Step 1: Say it's not happening!http://www.climatechangefraud.com/content/view/1917/218/ (http://www.climatechangefraud.com/content/view/1917/218/)
Step 2: Say it IS happening, but it's no big deal!http://www.climate-change.me.uk/html/the_i...anthropoge.html (http://www.climate-change.me.uk/html/the_increase_is_not_anthropoge.html)
Step 3: Say it IS a big deal, but it's out of our control!http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008...e.greenpolitics (http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/jul/16/climatechange.greenpolitics)
Step 4: Say it IS in our control, but FUCK YOUhttp://news.scotsman.com/uk/Polar-warming-...-by-.4648178.jp (http://news.scotsman.com/uk/Polar-warming-39caused-by-.4648178.jp)
QuoteSCIENTISTS claim they have finally proved human behaviour is responsible for warming at the north and south poles.
Dr Peter Stott, head of climate monitoring at the Met Office, who was also involved in the research, said: "In both polar regions the observed warming can only be reproduced in our models by including human influences – natural forces alone are not enough."
Dr Alexey Karpechko, author of the report published in Nature Geoscience, said he hoped the research would help persuade sceptics.
...
Previous studies have observed rises in Arctic and Antarctic temperatures but have not formally attributed the changes to human influence, partly due to poor observation data.
Last year, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said there was not enough evidence to be sure humans were responsible for temperature rises at Antarctica.
Dr Richard Dixon, director of WWF Scotland, said the report was "significant", adding: "It's good to get this sort of proof in two of the most crucial regions that are being affected most quickly. It's sometimes quite hard to prove things that are quite obvious."
He compared it to efforts to show that lung cancer was caused by smoking, which took decades to prove.
Step 5: Deny any link between smoking and lung cancer!
too long didnt read.