variety.

despite all of this, it's still damn good fun. and i think battlefield is well known for having its share of these issues, and even some worse ones. in particular i think vehicle camping is awful. why waste your own time? then there's ejectors, all the teamplay-oriented weapons and gear nobody uses, etc. etc...

The thing is though you're going to find this kind of issue in all kinds of games. Camping vehicles or spawns, just going around trying to get the most points and ignoring the actual objective, etc. I think that problem lies much more in the game playing community than in the game(s) itself. There's only so much the devs can do to get rid of these things

[Gladius]

that's my point. i know both series are flawed, but cod provides fast-paced, involving and accessible action without most of the aggravation and tedium that arises from bf's scale, and for that i prefer it, even though i lost interest in the multiplayer aspect a while back. but if you enjoy bf, so be it, just acknowledge that it has problems as well.

[rtil]

never said bf was perfect - i said it was a superior multiplayer experience. it's impossible to even compare the two though because cod is so linear in its gameplay.

[rtil]

also