thebackalleys

archives => delicious => Topic started by: zomfgbie on April 13, 2008 12:11 PM

Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 13, 2008 12:11 PM
cause i couldnt find the old thread
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Sonni on April 13, 2008 12:26 PM
Hmm...
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 13, 2008 12:35 PM
Quote from: FreekCcause i couldnt find the old thread
he had bad grammar and spelling but overall I thought he was nice and I was glad he enjoyed my movie.

oh and to make it seem like im not totally harping on you heres a review from that same movie that I found to be even stupider. I cropped it badly apparently.

Also what the fuck Kokiriko Bushi is a good song talk about bad musical preferences
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: anigen on April 13, 2008 01:18 PM
i really hope this one is a joke because if it isnt ive lost all respect for mindchamber

for a flash that i made in like ten minutes while talking to tomamoto: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/434469 (http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/434469)

Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 13, 2008 01:24 PM
it came across jokingly, to me.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 13, 2008 01:55 PM
hes been a real bitch towards spam movies lately so i dont know

(im pending revelations about some big conspiracy about how he always acts like a dick towards spam though)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 13, 2008 01:56 PM
most of the admins are dicks about everything they don't like, especially bob now
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 13, 2008 01:58 PM
Bob has perky tits.

I like that in a man.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: anigen on April 13, 2008 02:02 PM
Quote from: Squeefhes been a real bitch towards spam movies lately so i dont know

this would probably explain it

i dont know, i guess hes under the perception that once you've made some silly spam shit you're instantly doomed to stagnation and becoming shitty

what he doesnt get is that people like zsl and rtil made spam and they're fine animators. maybe i'll prove him wrong when i make something
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 13, 2008 06:17 PM
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi28.tinypic.com%2F23ualo0.png&hash=bb841ea95b2bc5c650b6678be41c5989346a011f)

(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi32.tinypic.com%2F2r2ynhx.png&hash=9238bf7e8bbc9172b44029f527f247b9a5721093)
yee haw
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: psi43 on April 13, 2008 08:17 PM
anigen why do you submit stuff like that anyways
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 13, 2008 08:54 PM
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg144.imageshack.us%2Fimg144%2F8184%2Freview3qv4.png&hash=f9d89a4ae74e74ae3dade54137260cefbcefc292)

I copied and pasted that review from a review on Waterlollies and it's marked helpful

hahahahahahaa
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 13, 2008 09:00 PM
im beginning to understand the appeal of making spam submissions

goldmines.

Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Crabarms on April 13, 2008 09:32 PM
what a loser hahaha
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 13, 2008 09:53 PM
ALL FLASH MUST HAVE A VERY COMPLEX STORY
-Kurekeme-sama
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: psi43 on April 13, 2008 10:23 PM
Ok, this isn't a stupid review but a stupid response:

(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thebackalleys.com%2Fok%2Fpublic%2Freview.png&hash=6cd92cbe15fba40ce42e7d4cdf63369d426918f8)

I wrote a huge review and this guy made a fucking gay response.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 13, 2008 10:36 PM
Quote from: anigen
Quote from: Squeefhes been a real bitch towards spam movies lately so i dont know

this would probably explain it

i dont know, i guess hes under the perception that once you've made some silly spam shit you're instantly doomed to stagnation and becoming shitty

what he doesnt get is that people like zsl and rtil made spam and they're fine animators. maybe i'll prove him wrong when i make something
mindchamber's a fuckin dipshit when it comes to spam

i mean he used to be friends with guys like sinista and zero but stopped talking to them once goldencat released that abusing NG book. its like he blamed us all for something one member did.

it sucks too because i bet mindchamber would be cool with us if he wasn't made biased by stamper and johnnyutah's viewpoints. i remember a few years back mindchamber nearly made a dailytoon. and tom says he would probably be interested in helping us with an experimental series if we started one
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: fish on April 13, 2008 11:20 PM
...
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 13, 2008 11:26 PM
QuoteI wrote a huge review and this guy made a fucking gay response.

I saw that earlier and loled, i was going to leave a review myself but numerous people have already said what i was going too.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 14, 2008 12:00 AM
Quote from: f0di mean he used to be friends with guys like sinista and zero but stopped talking to them once goldencat released that abusing NG book. its like he blamed us all for something one member did.

it sucks too because i bet mindchamber would be cool with us if he wasn't made biased by stamper and johnnyutah's viewpoints. i remember a few years back mindchamber nearly made a dailytoon. and tom says he would probably be interested in helping us with an experimental series if we started one
That is pretty fucking retarded what happened to thinking for yourself huh? And I mean jesus you read AAEN and you can plainly see that Goldencat made it I mean it's HIS name that is plastered all over the place. Oh well.

That would be great if you talked mindchamber into helping out with the experimental series, that would bolster the idea that it is a real series and not "spam vote 2 without watching" ya know. That would help out in all kinds of aspects not just from NG voters but from the good (but way too anti-spam) NG producers. Hmm.

Oh well.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Halcion on April 14, 2008 12:33 AM
mc has lost a bit of his sense of humor towards "spam" flashes. maybe its just the general NG public harassing mods and admins about them.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 14, 2008 04:59 AM
Much like Nicole im more of a response kinda guy

I DONT TAKE DBZ ITS KING OF FIGHTERS!

AND I ONLY USED 3 DBZ SFX WICH ARE

GHEY

GHEYER

GHEYEST
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 14, 2008 05:21 AM
Quote from: Halcionmc has lost a bit of his sense of humor towards "spam" flashes. maybe its just the general NG public harassing mods and admins about them.
i dunno i think he flat out disagrees with most of our viewpoints. he definitely hated it when wonchop got hacked and when we criticized alvin earthworm
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 14, 2008 05:37 AM
Really? MC criticizes Alvin in AIM from time to time...


(bite me psi, its relevant.)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Sonni on April 14, 2008 05:41 AM
Quote from: MRatReally? MC criticizes Alvin in AIM from time to time...


(bite me psi, its relevant.)

I think I vaguely remember reading some blog and seeing MC defending Alvin. Say something like "he may use sprite but he got good timing and stuffs" something like that along the line. I can't remember exactly though.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 14, 2008 05:48 AM
I wouldn't be surprised if a while ago he did that. But I think he's finally just gotten fed up with that shit like the rest of us have.


Sprites are going to be bad. No matter what.



Also, I'd find stupid reviews, but I'm too lazy right now maybe later.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 14, 2008 06:56 AM
Quote from: SonniI think I vaguely remember reading some blog and seeing MC defending Alvin. Say something like "he may use sprite but he got good timing and stuffs" something like that along the line. I can't remember exactly though.
yeah i dont remember it too well either but i know i saw it
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 14, 2008 07:04 AM
Oh well, he's a hypocrite too, just like every human being on the planet.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Greenkitten on April 14, 2008 09:46 AM
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg378.imageshack.us%2Fimg378%2F5910%2Fgggia1.png&hash=3b4d328c974221ebf95b201b62f1af7d1f9b3fd9)

I know this is an alt account but I found this funny.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 14, 2008 10:35 AM
mindchamber has more power on ng now
so its now a 'snafu' to be seen cavorting with the likes of us heathens
that or he just hates anigen

either way who gives a dink
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Halcion on April 14, 2008 10:39 AM
the heretics of the NG videogame parody religion (its at least got enough "hardcore" fans to be a cult)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 14, 2008 10:49 AM
Im a nihilistic; anarchistic, atheistic, hater, a spamming fiend, a trolling king, and bad movie creator, I flame and fuss and moan and piss and bitch my way to the top! I leave hundreds of hateful comments on userpages and no i'll never stop! I mass-PM and DoS and generally I'm a dick! But if there's one thing that I'll never do it's be somebodys bitch! No I'll never bend over and suck admin cock just to be protected by higher-ups, wades a fag and i proudly proclaim im glad from him im blocked, and when I see the seeds of greed and hatred start to sow, in a young man who loves to spam a good deed ive done I know.

Yo ho ho the Homosexual Pirate song yarrrr me matey
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 14, 2008 11:05 AM
Quote from: SqueefIm a nihilistic; anarchistic, atheistic, hater, a spamming fiend, a trolling king, and bad movie creator, I flame and fuss and moan and piss and bitch my way to the top! I leave hundreds of hateful comments on userpages and no i'll never stop! I mass-PM and DoS and generally I'm a dick! But if there's one thing that I'll never do it's be somebodys bitch! No I'll never bend over and suck admin cock just to be protected by higher-ups, wades a fag and i proudly proclaim im glad from him im blocked, and when I see the seeds of greed and hatred start to sow, in a young man who loves to spam a good deed ive done I know.
Kberkag
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Halcion on April 14, 2008 11:11 AM
i am "anon" bullshit?

i just noticed, is that pocoyo?
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 14, 2008 11:12 AM
Quote from: Halcioni just noticed, is that pocoyo?


yes it is

my aim icon was sleepy bird for a while
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Loathsome on April 14, 2008 11:35 AM
You haven't written any long reviews after that huh, psi?

Quote from: FreekCthe old thread

http://www.thebackalleys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=2414 (http://www.thebackalleys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=2414)


Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 14, 2008 05:11 PM
10 fun bucks says this kids also a madness fan
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: psi43 on April 14, 2008 06:57 PM
Quote from: LoathsomeYou haven't written any long reviews after that huh, psi?

Quote from: FreekCthe old thread

http://www.thebackalleys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=2414 (http://www.thebackalleys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=2414)





I was review banned before that, otherwise I would've posted the reply with my main account.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 07:12 PM
Quote from: anigeni really hope this one is a joke because if it isnt ive lost all respect for mindchamber

for a flash that i made in like ten minutes while talking to tomamoto: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/434469 (http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/434469)

ya I didn't realize, you had done this under an alt account.  its actually quite decent coming from you.
And, yeah I meant what I said,   when I met you at the con I had figured you were serious about learning flash and doing something with it, but all I ever see from you since then, are posts of you harassing other submitters like you have any real place to do so.

now that I know you actually did that loop I take it back , good for you.


Quote from: Halcionmc has lost a bit of his sense of humor towards "spam" flashes. maybe its just the general NG public harassing mods and admins about them.

I love spam flashes as much as the next guy, but if they aren't even funny whats the fucking point?
To say that I , or any one else are against spam flashes is pure bullshit, because tom Frontpages some of the stupidest, nastiest shit.  

Quote from: Zekeymindchamber has more power on ng now
so its now a 'snafu' to be seen cavorting with the likes of us heathens
that or he just hates anigen
I have no power. its the fuckin internet.  That said I knock heads with dudes in the office all the time.
If you shit out something and its funny, Im the first one to say to tom, "Yo FRONTPAGE dat Shit"
it has nothing to do with who makes it.
and yeah I got tired of anigens shit, plain and simple.  He wanted me to do a collab with you and rtil, and I said yes, not knowing that he was bullshitting about the whole thing and neither one of them agreed. I don't know about you but I fuckin hate lairs. on top of that he would IM me just to tell me he took a shit. that was wearing me down to.  I AM glad to see a place where he can grow though. so at least in that respect he's learning flash , using it, and having fun, so thats all good.



Quote from: anigenthis would probably explain it

i dont know, i guess hes under the perception that once you've made some silly spam shit you're instantly doomed to stagnation and becoming shitty
what he doesnt get is that people like zsl and rtil made spam and they're fine animators. maybe i'll prove him wrong when i make something

and I've given them nothing but high scores and reviews, because most of the time, the spam they produce is entertaining.
Quote from: f0dmindchamber's a fuckin dipshit when it comes to spam
i mean he used to be friends with guys like sinista and zero but stopped talking to them once goldencat released that abusing NG book. its like he blamed us all for something one member did.
it sucks too because i bet mindchamber would be cool with us if he wasn't made biased by stamper and johnnyutah's viewpoints. i remember a few years back mindchamber nearly made a dailytoon. and tom says he would probably be interested in helping us with an experimental series if we started one

And now to the main reason I joined here.
youre a fuckin dipshit for thinking you know how I think.  no one influences the way I think,  I think the fact I have knocked heads with the team on alot shit already proves that.
and you know Shit about Sinista and I,  I love that kid like hes my brother, and we stopped talking when he headed to the services, and I got busy plain and simple. My only gripe with him and he knows this is that he spent to much time bitchin about the system than making shit.  He's really talented but got quickly discouraged when other users picked up on certain flash techniques quicker than he did,  Thats when he forced me to block him from mindchamber.net and joined SS.  Im also the main reason he got a tablet. So do me the favor and dont talk shit about something you know dick about.



anyways I still think alot of you guys waste waaaaay too much time bitching about stupid shit instead of just creating. You can get your point out alot more if you were just a tiny bit more constructive with your time, than trying to shit on the one site that gives you a voice.

like that whole "Counter-MetalGear collab" bullshit.. I mean,. why?  if its funny why not just send it to us?
why shit on our little contests .. we want to have fun just like you guys...
theres so many flash corporate sites that would just shit on you guys,

NG is run by a handful of dudes that just want a good chuckle like the rest of you, why fucking shit all over that?

all I want, all we all ever want is something entertaining or funny.  has nothing to do with the quality.  Which brings me to my other issue

Don't you all think its a tad hypocritical to say shit like Sprite, or tween movies take no effort.. But we are a bunch of snobs for not voting 5 on every shit spam you guys pour out?

I like the SSBZ flashes because they are entertaining,  its a throw back to every cheezy 80s cartoon ever created.
Same over the top fights, same retarded storytelling.

on the same token I vote high and what makes me laugh. and whats good, alot of the SS daily s get alot of high scores from me because they are funny.. but just because they are highly received doesn't give any of you the right to dictate whats good content or not..

anyways thats all im really gonna say,

just know you are fighting with the wrong people, because all of us at NG have been on your side from get go..




Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 14, 2008 07:18 PM
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

the guest gather arms!

hold men...

PRINT TOPIC!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 07:20 PM
Quote from: FreekCAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

the guest gather arms!

hold men...

PRINT TOPIC!

ehhh typical.

aint nobody gatherin nothin.

just me, trying to clear some misconceptions.

but whatever. print it, roll it, stick up your ass for all I care,
as long as you GET it.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 14, 2008 07:21 PM
no i was sayng oh never mind im probably the worst person to consult on this matter
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: psi43 on April 14, 2008 07:45 PM
Quote from: MindChamber
Quote from: Halcionmc has lost a bit of his sense of humor towards "spam" flashes. maybe its just the general NG public harassing mods and admins about them.

I love spam flashes as much as the next guy, but if they aren\\\'t even funny whats the fucking point?


You are right, you are so completely right. And seeing as you are tight with the admins, try and get AfroStud and his shitty Adolf Hitler flashes deleted or at least a warning and a portal ban.

http://joelasticool.newgrounds.com (http://joelasticool.newgrounds.com) <-prime example for great spam
http://afrounderscorestud.newgrounds.com (http://afrounderscorestud.newgrounds.com) <-prime example for shitty spam
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 14, 2008 08:02 PM
Quote from: MindChamber
Quote from: FreekCAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

the guest gather arms!

hold men...

PRINT TOPIC!

ehhh typical.

aint nobody gatherin nothin.

just me, trying to clear some misconceptions.

but whatever. print it, roll it, stick up your ass for all I care,
as long as you GET it.
he was actually making a joke about this weird phenomenon where the member list will sometimes say guests are printing topics. but ok!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quote from: MindChamberanyways I still think alot of you guys waste waaaaay too much time bitching about stupid shit instead of just creating. You can get your point out alot more if you were just a tiny bit more constructive with your time, than trying to shit on the one site that gives you a voice.

like that whole "Counter-MetalGear collab" bullshit.. I mean,. why?  if its funny why not just send it to us?
why shit on our little contests .. we want to have fun just like you guys...
theres so many flash corporate sites that would just shit on you guys,
so all we do is sit on forums and bitch all day, riiiiiiiiiiiiight? sounds like someone i know..

anyway it\\\'s pretty clear that your version of fun and our version of fun is a little different. if you think that we should just submit our metal gear cartoons to you guys, well, you\\\'ve clearly missed the entire point of our collab.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 08:02 PM
Quote from: rtilhe was actually making a joke about this weird phenomenon where the member list will sometimes say guests are printing topics. but ok!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

well he didn't really say that sista but.. OK!!!!


and nicole I sent that to wade and he said he will look into it.

cant really do much more than that.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 14, 2008 08:05 PM
i'd be surprised if he did anything about it, considering it's been going on for over 2 years
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 08:07 PM
Quote from: rtilso all we do is sit on forums and bitch all day, riiiiiiiiiiiiight? sounds like someone i know..


Ahh, you gonna be a bitch like that?  Did I actually say that?

actually the only time I complain is when somes A) Stealing art.
stealing flash.

either case I just dont bitch I actually get shit done about it,

Quote
anyway it's pretty clear that your version of fun and our version of fun is a little different. if you think that we should just submit our metal gear cartoons to you guys, well, you've clearly missed the entire point of our collab.

ahh so you weren't gonna make a collab thats funny, and entertaining?   if not then what was the point.?
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: psi43 on April 14, 2008 08:08 PM
Quote from: MindChamberanyways I still think alot of you guys waste waaaaay too much time bitching about stupid shit instead of just creating. You can get your point out alot more if you were just a tiny bit more constructive with your time, than trying to shit on the one site that gives you a voice.


Ugh, you tell food not to talk about something he has no fucking clue about so why do you do it? We have tied to create a shitload of stuff already, remember dailytoon400 and the incredibly low score it got? Remember every fucking dailytoon of season 4 which passed with 250 views and an average score of 2.1? We were complaining because shit like that happens, nobody's doing anything about it and when we try to people tell us to "be creative"? Come on.

Quote from: MindChamberlike that whole "Counter-MetalGear collab" bullshit.. I mean,. why?  if its funny why not just send it to us?
why shit on our little contests .. we want to have fun just like you guys...
theres so many flash corporate sites that would just shit on you guys,

You kind of answered your same question there. We want to have fun but we don't want to be in a collab full of metal gear awesome jokes and such.

Quote from: MindChamberDon't you all think its a tad hypocritical to say shit like Sprite, or tween movies take no effort.. But we are a bunch of snobs for not voting 5 on every shit spam you guys pour out?

I like the SSBZ flashes because they are entertaining,  its a throw back to every cheezy 80s cartoon ever created.
Same over the top fights, same retarded storytelling.

Who said we wanted to get fives on our spam movies. All we want is people to actually watch them (with spam movies I don't mean Anigen's unfunny shit). I don't see how this is hypocritical either, you already said that flash isn't about quality, it's more about entertainment, haven't you?

Oh and if by cartoon you mean anime and by every cheezy 80s 'cartoon' you mean dragonball then yes, I think you are right. And I think that's what the Z in the title stands for.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 14, 2008 08:08 PM
most people here do not find metal gear awesome rehash cartoons funny and entertaining. we are mocking video game parody, and you guys are making a video game parody. it's two totally different things. i'm surprised you can't tell the difference
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 08:09 PM
Quote from: rtili'd be surprised if he did anything about it, considering it's been going on for over 2 years


thats why theres a voting system.

obviously your idea of funny isn't some of the audiences idea of funny.

weird how that works.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 14, 2008 08:10 PM
Quote from: MindChamberAhh, you gonna be a bitch like that?  Did I actually say that?

actually the only time I complain is when somes A) Stealing art.
stealing flash.

either case I just dont bitch I actually get shit done about it,
most of us have made plenty of cartoons expressing our views on the issues we often talk about. and yes, you said something like we sit around and bitch all day and don't do anything about it. that's completely untrue
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: psi43 on April 14, 2008 08:10 PM
Quote from: MindChamberand nicole I sent that to wade and he said he will look into it.

cant really do much more than that.


ps. thanks a lot buddy!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 14, 2008 08:10 PM
Quote from: MindChamber
Quote from: rtili'd be surprised if he did anything about it, considering it's been going on for over 2 years


thats why theres a voting system.

obviously your idea of funny isn't some of the audiences idea of funny.

weird how that works.
i didn't know anyone thought resubmitting the same cartoon 500 times was funny.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 08:13 PM
Quote from: rtilmost people here do not find metal gear awesome rehash cartoons funny and entertaining. we are mocking video game parody, and you guys are making a video game parody. it\\\'s two totally different things. i\\\'m surprised you can\\\'t tell the difference

I like what makes me laugh.. either. its a video game parody, or a parody on video game parodies. which BTW the minute you draw snake in any fashion makes a video game parody regardless of the premise.

and I can tell the difference.  but then again this is an   entertainment site.  something I guess you haven\\\'t figured out yet.

Quote from: rtil
Quote from: MindChamber
Quote from: rtili\\\'d be surprised if he did anything about it, considering it\\\'s been going on for over 2 years


thats why theres a voting system.

obviously your idea of funny isn\\\'t some of the audiences idea of funny.

weird how that works.
i didn\\\'t know anyone thought resubmitting the same cartoon 500 times was funny.


ya\\\'ll  found duckspin pretty HILARIOUS if I recall.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 14, 2008 08:13 PM
Quote from: MindChamberahh so you weren't gonna make a collab thats funny, and entertaining?   if not then what was the point.?

the funs gonna be in makin it and seeing peoples dumfounded reactions.

i think if its gets frontpaged or wins an award or something then we completely missed the fucking point
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 14, 2008 08:15 PM
yes, i am so blind, conceited and arrogant. save me from myself mindchamber. it\\\'s funny how people like you don\\\'t even bother to get to know me and instead get all their opinions of me from two-faced people like the swain. thanks a lot for that

Quote from: MindChamberya\\\'ll  found duckspin pretty HILARIOUS if I recall.
you got the wrong website buddy
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 14, 2008 08:16 PM
whats a duckspin
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 14, 2008 08:17 PM
some stupid clockcrew joke. he's probably lumping us in with all the other flash "groups"
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: psi43 on April 14, 2008 08:20 PM
oh god you mean duck.fla? That shit was horrible. They even sold T-shirts for that and I blocked everyone from my MSN who got one, that were like 3 people.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 14, 2008 08:20 PM
ew clocks
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 08:23 PM
Quote from: rtilyes, i am so blind, conceited and arrogant. save me from myself mindchamber. it's funny how people like you don't even bother to get to know me and instead get all their opinions of me from two-faced people like the swain. thanks a lot for that


ahah dude..


Swain has never.. EVER said anything about you to me.  you need to quit being so paranoid.  I came on here on my own accord,
that orphan law has got me scared shitless and I googled my name on my break wondering who else might be using it and found this. NO one. least of all is Swain is talking shit about you.

Lets be really fair here, the only shit talking I see that involve Swain is on these forums...

As for the concieted, arrogant stuff, Ive never heard anything like what you just said from anyone else but yourself.  if you have issues, work them out.

I have and always will be a fan of your work.  I don't need to get to know you to love what you do.


Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: anigen on April 14, 2008 08:26 PM
Quote from: MindChamber
Quote from: anigeni really hope this one is a joke because if it isnt ive lost all respect for mindchamber

for a flash that i made in like ten minutes while talking to tomamoto: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/434469 (http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/434469)

ya I didn't realize, you had done this under an alt account.  its actually quite decent coming from you.
And, yeah I meant what I said,   when I met you at the con I had figured you were serious about learning flash and doing something with it, but all I ever see from you since then, are posts of you harassing other submitters like you have any real place to do so.

Negina is the only alt I use, just for submitting spam, just to clarify that

I am serious about learning flash and doing something with it. That loop was just something that I made when I was talking to tomamoto on skype about how catchy that song was. I don't even see why it bothers you, it was just simple dicking around that didnt hurt anyone

About harassing users, I have to say it's been a fairly long time since I've harassed anyone... the only one i actually harassed was wonchop, who im completely sick of and dont even talk about anymore.

you and luis have made it clear to me that you completely have lost any and all hope that i'll ever submit anything, and that's fine with me, because when the time comes that i actually do something with effort, what are you going to say
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 14, 2008 08:31 PM
Quote from: MindChamberAs for the concieted, arrogant stuff, Ive never heard anything like what you just said from anyone else but yourself.  if you have issues, work them out.
you're the one who accused me of being high and mighty for suggesting something not involving dicks in the writer's strike topic
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 08:35 PM
Quote from: ΨNicoleUgh, you tell food not to talk about something he has no fucking clue about so why do you do it? We have tied to create a shitload of stuff already, remember dailytoon400 and the incredibly low score it got? Remember every fucking dailytoon of season 4 which passed with 250 views and an average score of 2.1? We were complaining because shit like that happens, nobody's doing anything about it and when we try to people tell us to "be creative"? Come on.
read again,  Im refering to the relationship I have with sinister.
as for the low score, what are we supposed to do about it? maybe adding a bit more quality would help

Quote
You kind of answered your same question there. We want to have fun but we don't want to be in a collab full of metal gear awesome jokes and such.
if you have snake jerking off... guess what you are in a colab full of metal gear solid jokes. if you draw snake or any of the characters even once... you are in a collab full of metal gear solid jokes.

just for record we have a submission of Snake jacking off, and it has nothing to do with the game.. and its hilarious.

Quote

Who said we wanted to get fives on our spam movies. All we want is people to actually watch them (with spam movies I don't mean Anigen's unfunny shit). I don't see how this is hypocritical either, you already said that flash isn't about quality, it's more about entertainment, haven't you?

wait.... what.... you just stated a few seconds ago, that you were upset the dailys got 2.1 now you are saying all you want is for people to watch them, and you dont care about score... which is it.

QuoteOh and if by cartoon you mean anime and by every cheezy 80s 'cartoon' you mean dragonball then yes, I think you are right. And I think that's what the Z in the title stands for.
yes I do.  they are fun to watch..  just because I prefer to animate in frame by frame, doesn't mean I cant appreciate a fun sprite movie,  who am I to say they are doing it wrong? if I don't like it I vote low, but I have no right to say their form of creativity is any less deserving because of it.. especially if its obviously it took work.


Quote from: rtil
Quote from: MindChamberAs for the concieted, arrogant stuff, Ive never heard anything like what you just said from anyone else but yourself.  if you have issues, work them out.
you're the one who accused me of being high and mighty for suggesting something not involving dicks in the writer's strike topic

haha boy do you love to paraphrase, my whole point to that argument was that making a serious flash about the writers strike wouldnt have made it any more important or impressionable that if it was funny.

not to mention that strike only benefited the unions,.  

you know , DA MAN.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 14, 2008 08:37 PM
just fyi

we already know that in order to make fun of metal gear parodies we have to get our hands dirty

but i don\\\'t think you realize the main reason we\\\'re doing it is because of the reactions we\\\'re going to get. a lot of people aren\\\'t going to be able to look past the fact that we\\\'re having fun and instead argue that we are only trying to insult them. then they will write hilarious reviews and get all red in the face, all because we made fun of their precious video game.

Quote from: MindChamberSwain has never.. EVER said anything about you to me.
well that just shows you how two-faced he really is. you should see some of the things he wrote to me in private.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 08:41 PM
Quote from: anigenNegina is the only alt I use, just for submitting spam, just to clarify that

I am serious about learning flash and doing something with it. That loop was just something that I made when I was talking to tomamoto on skype about how catchy that song was. I don't even see why it bothers you, it was just simple dicking around that didnt hurt anyone

About harassing users, I have to say it's been a fairly long time since I've harassed anyone... the only one i actually harassed was wonchop, who im completely sick of and dont even talk about anymore.

you and luis have made it clear to me that you completely have lost any and all hope that i'll ever submit anything, and that's fine with me,

cant you read?  I actually liked the loop.. I thought it was submitted by someone else.. someone else who was getting annoyed with your shit.. hence the buzzing maya song.. once I realized you made it I posted here and said good work.  how did you miss that?

as for luis and I giving up on you. no one said that.

Quotebecause when the time comes that i actually do something with effort, what are you going to say

we are going to say, bravo, awesome work, nice to see you got down and dirty and put some effort..
if anything we will be happier than shit to see you succeed,  none of us are out to get you, or stop you from succeeding.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: mishkamash on April 14, 2008 08:48 PM
WARNING
drama level is extreme
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 14, 2008 08:49 PM
Members: Joelasticot, rtil, MishkaMash, FreekC, MRat, ΨNicole

joelast? who made increase its size?
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 08:50 PM
Quote from: rtiljust fyi

we already know that in order to make fun of metal gear parodies we have to get our hands dirty

but i don't think you realize the main reason we're doing it is because of the reactions we're going to get. a lot of people aren't going to be able to look past the fact that we're having fun and instead argue that we are only trying to insult them. then they will write hilarious reviews and get all red in the face, all because we made fun of their precious video game.

then I guess you dont get it either.  Look at the transformers collab.  I had Frenzy ejaculating all over some chick.
Stampers version pissed off all of my hardcore TF friends, and I didn't care it was hilarious.  we do it for the same reasons.  for reactions.  but..... if it aint funny first and foremost,,, then that red look on their face will not be because  you made fun of their precious video game, it will be because you ain't funny.


Quotewell that just shows you how two-faced he really is. you should see some of the things he wrote to me in private.
actually hes a bigger man than me. I confront people directly.
in your face, online, whatever.  Ive told Tom if NG ever went corporate I'd leave. No matter what you think, Im a wayy bigger asshole than you will ever pretend to be,. BUT,, I back up my asshole-ness by being super righteous.

even turned down an animation job because they were hiring me only because I was Spanish. FUCK That.

Theres nothing two faced about Swain telling you off privately. if anything he was being courteous.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: YungJazz on April 14, 2008 08:56 PM
Yo Mindchamber...Alot of people on this forum don't care what you say at all, they're just going to keep arguing whether you prove a valid point or not, because they're bored in real life and this is about the limit of the excitement they'll get. Knowing that (wish I had earlier), I wouldn't take what they say seriously. It's best to just ignore them.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 14, 2008 08:57 PM
breakin down walls
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 14, 2008 08:59 PM
Quote from: MindChamberthen I guess you dont get it either.  Look at the transformers collab.  I had Frenzy ejaculating all over some chick.
Stampers version pissed off all of my hardcore TF friends, and I didn't care it was hilarious.  we do it for the same reasons.  for reactions.  but..... if it aint funny first and foremost,,, that red look on their face is not because  you made fun of their precious video game, it will because you ain't funny.
you know you're giving way too much credit to your average viewer. and just not newgrounds viewer, any online viewer period. whoever frenzy is "ejaculating all over some chick" is not my idea of a mock parody, it's my idea of something crude only for the sake of being crude. to me , it's not funny. other people might find it funny, fine. if you think i'm not funny, that's an opinion, not a fact. and after being around the SS for 2 years, there are indeed people who become very insulted over things like making fun of a video game. if you have yet to run into someone like that, i would be astounded.

you can keep imagining the official collab and ours are totally one and the same, but you'll be proven wrong the day they get released. the reactions will be entirely different.


Quoteactually hes a bigger man than me. I confront people directly.
in your face, online, whatever.  Ive told Tom if NG ever went corporate I'd leave. No matter what you think, Im a wayy bigger asshole that you will ever pretend to be,. BUT,, I back up my asshole-ness by being super righteous.

even turned down an animation job because they were hiring me only because I was Spanish. FUCK That.

Theres nothing two faced about Swain telling you off privately. if anything he was being courteous.
wait so i'm a fake now? lmao anyway, i forgot to mention that swain is a big people-pleaser and a brown-noser. so he does his dirty work and mouths off to people behind closed doors so his image doesn't get tarnished. yeah, that's a real honorable thing to do. at least i'm honest and straightforward when it comes to the things in the community that i think are messed up.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 08:59 PM
Quote from: YungJazzYo Mindchamber...Alot of people on this forum don't care what you say at all, they're just going to keep arguing whether you prove a valid point or not, because they're bored in real life and this is about the limit of the excitement they'll get. Knowing that (wish I had earlier), I wouldn't take what they say seriously. It's best to just ignore them.

I cant do that.  theres real talent here.

these people are what NG was created for.

and for some reason they are misconstruing what NG is all about.  

as long they know... officially NG aint out to get them or vote their shit down.. they can't have excuses
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 14, 2008 09:01 PM
hey i love NG

i know you werent referring to me on the talent thing but newgrounds is great, its just the community which is terrible

i must admit i contribute to that
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 14, 2008 09:02 PM
Quote from: YungJazzYo Mindchamber...Alot of people on this forum don't care what you say at all, they're just going to keep arguing whether you prove a valid point or not, because they're bored in real life and this is about the limit of the excitement they'll get. Knowing that (wish I had earlier), I wouldn't take what they say seriously. It's best to just ignore them.


Yeah we're know your not the swiftest Kalen, you don't need to remind us.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: psi43 on April 14, 2008 09:03 PM
Quote from: MindChamberas for the low score, what are we supposed to do about it? maybe adding a bit more quality would help


HELLO, WE ARE TELLING YOU GUYS WHAT COULD BE DONE ALL THE FUCKING TIME, MAYBE START LISTENING? You said that we should stop complain and THEN you ask what could be done about it?

Quote from: MindChamberwait.... what.... you just stated a few seconds ago, that you were upset the dailys got 2.1 now you are saying all you want is for people to watch them, and you dont care about score... which is it.

I don't think there's anything bad in adding the score the flashes get to bring across my point even more. I was more referring to the views.

Quote from: MindChamberyes I do. they are fun to watch.. just because I prefer to animate in frame by frame, doesn't mean I cant appreciate a fun sprite movie, who am I to say they are doing it wrong? if I don't like it I vote low, but I have no right to say their form of creativity is any less deserving because of it.. especially if its obviously it took work.

maybe you should let me have my own opinion? I dislike sprite movies because they're bound to contain video game characters. I dislike the use of video game characters because they're bound to tell stupid and unfunny jokes or fart or whatever. It's just not entertaining for me and I don't know why you made me explain myself on that.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 14, 2008 09:05 PM
NATHAN MALONE GET THE FUCK IN HERE THIS INSTANT WE NEED AN


[size=]
IMAGE MACRO!
[/size]
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 14, 2008 09:08 PM
I WANT TO GO TOO FRIENDLYYYYYYYY'S
YEH YEH!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: mishkamash on April 14, 2008 09:09 PM
and so wps saves the day
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: anigen on April 14, 2008 09:09 PM
Quoteas for luis and I giving up on you. no one said that.
luis did.

QuoteHe wanted me to do a collab with you and rtil, and I said yes, not knowing that he was bullshitting about the whole thing and neither one of them agreed.

wrong. i wasn't bullshitting you at all. zekey was in on it, and from where i was standing, rtil was going to make something too, but rtil got busy with freetown and school and i think zekey lost interest in the idea, and I couldn't just do the collab with you

i will admit though that i was very hyper about the project and probably drew too much attention to it. it's a good thing that the collab did fall apart though because i was probably the worst animator in it at the time and would have probably made something horrifically bad and embarrassing. i mean look at the death of wonchop. i look back on that now and think the whole thing was of very poor quality and get why everyone hated it so much when i submitted it

Quoteon top of that he would IM me just to tell me he took a shit.
i don't remember this at all, (conveniently enough) but if I ever did do that, i am sorry. but people change. psi and rtil changed the way i acted in a big way, pointing out how unfunny and annoying i was back then. keep in mind this was like 8 months ago

QuoteYo Mindchamber...Alot of people on this forum don't care what you say at all, they're just going to keep arguing whether you prove a valid point or not, because they're bored in real life and this is about the limit of the excitement they'll get. Knowing that (wish I had earlier), I wouldn't take what they say seriously. It's best to just ignore them.

ugh ok what are you doing, sucking up now?
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 14, 2008 09:11 PM
and the backalleys was safe once again

post some more silly reviews!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 14, 2008 09:11 PM
Quote from: MindChamberthe minute you draw snake in any fashion makes a video game parody regardless of the premise.



This is horrifyingly incorrect.  In so... many... ways.



a humorous or satirical imitation of a serious piece of literature or writing: his hilarious parody of Hamlet's soliloquy.



Uhm, if we're not making it about video games, then even if we use video game characters, it's not parody. This is fact and not up for debate.



We are parodying the parodies. The concept is entirely different. Nothing you will ever say will change this simple fact.




Look, I like you, both as an artist and as a person, but you're just jumping to conclusions here and your not giving any serious thought to this stuff, [size=]THIS IS THE INTERNET AND IT REQUIRES YOU'RE FULL ATTENTION IT'S VERY IMPORTANT![/size]
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 14, 2008 09:12 PM
[size=]THE CLASH OF THE TEXTWALLS[/size]
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 14, 2008 09:14 PM
Quote from: wps[size=]THE CLASH OF THE TEXTWALLS[/size]


Starring Michael Richards and Wayne Knight as two.... men....




DIRECTED BY JOEL AND ETHAN COEN
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 09:15 PM
Quote
you know you're giving way too much credit to your average viewer. and just not newgrounds viewer, any online viewer period. whoever frenzy is "ejaculating all over some chick" is not my idea of a mock parody, it's my idea of something crude only for the sake of being crude. to me , it's not funny. other people might find it funny, fine. if you think i'm not funny, that's an opinion, not a fact. and after being around the SS for 2 years, there are indeed people who become very insulted over things like making fun of a video game. if you have yet to run into someone like that, i would be astounded.
Haha and nothing the SS is crude for the sake of being crude?  oh come on.  even you cant swallow that.
anyways what could possibly be different?  you gonna show some drooling kid asking for Metalgear then crying? either way making a parody on the game, or the gamers that play it or the viewers that watch parodies of games playing it is no different.. at all..

Quote
you can keep imagining the official collab and ours are totally one and the same, but you'll be proven wrong the day they get released. the reactions will be entirely different.
how can you be so certain? you just said 2 seconds ago that opinions aren't facts, how can you be so certain that the reactions wouldn't be the same? what will you did if yours is  actually funnier and gets a higher score?
would the defeat the purpose?

the only thing I can see that would get a different reaction, is adding screamers, popups, malicious code.
in which case, nah that aint funny. thats just a feeble attempt at trying to break the system.



Quotewait so i'm a fake now? lmao anyway, i forgot to mention that swain is a big people-pleaser and a brown-noser. so he does his dirty work and mouths off to people behind closed doors so his image doesn't get tarnished. yeah, that's a real honorable thing to do. at least i'm honest and straightforward when it comes to the things in the community that i think are messed up.
duude haha,  you're full of shit... you shook his hand... if you were that hardcore you wouldn't have.

I refused to shake synjs hand, and basically called Gel out for being a bitch on NG...
He isn't a brownser.. he does his kind of flashes his way.. and that ha never changed. he isnt doing flash or game parodies or parodies based on flash collabs either.  hes doing his own thing. just as you are.

and no one has any problems with you complaining about the NG community. it needs work. it will always need work. because its an open system.  a system that can be abused or even destroyed, but if it wasnt there, then all you have would be sites like.  flashplayer and other sites that monitor everything and limit your access.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: psi43 on April 14, 2008 09:16 PM
um yes you guys are really funny, this isn't the NG BBS.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: mishkamash on April 14, 2008 09:16 PM
i agree with mrat and mindchamber with the following quotes



Quote from: MRat[size=]THIS IS THE INTERNET[/size]
Quote from: MindChamberI have no power.[size=] its the fuckin internet.[/size]

yep
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 09:17 PM
Quote from: FreekCnewgrounds is great, its just the community which is terrible

i must admit i contribute to that

and there in the solution lies the problem.



lol
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 14, 2008 09:18 PM
thanks alot guys you completely ruined my topic
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: mishkamash on April 14, 2008 09:19 PM
Quote from: FreekCthanks alot guys you completely ruined my topic
:-(
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 14, 2008 09:20 PM
Quote from: MindChamber
Quote from: FreekCnewgrounds is great, its just the community which is terrible

i must admit i contribute to that

and there in the solution lies the problem.



lol

dunno you just banned me for 30 days and took away my powers to review that seems to be the mods solution for everything
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 14, 2008 09:23 PM
if we were all a little more like alvin earthworm perhaps we'd be part of the solution and not the problem
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 09:26 PM
Quote from: ΨNicoleHELLO, WE ARE TELLING YOU GUYS WHAT COULD BE DONE ALL THE FUCKING TIME, MAYBE START LISTENING? You said that we should stop complain and THEN you ask what could be done about it?
lol, that was hypothetical, theres nothing that can be done about it. its an open system,

Quote
I don't think there's anything bad in adding the score the flashes get to bring across my point even more. I was more referring to the views.
so its our job to bring more views to your flashes. flashes you originally admit aren't of high quality and are designed to simply stir the shit.  why are we obligated to push your work ?


Quote
maybe you should let me have my own opinion? I dislike sprite movies because they're bound to contain video game characters. I dislike the use of video game characters because they're bound to tell stupid and unfunny jokes or fart or whatever. It's just not entertaining for me and I don't know why you made me explain myself on that.
No one said you shouldn't have an opinion, the problem is you want your opinion to be worth more than others.
telling me what needs to be deleted BASED on your opinion is not worthy of the portal breaks the open system.  

granted that link you sent has merit. it was a waste of space because there was zero effort, but then again so was duckspin.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 14, 2008 09:26 PM
Quote from: rtilif we were all a little more like alvin earthworm perhaps we'd be part of the solution and not the problem

youre a visionary rtil, a true visionary
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 14, 2008 09:26 PM
Quote from: rtilso all we do is sit on forums and bitch all day, riiiiiiiiiiiiight? sounds like someone i know..


(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thelensflare.com%2Flarge%2Fbird_2171.jpg&hash=b557da57d12785e15c1a718f0bab5766442a6e39)


Quote from: MRatNATHAN MALONE GET THE FUCK IN HERE THIS INSTANT WE NEED AN



IMAGE MACRO!

POW
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fphilip9876.files.wordpress.com%2F2007%2F10%2Fnuclear-explosion.jpg&hash=a632cd4904b6f38b077ee0c9c2d03a36cfbe1a1b)
BIFF
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fphoto.net%2Fphoto%2Fpcd0087%2Fcheese-doodles-wide-60.4.jpg&hash=8d20336217c88a8e62e11da2a8c9ed35b425152d)
WHACK
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msstate.edu%2Fdept%2Fpoultry%2Fpics%2Fanatomy.jpg&hash=beeb219e9b7ebad34986eabbabe5cf442bf5ea59)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Hammi on April 14, 2008 09:27 PM
Quote from: anigen
QuoteYo Mindchamber...Alot of people on this forum don't care what you say at all, they're just going to keep arguing whether you prove a valid point or not, because they're bored in real life and this is about the limit of the excitement they'll get. Knowing that (wish I had earlier), I wouldn't take what they say seriously. It's best to just ignore them.

ugh ok what are you doing, sucking up now?

Lmfao. Seems like it. And it looks lame too.

And oh, i hate the drama level in here... too hot for me. Its painful to watch MC and Rtil & friends crash into each others like flesh sick eagles. Wheres the harmony people? When will all the fighting end? I know i know... setting the past straight... Alright, empty out your explosives, then lets grab a pizza after that. Btw welcome MC.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 14, 2008 09:28 PM
thank u nathan!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 09:28 PM
Quote from: rtilif we were all a little more like alvin earthworm perhaps we'd be part of the solution and not the problem


no ones saying that..   you need to do what works for you. and if the public likes it fine. and if they don't fuck them.

but as long you are doing what you want with your art, your stories and your characters it really doesn't matter what someone else is doing.

and if someone jumps on some fad wagon so what?  the time and effort it took to make your creation will always stand the test of time..
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: mishkamash on April 14, 2008 09:29 PM
Quote from: rtilif we were all a little more like alvin earthworm perhaps we'd be part of the solution and not the problem
and i'll just point out that would be just plain horrible
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 09:32 PM
Quote from: HammiAnd oh, i hate the drama level in here... too hot for me. Its painful to watch MC and Rtil & friends crash into each others like flesh sick eagles. Wheres the harmony people? When will all the fighting end? I know i know... setting the past straight... Alright, empty out your explosives, then lets grab a pizza after that. Btw welcome MC.

no drama..

anigen created a loop I thought he didn't, I was wrong ,and I set the record straight with that.
f0d was gossiping about a friendship I have had with sinister for almost 5 years now, and I set the record  straight on that as well.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Hammi on April 14, 2008 09:35 PM
Good, thats what i like to hear. Usually people argue and bicker over stupid shit nonstop. Alright, lets continue then.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: mishkamash on April 14, 2008 09:35 PM
10 Members: MishkaMash, Zekey, michelle, anigen, Hammi, wps, ΨNicole, MindChamber, rtil, Miro
it's gettin hot in here

 










i guess i'm not helping
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 14, 2008 09:35 PM
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fayearinthedark.files.wordpress.com%2F2007%2F09%2Fcitizen-kane-opens.jpg&hash=fc02368298d8a4f107632e909d890f3a572863e8)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Halcion on April 14, 2008 09:36 PM
gizzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzard
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: mishkamash on April 14, 2008 09:36 PM
oh u silly zekey  
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 14, 2008 09:37 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwrjOLSPVCw
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 09:37 PM
love that avatar Zek... the statue scene used to creep me out when I was younger.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Hammi on April 14, 2008 09:38 PM
I might make a comic strip out of this one too, after when im done reading through the whole thread.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 14, 2008 09:40 PM
Quote from: MindChamberlove that avatar Zek... the statue scene used to creep me out when I was younger.


yeah i want to make an avatar of when she rises out of the ground on that big sea-monster prop

wait why am i talking to you


i'm supposed be posting obnoxious giant pictures

(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi14.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa340%2F12_C%2Ftheindictments.jpg&hash=dede492d9bac144a1167ecbc0a2885c547b2ca52)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Miro on April 14, 2008 09:40 PM
Well Well.
I'm dashed.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 14, 2008 09:40 PM
found another one
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 14, 2008 09:41 PM
hey why the FUCK am I the only nig who wants to go to friendly's, fuck you you cop-lovin albinos im out of here
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Hammi on April 14, 2008 09:41 PM
Quote from: Zekeyi'm supposed be posting obnoxious giant pictures

(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi14.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa340%2F12_C%2Ftheindictments.jpg&hash=dede492d9bac144a1167ecbc0a2885c547b2ca52)

I have that sandwich saved in my picures folder...
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 09:42 PM
Quote from: Zekeyyeah i want to make an avatar of when she rises out of the ground on that big sea-monster prop

wait why am i talking to you
i'm supposed be posting obnoxious giant pictures

here titty dance weirded me out as well,  the way she would bend her spin


Quote from: FreekCfound another one

thats actually the one anigen was refering to.

don't you guys listen to him?
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 14, 2008 09:42 PM
SO THATS THE PATH ANIGEN TOOK

UNWISE YOUNG GRASSHOPPER

I HAVE NO GIRLFRIEND
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: psi43 on April 14, 2008 09:42 PM
Quote from: MindChamberopen system

I know that it is an open system but I know that it has rules and guidelines as well. And I didn't say that you should bring more views to our flashes, that is a result of deleting flashes that are merely made to take up space. The rules and guidelines I was talking about were CLEARLY broken by stud's flashes.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Halcion on April 14, 2008 09:44 PM
so wheres the e-drama?
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 14, 2008 09:44 PM
All a woman wants is just a little bit of attention, A LITTLE BIT OF ADMIRATION, GOD FUCK DAMNIT IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK?
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 14, 2008 09:46 PM
Quote from: MindChamber
Quote from: f0dmindchamber's a fuckin dipshit when it comes to spam
i mean he used to be friends with guys like sinista and zero but stopped talking to them once goldencat released that abusing NG book. its like he blamed us all for something one member did.
it sucks too because i bet mindchamber would be cool with us if he wasn't made biased by stamper and johnnyutah's viewpoints. i remember a few years back mindchamber nearly made a dailytoon. and tom says he would probably be interested in helping us with an experimental series if we started one

And now to the main reason I joined here.
youre a fuckin dipshit for thinking you know how I think.  no one influences the way I think,  I think the fact I have knocked heads with the team on alot shit already proves that.
and you know Shit about Sinista and I,  I love that kid like hes my brother, and we stopped talking when he headed to the services, and I got busy plain and simple. My only gripe with him and he knows this is that he spent to much time bitchin about the system than making shit.  He's really talented but got quickly discouraged when other users picked up on certain flash techniques quicker than he did,  Thats when he forced me to block him from mindchamber.net and joined SS.  Im also the main reason he got a tablet. So do me the favor and dont talk shit about something you know dick about.

jesus h christ

i wasn't forming an opinion of you based on nothing. i was forming an opinion based on what your "best bud" sinister TOLD ME about you.

and apparently you completely ignored the part where i said "we could actually get along real well" because you seem intent on coming here to fight. especially if it is, as you said, the "main reason" you joined here. i know i personally stopped wanting to "fight" newgrounds years ago. sure, i dislike some of the artists and trends on the site and im not afraid to voice my opinion of them. but i never really want to fight the staff even when it sounds like it. tom has always been cool. wade has chilled out. johnnyutah has sent me paragraphs of enraged PM rants, but i have no issue with him anymore either. and stamper... well stamper is basically an SS member i dont know why he hates us. maybe too much 4chan.

either way, the point is im done with the whole star syndicate attitude of hating everything that moves. that post was meant more as reconciliation because tom had told me you wanted to help with our series. i almost posted "someone invite mindchamber to join here" right after posting that. i have absolutely nothing against you.

Quote from: MindChamberanyways I still think alot of you guys waste waaaaay too much time bitching about stupid shit instead of just creating. You can get your point out alot more if you were just a tiny bit more constructive with your time, than trying to shit on the one site that gives you a voice.

if only you knew how much time ive put into animation and flash over the past few years. if only you knew what i went through to release the "best of" dailytoons on time so that DT artists could finally gain some recognition, only to watch them pass through judgment and out of the recent 50 with 300 views and a 3.1 because a bunch of stat whores voted on them without even clicking watch this flash. if only you knew how for the entire two months that went into preparing dailytoon 400, i worked hard every single day to try to make a higher quality flash that might finally be perceived differently by the NG audience. if only you knew how gut-wrenchingly disappointing it was to see that same flash i had put so much effort into only passed with a 3.2, the same score as EVERY OTHER DAILYTOON, even the shitty ones. if only you knew how fucking shitty i felt when the only way dt400 got on the front page was by a bunch of SS faggots bitching at tom in a news thread.

i see what you're saying about NG giving us a voice. certainly NG gives more of a voice to artists than any other website. i give you guys give full credit there, the staff is more accepting than anywhere else and the portal system is a fantastic concept. plus, none of us would have met each other without NG. im sure all of us appreciate NG for those reasons.

but the problem is this: the audience is less accepting than most other places. i think you guys misinterpret a lot of our hatred as directed towards the site itself when really its more the viewers who turn us off. they are very selective in what they watch. my two most popular flashes on NG are WadeFulp Internet Badass, a flash about newgrounds, and Ultimate Videogame Battle, a flash about videogames. i've made way higher quality flashes than those before, but none of them ever get noticed as much. in order to earn recognition, i had to conform to the tastes of the audience, and even stoop to flaming them with the Ultimate Videogame Battle. when you put so much work into making things that are somewhat worthwhile and the audience spits in your face as thanks, it is discouraging. it makes you say "fuck it, ill just submit shit to piss them off then. thats way more fun than doing all this work and in return getting heavily criticized or ignored." so maybe i brought it on myself with my earlier negative reactionary types of flashes, but so what? shouldn't a good flash get noticed anyways?

so yeah i guess im just trying to give you a peak into our side of things. sure i bitch a lot, but not about "stupid shit." and if you think i waste all of my time bitching and never make anything, you don't know me. despite my efforts on dailytoons, the majority of my work is done outside of NG because i earn a lot more recognition for it. i worked freelance making flash intros like those used in dailytoons for websites, only i got paid 20 bucks an hour to do it. i worked hard making traditional and stop motion animated shorts at the UCLA film school animation workshop. and now i'm working on animating a TV show pilot in flash.

i hope to submit more quality work to NG in the future. i plan on making an experimental flash series, similar to dailytoons but higher quality, minus the daily. and minus the stupid crew shit. the audience may not enjoy it, since they never seem to enjoy anything outside of their videogame niche. but i will still make it, and you are welcome to join us if you still want to

whoaa text wall sorry bout that guys i did it again :(
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 14, 2008 09:47 PM
^oh god, now that faggot is starting to write textwalls as well
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 09:49 PM
Quote from: ΨNicole
Quote from: MindChamberopen system

I know that it is an open system but I know that it has rules and guidelines as well. And I didn't say that you should bring more views to our flashes, that is a result of deleting flashes that are merely made to take up space. The rules and guidelines I was talking about were CLEARLY broken by stud's flashes.

ya? what about the 100s of SS flashes that use stolen music, stolen images?  and that duckspin you and rtil keep ignoring?

you're right theres plenty of rules and guidelines and your spam flashes have broken them at one point or another.

to get all righteous now because someone you don't like, is extremely hypocritical.

Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 14, 2008 09:50 PM
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi214.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fcc70%2Ffreekc99%2Fdogouch.gif&hash=189f07da3f993aeb4249594e8060fc10ff12ac67)

aww poor doggy :'(
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 14, 2008 09:50 PM
Quote from: f0dand now i'm working on animating a TV show pilot in flash.


I hope you plan on having me do some of the voice acting.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 14, 2008 09:50 PM
mindchamber get this through your head

WE DID NOT MAKE DUCKSPIN. WE FOUND IT JUST AS GAY AS YOU GUYS DID. THE CLOCK CREW MADE IT AND THE CLOCK CREW IS FUCKING GAY
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: mishkamash on April 14, 2008 09:51 PM
taylor say something quick!!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 14, 2008 09:51 PM
Quote from: MRat
Quote from: f0dand now i'm working on animating a TV show pilot in flash.


I hope you plan on having me do some of the voice acting.
voice actin already done sory bud  
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Halcion on April 14, 2008 09:52 PM
Quote from: f0dwhoaa text wall sorry bout that guys i did it again :(
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_r0n9Dv6XnY
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 14, 2008 09:52 PM
Did any of you guys read "Also sprach Zarathustra"?

If so, is this book recommendable?
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 14, 2008 09:55 PM
Quote from: MindChamberya? what about the 100s of SS flashes that use stolen music, stolen images?  and that duckspin you and rtil keep ignoring?
uh, i said a couple pages ago - we had NOTHING to do with duckspin and we do NOT think it's funny. that's some clock crew joke, we take no part in that.

and if you're going to start blabbing about 'stolen' content, take a good hard look at the top 50. SMBZ is the epitome of stolen content.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 09:56 PM
Quote from: f0dmindchamber get this through your head

WE DID NOT MAKE DUCKSPIN. WE FOUND IT JUST AS GAY AS YOU GUYS DID. THE CLOCK CREW MADE IT AND THE CLOCK CREW IS FUCKING GAY


ahh well then I stand corrected.  



Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 14, 2008 09:57 PM
I do think Nietschze is a silly man though.

But I AM starting to get really interested in Persian mythology, you know, Zarathustra and Ahura Mazda.

A student of my father gave this gigantic book to him to thank him for being a good teacher or something about Zarathustra and Persia.

A gigantic old book.
My dad didnt know what to do with it but if I get the time I'm definatly going to read it
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 14, 2008 09:57 PM
DUCKSPIN
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thinctanc.co.uk%2Fifoundaduck%2F2001%2Fduckspin.gif&hash=634d57dd2a958482e81f4f1a8f6b175433717876)
SPIN YOU FUCKER SPIN LIKE THE WIND

(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tutorialjungle.com%2Ftutorials%2Fimages%2Fspinning_1.jpg&hash=9f0bdd52c5b1ca97072c02b2a16ada968117648c)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 09:57 PM
Quote from: rtil
Quote from: MindChamberya? what about the 100s of SS flashes that use stolen music, stolen images?  and that duckspin you and rtil keep ignoring?
uh, i said a couple pages ago - we had NOTHING to do with duckspin and we do NOT think it's funny. that's some clock crew joke, we take no part in that.

and if you're going to start blabbing about 'stolen' content, take a good hard look at the top 50. SMBZ is the epitome of stolen content.


ahh come on..  you dont have to act all tuff here, no one blabberin.

if you dont like whats up there.  then make a flash and knock it off.  plain and simple

quite whinin' from the sidelines and get in the ring.  knock them off with your flashes dude, not yer bitchin'
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 14, 2008 09:58 PM
i did. it was called "flash comedy extravaganza"
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 14, 2008 10:01 PM
[size=]FOR FUCK'S SAKE PEOPLE I AM TRYING TO START AN INTELLECTUAL CONVERSATION ABOUT ZOROASTRIANISM, AN EARLY MONOTHEISTIC RELIGION, AND YOU UNEDUCATED FUCKERS HAVE TO FUCK IT UP WITH THESE UNINTERESTING RANTS ABOUT INTERNET BULLSHIT[/size]
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 10:01 PM
Quote from: rtili did. it was called "flash comedy extravaganza"


oh yeah that video game parody parody.


Still in my favs.


well then.. thats all you can do.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 14, 2008 10:03 PM
Quote from: wpsI do think Nietschze is a silly man though.

But I AM starting to get really interested in Persian mythology, you know, Zarathustra and Ahura Mazda.

A student of my father gave this gigantic book to him to thank him for being a good teacher or something about Zarathustra and Persia.

A gigantic old book.
My dad didnt know what to do with it but if I get the time I'm definatly going to read it
lmao all of a sudden your the most cultured guy here, in every other thread you're like "fuck you all faggot niggrs"

dam i luv u wally
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: texas on April 14, 2008 10:03 PM
is alien vs predator 2 any good
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 14, 2008 10:03 PM
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.agoravox.com%2FIMG%2Fjpg%2Fwarner_bros_logo.jpg&hash=19dff4644a29a3e0de02da57dac6f774c5d7301d)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 14, 2008 10:07 PM
I got this entire shelf full of mythological books here and its really fucking full yet I keep buying mythological books to feed my unhealthy obsession.

I read the entire Finnish Kalevala, it was neat

I liked the part where Väinamöinen was bleeding like crazy

Quote from: f0dlmao all of a sudden your the most cultured guy here, in every other thread you\\\'re like "fuck you all faggot niggrs"

dam i luv u wally

why thank yooooouuuuu : )
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 10:09 PM
BTW

RTil I know youre busy and shit, but I still would be totally honored if you Bombed my Bus or train.

http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/879027/1 (http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/879027/1)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 14, 2008 10:10 PM
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.telegraph.co.uk%2Farts%2Fgraphics%2F2008%2F04%2F09%2Fbtrice109.jpg&hash=d51d51bbc8650bb0ef523cedd86f0fb416278dac)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Halcion on April 14, 2008 10:10 PM
Quote from: wps[size=]FOR FUCK'S SAKE PEOPLE I AM TRYING TO START AN INTELLECTUAL CONVERSATION ABOUT ZOROASTRIANISM, AN EARLY MONOTHEISTIC RELIGION, AND YOU UNEDUCATED FUCKERS HAVE TO FUCK IT UP WITH THESE UNINTERESTING RANTS ABOUT INTERNET BULLSHIT[/size]
im sure that book was pro-gay and anti-jew
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 14, 2008 10:14 PM
Zoroastrianism actually excisted before the abrahamic faiths!
Most likely, abrahamism is a zoroastrianism rip off

I still need to know more about it, but in zoroastrianism Ahura Mazda also made man on the 6th day. However, he also made fire on the 7th day, meaning that the JEWISH GOD IS A LAZY FAGGOT COMPARED TO HIM
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: CoolDrMoney on April 14, 2008 10:25 PM
God I really want to read all of this but I have so much work to do
Im gonna be like a week behind everyone
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: psi43 on April 14, 2008 10:27 PM
Quote from: MindChamberBTW

RTil I know youre busy and shit, but I still would be totally honored if you Bombed my Bus or train.

http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/879027/1 (http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/879027/1)

wouldn't it be kind of easier for everyone if you posted the .fla?
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Halcion on April 14, 2008 10:31 PM
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcontent.ytmnd.com%2Fcontent%2Fc%2Ff%2F5%2Fcf5bf13ee5f03f6488a8a5b6b2d94e91.gif&hash=c97a3084e47fc10d50d5e3c126c33e7db53fcf83)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 10:34 PM
Quote from: ΨNicole
Quote from: MindChamberBTW

RTil I know youre busy and shit, but I still would be totally honored if you Bombed my Bus or train.

http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/879027/1 (http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/879027/1)

wouldn't it be kind of easier for everyone if you posted the .fla?

of the bus and train?  nah,, just grab the jpg from there.

the tag needs to be on a separate layer anyway because they will rotate between pieces everytime you load up the movie.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 14, 2008 10:37 PM
ok im going to bed now
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Halcion on April 14, 2008 10:42 PM
^(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fire.nist.gov%2Ffire%2Ffires%2Fbunk%2Fbunk_10.gif&hash=2502bee032333e84a7994e81c90d4d03e36e0e94)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: trent bortknob on April 14, 2008 10:44 PM
NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE ALL THE DAYS OF MY LIFE EVER SINCE IVE BEEN BORN NEVER HEARD A MAN SPEAK LIKE THIS MAN BEFORE



Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Halcion on April 14, 2008 10:46 PM
oh no music
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 14, 2008 10:49 PM
been a while since i've heard this
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 14, 2008 10:49 PM
missing child is the worst song ever made
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Halcion on April 14, 2008 10:51 PM
^ one of them
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: texas on April 14, 2008 10:53 PM
cancion del mariachi is a good song
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 14, 2008 10:55 PM
I've read some of the stuff you brought up, Waldemar Schuur, but I'm far to stupid to make an educated post about it.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: anigen on April 14, 2008 10:57 PM
Quote from: f0dmissing child is the worst song ever made

its day of the baphomets you dick!!!@
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 14, 2008 10:57 PM
Quote from: rtilbeen a while since i've heard this

so just wondering  you think you have time for that tag thing or nah?
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: trent bortknob on April 14, 2008 10:58 PM
Quote from: anigen
Quote from: f0dmissing child is the worst song ever made

its day of the baphomets you dick!!!@
and it is also really good
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 14, 2008 11:11 PM
stupid reviews part 2 eh
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: mishkamash on April 14, 2008 11:13 PM
after all that i'm pretty hard now
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Crabarms on April 14, 2008 11:15 PM
those are some stupid reviews alright.



[attachment=1352:weeding.PNG]
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 14, 2008 11:41 PM
God damn it i slept threw all the action :(
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: SHADOWFOX2 on April 14, 2008 11:45 PM
Seriously, I missed everything...
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 15, 2008 12:23 AM
Quote from: taylor
Quote from: anigen
Quote from: f0dmissing child is the worst song ever made

its day of the baphomets you dick!!!@
and it is also really good
if by "good" you mean "the most horrific nails on a chalkboard vocals ever recorded"

seriously theres a fine line between progressive rock and trash and mars volter crossed tht line!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 15, 2008 12:24 AM
Quote from: f0d
Quote from: taylor
Quote from: anigen
Quote from: f0dmissing child is the worst song ever made

its day of the baphomets you dick!!!@
and it is also really good
if by "good" you mean "the most horrific nails on a chalkboard vocals ever recorded"

seriously theres a fine line between progressive rock and trash and mars volter crossed tht line!


Well I guess I'm not cameoing your face in my FRONTPAGE FLASHES ANYMORE FAGGOT
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 15, 2008 12:25 AM
:'(
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 15, 2008 12:25 AM
Quote from: f0d:'(

Oh yah bitch feeldat bernz!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Magmar on April 15, 2008 12:28 AM
Quote from: MRat
Quote from: f0d:'(

Oh yah bitch feeldat bernz!

HE BEEN MAGMARED!!!!!!!!!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 15, 2008 12:31 AM
i cant wait till mc's graffiti contest ends I wonder if he will use my piece
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: trent bortknob on April 15, 2008 12:32 AM
Quote from: f0d
Quote from: taylor
Quote from: anigen
Quote from: f0dmissing child is the worst song ever made

its day of the baphomets you dick!!!@
and it is also really good
if by "good" you mean "the most horrific nails on a chalkboard vocals ever recorded"

seriously theres a fine line between progressive rock and trash and mars volter crossed tht line!
i like cedric's vocals!!!!!

i dont know i guess i can understand why people wouldn't like tmv but i cant understand why anyone would say that its horrible
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 15, 2008 12:36 AM
the band isnt horrible just that song
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Hammi on April 15, 2008 01:13 AM
Quote from: SHADOWFOX2Seriously, I missed everything...

This is what happened... well not entirely:
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: mishkamash on April 15, 2008 01:20 AM
i actually chuckled at what hammi drew today

oh i pulled a
HAMMI
teehehehhehehehehe
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: texas on April 15, 2008 01:23 AM
thats a nice daniel, hammi
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Hammi on April 15, 2008 01:31 AM
Quote from: MishkaMashi actually chuckled at what hammi drew today

oh i pulled a
HAMMI
teehehehhehehehehe

You pulled a...

Quote from: kianthats a nice daniel, hammi

Thank you
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Halcion on April 15, 2008 01:38 AM
MGSMGSMGSMGSMGSMGSMGS
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: CoolDrMoney on April 15, 2008 02:43 AM
Well that was a fuckin disappointment
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Sonni on April 15, 2008 02:51 AM
What the hell I just woke up this morning and voila, it's Mindchamber posting here.

Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 15, 2008 02:52 AM
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Blordow on April 15, 2008 03:14 AM
OH WHAT HAVE I MISSED OUT ON HERE? COULDNT BE BOTHERED READING ALL THESE PAGES
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 15, 2008 11:08 AM
what the fuck i just woke up and realised i was here yesterday and witnessed everything
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Sonni on April 15, 2008 02:16 PM
Yeah, sorry bout that. I'll stick to the topic now until it starts to drift off again.

Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 15, 2008 02:26 PM
lmao I got him to say "Big Sloppy Dicks"
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 15, 2008 06:59 PM
Quote
Haha and nothing the SS is crude for the sake of being crude?  oh come on.  even you cant swallow that.
anyways what could possibly be different?  you gonna show some drooling kid asking for Metalgear then crying? either way making a parody on the game, or the gamers that play it or the viewers that watch parodies of games playing it is no different.. at all..
you just do not get it haha. if you look at all the SS cartoons i am involved in only a small amount of them, and nothing i made for the SS was made in that manner.

Quote
how can you be so certain? you just said 2 seconds ago that opinions aren\\\'t facts, how can you be so certain that the reactions wouldn\\\'t be the same? what will you did if yours is  actually funnier and gets a higher score?
would the defeat the purpose?
i wouldn\\\'t really give a shit, but i\\\'m sure you would. and no i can\\\'t tell the future but i am almost completely certain the reactions will be different.

Quote
the only thing I can see that would get a different reaction, is adding screamers, popups, malicious code.
in which case, nah that aint funny. thats just a feeble attempt at trying to break the system.
no, they aren\\\'t funny, and that\\\'s not what we\\\'re doing. you simply refuse to see the difference between a mock parody and a glorified parody, because you don\\\'t want to be wrong.


Quote
duude haha,  you\\\'re full of shit... you shook his hand... if you were that hardcore you wouldn\\\'t have.

I refused to shake synjs hand, and basically called Gel out for being a bitch on NG...
He isn\\\'t a brownser.. he does his kind of flashes his way.. and that ha never changed. he isnt doing flash or game parodies or parodies based on flash collabs either.  hes doing his own thing. just as you are.
him being a brown noser has nothing to do with his cartoons, and everything i mentioned happened after comic-con. before that it was a handful of reviews i left him on his stupid blockhead cartoons.


Quoteand no one has any problems with you complaining about the NG community. it needs work. it will always need work. because its an open system.  a system that can be abused or even destroyed, but if it wasnt there, then all you have would be sites like.  flashplayer and other sites that monitor everything and limit your access.
i\\\'m quite aware of that, thanks.

Quote from: MindChamber
Quote from: rtilbeen a while since i\\\'ve heard this

so just wondering  you think you have time for that tag thing or nah?
um, probably not
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 15, 2008 07:04 PM
I can make a better piece for that thing :(

but whats with all the arguing I mean you guys obviously don't hate each other or anything I think you just like to argue to get it off your chest or something. Then again its probably best if I just stay out of it... and away... far away.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 15, 2008 07:06 PM
well he's the one who came prancing in here
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 15, 2008 07:08 PM
guess he left now i thought it was about to explode again well anyway i like both of you guys so its just kind of fun for me to watch but ye also kind of silly.

I dont know why Im saying obvious things or even posting right now.

Im gonna go to school peace out y0 have fun with the uhm

the stuff
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 15, 2008 09:18 PM
Ok, to all who missed this shit, here's a summary

[attachment=1361:shrek_2Bchild.jpg]
hello everybody i m mindchambr and i think your countercollab is shit

[attachment=1362:Assbug.gif]
I AM RTIL AND I THINK YOUR VIDEOGAME PARODIES ON NG ARE DAMAGING THE ONLINE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY AND THE ANIMATION WORLD IS SLOWLY DYING THANKS TO YOU AND YOUR EVIL ARMY OF JEWS

[attachment=1363:jry.jpg]
and so mindchamber was defeated
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 15, 2008 11:28 PM
That summary almost deserves its own cartoon.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 15, 2008 11:32 PM
Quote from: GerkinmanThat summary almost deserves its own cartoon.
I'll do it if I ever get around to it seriously fuck two-minute video presentations about communism fuck them all
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: fish on April 15, 2008 11:50 PM
aw man, I leave for a day and miss everything that just happened.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 12:34 AM
Quote from: wpsOk, to all who missed this shit, here's a summary


hello everybody i m mindchambr and i think your countercollab is shit

haha I mustve been reading the wrong forum cause I actually said your collab would be great and we should make them into one huge collab... either that your you cant read to good  

Quote
]and so mindchamber was defeated


hahah hardly. ya all started spamming the thread with pics and noises.... basically  the equivalent to sticking their fingers in their ears and screamin lalalala...


QuoteI AM RTIL AND I THINK YOUR VIDEOGAME PARODIES ON NG ARE DAMAGING THE ONLINE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY AND THE ANIMATION WORLD IS SLOWLY DYING THANKS TO YOU AND YOUR EVIL ARMY OF JEWS SO I WILL PROVE YOU ALL WRONG BY MAKING MORE VIDEOGAME PARODY PARODIES< CAUSE IM DEEP LIKE THAT

hahhah yeah thats about right.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: trent bortknob on April 16, 2008 12:37 AM
Quote from: MindChambereither that your you cant read to good  
hey at least he can write in english!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 12:42 AM
Quote from: taylor
Quote from: MindChambereither that your you cant read to good  
hey at least he can write in english!


ooh a typo sniffer.  ya you got me there. whooo  I feel so silly.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: anigen on April 16, 2008 12:46 AM
now this topic is just getting ridiculous :[
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 16, 2008 12:50 AM
And so the day is saved once again by Batman and the boy-wonder.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 12:51 AM
Quote from: anigennow this topic is just getting ridiculous :[


dude.. cmon, just have fun with it haha.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Halcion on April 16, 2008 01:18 AM
i heard some wall tearing
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 16, 2008 01:24 AM
yungjazz put them back, you hear me
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 16, 2008 01:32 AM
.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wolf on April 16, 2008 01:43 AM
Quote from: MindChamberI feel so silly.

i would feel silly if i couldnt tell the difference between parody and satire either
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: SHADOWFOX2 on April 16, 2008 02:28 AM
Quote from: Halcioni heard some wall tearing


Quote from: FreekCyungjazz put them back, you hear me

Haha OMG ROFL!!!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 02:32 AM
Quote from: rtilwell he's the one who came prancing in here

prancing?

lol I aint the one that carries a man-purse

Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wolf on April 16, 2008 02:34 AM
shut up everyone knows thats because it makes your butt look big
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 16, 2008 02:39 AM
I thought i was the only faggot prancing around these parts.

I also have a man-purce...
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 02:43 AM
Quote from: rtilyou just do not get it haha. if you look at all the SS cartoons i am involved in only a small amount of them, and nothing i made for the SS was made in that manner.
ah you only take credit for the good ones, the rest or shit.
man thats iffed up

Quote

i wouldn\\\'t really give a shit, but i\\\'m sure you would. and no i can\\\'t tell the future but i am almost completely certain the reactions will be different.
you obviously do, you are making a flash to counter an NG backed flash because you
gangsta like that, you obviously give a shit because you refuse to combine collabs.

being edgy for the sake of it

Quoteno, they aren\\\'t funny, and that\\\'s not what we\\\'re doing. you simply refuse to see the difference between a mock parody and a glorified parody, because you don\\\'t want to be wrong.
because a mock parody is just a that a parody.  Im wrong about alot of things, just not this, I\\\'ve been around NG to know that you got NG all wrong.


Quote
him being a brown noser has nothing to do with his cartoons, and everything i mentioned happened after comic-con. before that it was a handful of reviews i left him on his stupid blockhead cartoons.
if hes such a brown noser than why are you taking it out on his cartoons?
why are you calling for mass down votes, giving shit reviews?  why cant you stick to one excuse? if you hated him that much you wouldn\\\'t have even greeted him.
thats cause you are only tuff on the internet. lol


Quotei\\\'m quite aware of that, thanks.
they why aint you spaming them?  is it because we actually respect all of you as artist and allow you to bitch? and you know the minute you stirred shit on any other site they would cut you off regardless of your "E-status"

Quote from: MindChamberum, probably not

ahh well, I asked right?


Quote from: Wolf O
Quote from: MindChamberI feel so silly.

i would feel silly if i couldnt tell the difference between parody and satire either


A parody (pronounced [ˈpɛɹədiː]), in contemporary usage, is a work created to mock, comment on, or poke fun at an original work, its subject, or author, by means of humorous or satirical imitation.

lols, no wonder they call you the smart one.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: bcube on April 16, 2008 02:44 AM
Jeez, you answered a ton of his responses with questions.
When will the text walls end???
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 02:48 AM
Quote from: BizzareCubeJeez, you answered a ton of his responses with questions.
When will the text walls end???


well you can allways stick your fingers in your ears and scream lalalala by posting pictures and music.

works for the 5 year olds :-p
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 16, 2008 02:50 AM
Quotewell you can allways stick your fingers in your ears and scream lalalala by posting pictures and music.

works for the 5 year olds :-p

I dont see how that would end the text walls...

Id imagine itd just put more spacing between them.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 02:50 AM
Quoteyou just do not get it haha. if you look at all the SS cartoons i am involved in only a small amount of them, and nothing i made for the SS was made in that manner.
ah you only take credit for the good ones, ..are you saying the rest are crude and you don't do that sort of thing?
man thats iffed up.  the team leader doesn't spam with the rest of the soldiers

Quote

i wouldn't really give a shit, but i'm sure you would. and no i can't tell the future but i am almost completely certain the reactions will be different.
you obviously do, you are making a flash to counter an NG backed flash because you
gangsta like that, you obviously give a shit because you refuse to combine collabs.

being edgy for the sake of it

Quoteno, they aren't funny, and that's not what we're doing. you simply refuse to see the difference between a mock parody and a glorified parody, because you don't want to be wrong.
because a mock parody is just a that a parody.  Im wrong about alot of things, just not this, I've been around NG to know that you got NG all wrong.


Quote
him being a brown noser has nothing to do with his cartoons, and everything i mentioned happened after comic-con. before that it was a handful of reviews i left him on his stupid blockhead cartoons.

if hes such a brown noser than why are you taking it out on his cartoons?
why are you calling for mass down votes, giving shit reviews?  why cant you stick to one excuse? if you hated him that much you wouldn't have even greeted him.
thats cause you are only tuff on the internet. lol


Quotei'm quite aware of that, thanks.
they why aint you spaming them?  is it because we actually respect all of you as artist and allow you to bitch? and you know the minute you stirred shit on any other site they would cut you off regardless of your "E-status"

Quoteum, probably not

ahh well, I asked right?


Quotei would feel silly if i couldnt tell the difference between parody and satire either


A parody (pronounced [ˈpɛɹədiː]), in contemporary usage, is a work created to mock, comment on, or poke fun at an original work, its subject, or author, by means of humorous or satirical imitation.

lols, no wonder they call you the smart one.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Blordow on April 16, 2008 02:51 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVBB2upbVys
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 16, 2008 02:52 AM
Fucking well played.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wolf on April 16, 2008 02:55 AM
Quote from: MindChamber
Quote from: Wolf O
Quote from: MindChamberI feel so silly.

i would feel silly if i couldnt tell the difference between parody and satire either


A parody (pronounced [ˈpɛɹədiː]), in contemporary usage, is a work created to mock, comment on, or poke fun at an original work, its subject, or author, by means of humorous or satirical imitation.

lols, no wonder they call you the smart one.

wikipedia quoting huh?

good work

Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 02:58 AM
Quote from: GerkinmanFucking well played.

haha .

how is that well played?   we have a logical discussion,

and someone posts badboys  and thats well played?


Quote from: Wolf Owikipedia quoting huh?

good work

good work? because I know the meaning of a parody and you didn\\\'t?
I guess

lol
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 16, 2008 02:59 AM
Because you all come accross as tho your trying to be "internet badasses"

Whats that old meme, arguing on the internet is like running in a wheel chair race, even if you win your still retarded.

Also because the song is rad.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Magmar on April 16, 2008 02:59 AM
SOMEONE GET THE OINTMENT BECAUSE THERE SURE IS A LOT OF BUUUUUUUUUUUUURN IN HERE! HAHAHAAHAHAHA FUCK
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 16, 2008 03:08 AM
magnetic fluctuations on the hard drives of a few servers somewhere in Pennsylvania are very important guys!!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 16, 2008 03:23 AM
by the way in case anyone wants to make a flash out of that one guy's thing here's the voice acting shit for it

yes it's supposed to be horribly low quality and yes the voices are supposed to sound shitty like that I seriously think I drew too much inspiration of my voice acting style from peanutbutterclawk
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 03:29 AM
Quote from: GerkinmanBecause you all come across as tho your trying to be "internet badasses"

Whats that old meme, arguing on the internet is like running in a wheel chair race, even if you win your still retarded.

Also because the song is rad.

but Im not...

I just thought it was funny people where talking shit about me here.Rtil cries that no one understands him, and twists his character, but I'm supposed to let people talk about me like they know me and twist my image?  lol how does that work...So heres all this pissy whiney shittalkin from the same people  that Tom and myself support and try to front page.
so naturally i wanted to get some points across but all ya just stick your fingers in your ears like whiny bitches
how was I supposed to know you guys just want something to hate,, something to keep ya all together .
I see that now.   I should've just figured it out sooner,

eventually you will all get bored of this angsty pissy shit and actually produce something other that spam hate.

aight later.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 16, 2008 03:29 AM
wow you never learn anything do you
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 03:31 AM
Quote from: rtilwow you never learn anything do you
\
learn what?

teach me.. show the error of my ways.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 16, 2008 03:34 AM
broken record
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 03:36 AM
Quote from: rtilbroken record


really,  so I want hear you out. and thats what you give me?

you clam up?
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 16, 2008 03:37 AM
Im sorry but none of this changes the fact that its a rad song.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 16, 2008 03:38 AM
more like i'm sick of feeling like i'm talking to a wall
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Crabarms on April 16, 2008 03:44 AM
Things take time.
Can you honestly say that one days worth of skimming through the crap we post
will give you an accurate answer of what were like?
If you would read further and think beyond what you read everyone here is
developing there own creations or abominations but not everything is about
making fun of things we hate.
The same can be said to you, from what you've posted you made an ass of yourself
your probably not like that but why bother going through the trouble of picking fights,
sure defending your self is one thing as well as giving your opinion but take in account
that like you said "everyone has there opinions". Maybe your not being serious
and just getting people to respond back for shits and giggles.
Mostly people are being attacked because of taking things seriously but oh well
my point is you cant label everyone nor change someones mind by acting retarded.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 16, 2008 03:58 AM


what do you guys think of my amazing song??
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 16, 2008 03:59 AM
I think everyones to busy shitting there pants to care unfortunately :(

I cracked up at it.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Crabarms on April 16, 2008 04:00 AM
best beat boxer around
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 16, 2008 04:01 AM
This is great.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 16, 2008 04:01 AM
LMAO
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 16, 2008 04:02 AM
werd gangster
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Blordow on April 16, 2008 04:05 AM
squeef is a legend
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Professor Jaggles on April 16, 2008 04:13 AM
What is the difference between Parody and Satire? Many a young student of the humorous arts has confused or even equated the two, but this does both a disservice by oversimplifying them. They are different fruits of the same branch, both delicious in their own right, but neither exactly the same as the other.

To begin- what is parody? I could quote Websters, but would that old trick really service the discussion? Still, I suppose, in this case, where the offender started this mess with a quote from that bastard offspring of reference texts, wikipedia, an old trick may be needed. So let's look at the definition as Webster's  defines it:

Quote1  : a literary or musical work in which the style of an author or work is closely imitated for comic effect or in ridicule  
2  : a feeble or ridiculous imitation
Let's break that apart, shall we? Most of its meaning should be apparent, but examining tiny details are necessary when dealing with profound ignorance.

"For comic effect" - Parody can be seen as an homage, of sorts, a tribute to the original by pointing out the subtle peculiarities of the creative. By exaggerating these eccentricities, one may illicit laughter from his audience, but it does not necessarily connote ridicule.

"or in ridicule" - This is where overenthusiastic (or lazy) students tend to get caught up. But note this - while a parody may ridicule the flaws of a given work, it never explicitly states them. Rather, a true parody points those flaws out by exaggerating them.

"a feeble or ridiculous imitation" - this sums it up perfectly. Parody is an IMITATION, and does not step outside those bounds. What commentary it offers is neither outright stated nor immediately discernible. It may not even make a comment, preferring rather to mine for rich, sweet, laughter from the rich mines of funny that are inherent in a ludicrous situation. Parody is, above all else, about making the audience laugh. Making them laugh is secondary.

Parody is not always at the expense of the subject matter. Note this. It can be, but it isn't always. Parody is always an imitation. ALWAYS. That is what parody is. If you can remember that, you'll be fine. Parody is imitation. No exceptions.

Accepting that, let's look at satire.

I would go with a dictionary definition, but dictionaries tend to not give good example for what it is. Webster's for example says:

Quote1  : a literary work holding up human vices and follies to ridicule or scorn  
2  : trenchant wit, irony, or sarcasm used to expose and discredit vice or folly
This certainly gives you the gist of it, but you may be inclined to believe that satire cannot outright mock a certain individual. In fact, this definition makes one feel like satire has a very narrow reach, with the phrase "vice and follies" thrown about. This definition is, of course, accurate, but it doesn't give the reader an accurate PICTURE of what satire really is.

Works of satire use art to ridicule. Political figures, celebrities, institutions, abstract ideas, it doesn't matter. Whatever the target is, rather than directly parodying (read: "imitating") it, satire puts a context around it in which it can be mocked. A cartoon with a literal political boxing match, where Obama and Hilary bruise each other up, only for the winner to have to take on McCain, tired and bloodied? That's satire. A movie where bureaucracy has lead to a world where a man has to live in a cemetery after accidentally being declared legally dead? That's satire. A story about superadvanced aliens who come to earth, only to ask for directions as far away from here as possible? Shitty-ass satire. But that's beside the point.

Satire is not a mere imitation, it is commentary, a context in which a subject can be held up to derision. Can it be funny? Yes, but that's not the most important part. Satire is about criticizing something or someone by creating a situation where its flaws can be highlighted. Exaggeration can be used, but a point to be made is that it's not just an exaggeration.

So which is which? Indeed, it can be confusing sometimes.

A movie called "eXposed: an eXplanation for why eXpelled is a dumb fucking movie", a piece by piece deconstruction of all the bullshit in Ben Stein's newest movie, and probably a few testimonials from holocaust survivors who don't agree with him about the whole "darwinists caused the holocaust" thing.

It'd probably suck, full of Michael Moore-inspired "humor," but it'd be an accurate satire because it puts a context around Stein's movie and derides the fuck out of it.

A movie called "Kicked Out: The lie of a heliocentric solar system" which exposes the travesty of several scientists from Omaha U who were kicked out by the CONSPIRACY OF ZION-UH I MEAN BIG SCIENCE for their cutting-edge theories about how the earth is flat and the sun revolves around it. It would feature a droning Armenian narrator who formally worked for Nixon, who explains to us why Coperni-cists are responsible for the Armenian genocide, which he would cry about, thus guilting us into siding with him.

It'd probably be funnier than the first one, but its not really as insightful, poking fun of faults it assumes we are already aware of. Parody, an imitation of the original. It may make people more aware of the flaws in the original, but the primary purpose is to make us laugh.

Can you see the difference? Once again - Parody; imitation, Satire; a context through which derision can be delivered, like so many FedEx boxes of diarrhea. Telling the difference is the first step to true happiness. Or something like that.

I hope this has been enlightening, and now I must go, to teach experimental English in the Cornell Subbasement. Away!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 16, 2008 04:15 AM
woah. longest first post ever
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 16, 2008 04:19 AM
I feel deeply edumacated after reading that post.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: trent bortknob on April 16, 2008 04:20 AM
hly shit who the fuck is that faggot
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 16, 2008 04:21 AM
Quote from: rtilwoah. longest first post ever


and the best
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 16, 2008 04:22 AM
Professor Jaggles lmao
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: SHADOWFOX2 on April 16, 2008 04:46 AM
Wait, is his first post longer than D-Mac's?
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Professor Jaggles on April 16, 2008 04:49 AM
Quote from: taylorhly shit who the fuck is that faggot
Sir, that is just plain rude. I expect an apology forthwith!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 16, 2008 04:51 AM
QuoteSir, that is just plain rude. I expect an apology forthwith!

Do you have a monicle and twirly mustache?

Please say yes.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: SHADOWFOX2 on April 16, 2008 04:52 AM
Eh, this topic's given me a headache. I'm gonna have to read it again tomorrow, but it seems like lots of good points have been made from both sides, but 0 have been listened to...
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 16, 2008 05:07 AM
Quote from: SHADOWFOX2Eh, this topic's given me a headache. I'm gonna have to read it again tomorrow, but it seems like lots of good points have been made from both sides, but 0 have been listened to...


there is no such thing as a good point. nothing matters. ever. the universe shall right itself, no matter what.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Sonni on April 16, 2008 05:18 AM
Aw man, I'm out of popcorns. That was quite fun to read. I think FreekC is pretty pissed off right now because his topic got ruined into pieces. Heh but I doubt anybody cares.

Oh and for stupid reviews, go and watch this movie and you'll find tons of them.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/411982 (http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/411982)


Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Crabarms on April 16, 2008 05:24 AM
lol yeah
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 05:36 AM
Quote from: bugjust for the record im the one running the collab, not rtil. i dont know why you are arguing with him about it and i dont really care to go back and check. if you got a problem then PM me about it. itd look a lot better than coming onto these forums all butthurt and whiny. you can save that stuff for your newgrounds review.

haha, aint nothing you shit out that can make me whiny, you know I love your stuff, ya faggot haha. I was just giving your queen there a hard time is all,  

all in good fun yknow?   for some reason everyone is so sensitive and serious here. :(

but I'll skedaddle.  and let you guys ,,, do whatever it is ya do,

laters!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 16, 2008 05:42 AM
finally
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: CoolDrMoney on April 16, 2008 05:50 AM
Okay I will have fun

Proof that I PWNED Mindchamber http://www.thebackalleys.com/forum/index.p...;f=3&t=2583 (http://minigirls.biz/)

What a fuckin hypocrite lmao!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Professor Jaggles on April 16, 2008 05:55 AM
Quote from: MindChamber
Quote from: bugjust for the record im the one running the collab, not rtil. i dont know why you are arguing with him about it and i dont really care to go back and check. if you got a problem then PM me about it. itd look a lot better than coming onto these forums all butthurt and whiny. you can save that stuff for your newgrounds review.

haha, aint nothing you shit out that can make me whiny, you know I love your stuff, ya faggot haha. I was just giving your queen there a hard time is all,  

all in good fun yknow?   for some reason everyone is so sensitive and serious here. :(

but I'll skedaddle.  and let you guys ,,, do whatever it is ya do,

laters!
I would conjecture that this man is a homosexual if it wasn't so blatantly obvious that he is, in fact, an automaton.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: W.A.C. on April 16, 2008 06:00 AM
Quote from: MindChambereven turned down an animation job because they were hiring me only because I was Spanish. FUCK That.
I laughed so loud when I first read that. Affirmative action is such garbage.

Quote from: MindChamberI refused to shake synjs hand, and basically called Gel out for being a bitch on NG...
Wow.

Quote from: MindChamberhaha I mustve been reading the wrong forum cause I actually said your collab would be great and we should make them into one huge collab...
Combining them would would defeat the entire purpose of the alternative MGS collab. Most of the MGS shorts posted on this forum probably would've never been made if it weren't for the TBA collab's original concept.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 16, 2008 06:10 AM
Quote from: W.A.C.]
Combining them would would defeat the entire purpose of the alternative MGS collab. Most of the MGS shorts posted on this forum probably would've never been made if it weren't for the TBA collab's original concept.


You may very well be on a roll, sir.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 06:11 AM
zzz
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 16, 2008 06:12 AM
NO NO SHH QUIET  don't provoke him we finally got rid of him :(

after all that work and professor jaggles inquisitive post
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 06:17 AM
lmao edited

you know, i said i thought mindchamber could get along pretty well with us. ive completely changed my mind. and he says WE'RE the hateful and bitter ones?
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 16, 2008 06:19 AM
yeah um there's about two dozen things he accused us of that he's done to us in the past two days. but disregard all that, he's the mature adult here of course
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: W.A.C. on April 16, 2008 06:29 AM
Quote from: rtilNO NO SHH QUIET  don't provoke him we finally got rid of him :(
But I missed out on it all. >_> I originally avoided this thread because I didn't care for it's theme but then I notice how fast it grew in such a short period of time. I would read more of the threads on this forum but that would take forever to do considering how active this place has gotten and considering how I actively post on a total of 6 forums.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 06:31 AM
he was talkin to me wac you mORON
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 16, 2008 06:31 AM
lmfAO PWNT NOOBY ;^P
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: W.A.C. on April 16, 2008 06:32 AM
>_>
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 06:35 AM
<_0  (&*_*&) %$^%^_@-- _ -
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: fish on April 16, 2008 06:39 AM
I kind of like it better when someone's causing trouble in a forum somehow, even if they act stupid.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: billy on April 16, 2008 06:41 AM
1.70/50. thats under 50% making it worse than a D-, if u get below 50% you fail that subject. You failed

-------------------------------

also fuck mindchamber he is a very rude boy
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 06:46 AM
Quote from: TomI kind of like it better when someone's causing trouble in a forum somehow, even if they act stupid.
yes me too it can make for an interesting read in the case of guys like yungjazz

but mindchamber isn't stupid like yungjazz, he's just acting like a douche. seriously, who writes a sentence by sentence response like that?
he seems to think that he needs to defend himself after we all insulted him behind his back. my post was probably the one that set him off. the reality is i was expressing the hope that he WASN'T like i said he was and that we might start collaborating in harmony. obviously thats impossible if he cant post a damn thing here without picking a fight
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Philip K Dick on April 16, 2008 07:21 AM
i like mindchamber he is my homie!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 16, 2008 07:28 AM
this topic is 14 pages of teh
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 07:31 AM
Quote from: Zekeythis topic is 14 pages of teh
and i love how he says "you people posting image macros are the equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and going LALALA"

nah its more like the real life equivalent of a homeless guy rambling for hours about stupid shit no one cares about then someone finally saying "here's a quarter shut the fuck up"
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 16, 2008 07:35 AM
hey everybody go to page 12!

:*
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 07:38 AM
lmfaoo gret beatboxen
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 16, 2008 07:40 AM
i honestly think he only did it cause he doesn't want to share the spotlight

there's only room in dis town fer one metal gear collab, boy ~ Mindchamber

either way, f
i'm sure he'll give us a nice long 0 review we'll all read and laugh at when our collab gets released, despite of the collab's merits. its amusing as well that some of us WERE making parts for johnny utah's collab, but he's too busy yelling to notice
but
i dont think i'll be entering johnny utah's collab after this
i dont have much respect for the mods/admins of newgrounds period
but this is even sadder than watching Wade cavort about

i'll save "Solid Snake Does a Dance" for something else


edit: maybe bug will want it
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 07:57 AM
i wonder if mindchamber actually thought signing up here and ranting would get us to join with the main collab
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 16, 2008 07:58 AM
maybe he wanted a slice of cake
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: CoolDrMoney on April 16, 2008 08:05 AM
Kinda want to do sixstars idea for the "Mindchamber gets his dick stuck in an M+M mini's tube collab" now
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MRat on April 16, 2008 08:06 AM
Bug invited him to join. He turned it down.


Well actually he ignored it, but wHateverA!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 08:35 AM
Quote from: CoolDrMoneyKinda want to do sixstars idea for the "Mindchamber gets his dick stuck in an M+M mini\\\'s tube collab" now
lmfao yes

Quote from: MRatBug invited him to join. He turned it down.


Well actually he ignored it, but wHateverA!
and we\\\'re the pretentious elitist ones
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 16, 2008 08:36 AM
hey guys fourstar made a new "masta" movie it was awesome

i didnt know he still made movies i love his masta movies.

plus i didnt know he could ride a unicycle.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Professor Jaggles on April 16, 2008 08:38 AM
Clearly he was driven off by my insightful indictment of his sexual orientation, or rather, his lack of any such thing. Automatons can be so temperamental, sometimes, it makes me wonder why we ever constructed them in the first place. Certainly this "mindchamber" fellow cannot be used for any sort of useful task, such as applying bottle caps to bottles of carbonated drink, or spot-welding automobiles. What is his function? I can see none.

While we're on it - and I hate to speak a sentiment that may be considered "un-PC" in today's modern world, but this is the way I was raised - when I was a child, an automaton unoccupied by work today was scrap metal tomorrow. I hate to sound so judgmental, but what is the purpose of creating and supporting such machines, if they're not willing to do the labor they were built to supplement? We fired all those good gentlemen in the lower "blue collar" caste for this purpose, and now their replacements are letting us down! We can't go back to using human laborers! It will make us look weak, and we can never allow that. No, I'm afraid we must be tough with these upstart machano-men, as we would be with an unruly child. Spare the rod, spoil the robot, I always say. If we don't put the fear of god, or rather us, into their cold iron hearts now, they'll never respect us, and they'll be leeches all their lives.

Oh yes, I can hear my critics now, crying "bigot" and "anti-mechanoid" or whatever they're calling it these days. These are the arguments of foolish children and weak men - robot sympathizers are no more the friend of the metal man than I. Sure, they act like they care, standing out in the cold rain, protesting with the rest of them, but do they think that when the 'bots rise up, the sympathizers will be spared their awful, clankering wrath? Ha! Such foolish optimism. There is a line that no man can cross and on one side is the robot, and on the other side is the rest of us. So of course, I side with man. He is not the most noble of beasts, but he is my brother, and I will not abandon him. Damn the robots, and damn any man foolish enough to stand by them!

So I say, let us make an example of this "mindchamber." Let him swing from the highest steeple in town! And then, after a week, when his metal shell is rusting, and his joints are needing oil, we'll take him down and send him on his way, to tell the other robots of what we have done. And then, I tell you, they will fear us, they will revere us, and most importantly - they will respect us. We will have no more trouble from them from then on, I tell you this.

But, I fear I have gone off on a tangent. Back to grading essays on imaginary consonants. Good day to you, gentlemen.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 16, 2008 08:42 AM
I HAVE FOUND AN IMAGE MACRO
THAT SUMMARIZES THIS WHOLE THREAD:
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi30.tinypic.com%2F1zlrp8j.gif&hash=d3eab8d76b420e84550b884e92855309ffdfe0a0)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: sQueef on April 16, 2008 08:42 AM
Professor Jaggles you are amazing.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Sonni on April 16, 2008 08:46 AM
Thank you for enlightening us, professor.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 08:49 AM
Quote from: SqueefProfessor Jaggles you are amazing.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 09:59 AM
YOU'VE JUST BEEN MAGMARED
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kaboose.com%2FimageLibrary%2Fjigglypuff.jpg&hash=c04774de95781339309bb4fc6371d1443396c18f)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 16, 2008 10:11 AM
DERAIL DERAIL DERAIL

(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg440.imageshack.us%2Fimg440%2F4219%2Fjuergenhp4.jpg&hash=f200f872d3152157bb5cc2028087ebad36d152ae)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 16, 2008 10:22 AM
[size=]--------------------------------------------------
POLICE LINE / DO NOT CROSS / POLICE LIN
--------------------------------------------------[/size]
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 10:46 AM
Quote from: MRatBug invited him to join. He turned it down.


Well actually he ignored it, but wHateverA!


hahah what?  Bug never invited me , and if I have time to do both,  I would have.

Quote from: Zekeyi honestly think he only did it cause he doesn\\\'t want to share the spotlight

there\\\'s only room in dis town fer one metal gear collab, boy ~ Mindchamber

either way, f
i\\\'m sure he\\\'ll give us a nice long 0 review we\\\'ll all read and laugh at when our collab gets released, despite of the collab\\\'s merits. its amusing as well that some of us WERE making parts for johnny utah\\\'s collab, but he\\\'s too busy yelling to notice
but
i dont think i\\\'ll be entering johnny utah\\\'s collab after this
i dont have much respect for the mods/admins of newgrounds period
but this is even sadder than watching Wade cavort about

i\\\'ll save "Solid Snake Does a Dance" for something else


edit: maybe bug will want it

aww Zek, you gonna bitch out like that bro?  why is it you guys can have fun but I can\\\'t?  
and I would only put a zero in the review if it wasn\\\'t funny. I vote fairly just like you guys,  but either way you will still label me as a hypocrite cause its the thing to do.
Ive always loved your shit so, acting like all I ever do is vote zero on everything you guys do is bullshit.
omg, the conspiracy.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 16, 2008 10:47 AM
MINDCHAMBER WOULD YOU PLEASE OBEY THE TAPE IM GETTING TIRED OF YOUR SHENNANIGANS
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 10:48 AM
Quote from: f0dlmao edited

you know, i said i thought mindchamber could get along pretty well with us. ive completely changed my mind. and he says WE'RE the hateful and bitter ones?

haha changing minds is easy round these parts.  I was just havin fun ya twit

party on.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 16, 2008 10:49 AM
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 10:49 AM
Quote from: FreekCMINDCHAMBER WOULD YOU PLEASE OBEY THE TAPE IM GETTING TIRED OF YOUR SHENNANIGANS

but its morning :( its a new day,  I have my coffee in one hand and Im havin fun.

I cant for long tho cause I gotta work soon  :(
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 16, 2008 11:01 AM
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 16, 2008 11:04 AM
Quote from: MindChamberIve always loved your shit so, acting like all I ever do is vote zero on everything you guys do is bullshit.
omg, the conspiracy.


why does everyone here leap to conclusions so hard


edit:


by putting 'everyone' in that sentence, I am generalizing. Which is also, another way of jumping to conclusions.

looks like i've been magmar'd
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 11:11 AM
Quote from: f0dyes me too it can make for an interesting read in the case of guys like yungjazz

but mindchamber isn't stupid like yungjazz, he's just acting like a douche. seriously, who writes a sentence by sentence response like that?
like what?  lol

Quote
he seems to think that he needs to defend himself after we all insulted him behind his back. my post was probably the one that set him off.
ok serious talk for a sec.
.. face it, you talk alot of shit too, and that whole thread on NG demanding a lifetme achievement was pretty pathetic. especially since your plan was to smash the thing, but thats  a whole other story. And most likely just idol gossip..
but your problem is, even though you've grown as an artist you still aren't at the level where people appreciate your work. So you get pissy.. you blame everyone at NG  for your shortcomings. when in reality its none of the users fault. theres alot of excellent flashes on the top 50 with incredible animation. so your theory about NG public is flawed.  

everyone at NG appreciate all the work you put into your flashes. but you can't demand recognition, because something funnier or simpler than what you created gets the spotlight.

Quote
the reality is i was expressing the hope that he WASN'T like i said he was and that we might start collaborating in harmony. obviously thats impossible if he cant post a damn thing here without picking a fight

yes I can.  and if you read my earlier post I have.  but your idea of not picking a fight around here also means I can't disagree with some of you. and thats..sniff... just sad :(
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 16, 2008 11:18 AM
Quote from: MindChamberalot of shit
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: psi43 on April 16, 2008 11:18 AM
Quote from: MindChamberhahah what?  Bug never invited me , and if I have time to do both,  I would have.

He did, earlier in the topic he said "So you want to join or not?".
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 16, 2008 11:19 AM
Once upon a time i felt like i was popular for the wrong reasons, namely i wasnt what was popular, but rather that link and mario where popular. From that day on i swore id get popular on my own merrits. I tried and tried, but i didnt even get noticed enough to have people give me shit for it, let alone popular enough to feel good. I thus felt under appreciated.

The moral of the story is, im a gigantic faggot that likes it in the batty.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Greenkitten on April 16, 2008 11:20 AM
Quote from: LordZeebmorkflash
I have that spongebob image as my desktop background...

Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 16, 2008 11:21 AM
Quote from: Magyarage as my desk
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 11:22 AM
Quote from: ΨNicole
Quote from: MindChamberhahah what?  Bug never invited me , and if I have time to do both,  I would have.

He did, earlier in the topic he said "So you want to join or not?".

he was serious?

it didn't seem so, but if he is, then sure,  but Im gonna have to split the art between both so it wont be so great,

anyways, bug if you were serious let me know.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 16, 2008 11:24 AM
I am going to kill this thread eventually

(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg411.imageshack.us%2Fimg411%2F8813%2Fv4lcspbugjv9.png&hash=5233cd5ecf1b5eb800c9ebc8c6a926e1c498b2d0)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 16, 2008 11:26 AM
this thread will never die because everyone is too busy trying to one-up each other
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 16, 2008 11:26 AM
Quote from: MindChambertween both so it wont be so great
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 16, 2008 11:28 AM
Quotethis thread will never die because everyone is too busy trying to one-up each other

oh yeh? you think thats cool?

Well i have TWO penises!  
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 16, 2008 11:30 AM
Quote from: Gerkinmanhat
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 16, 2008 11:31 AM
Quote from: Zekeythis thread will never die because everyone is too busy trying to one-up each other
I could kill it with huge3.jpg if I felt like it but crashing browsers isn't very nice
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: Gerkinman on April 16, 2008 11:33 AM
QuoteI could kill it with huge3.jpg if I felt like it but crashing browsers isn't very nice

Superior to a rickroll tho.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: ZekeySpaceyLizard on April 16, 2008 11:34 AM
Quote from: LordZeebmork
Quote from: Zekeythis thread will never die because everyone is too busy trying to one-up each other
I could kill it with huge3.jpg if I felt like it but crashing browsers isn't very nice


neither are flamewars that last for 16 pages and accomplish nothing

i vote you post it
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 16, 2008 11:42 AM
Quote from: Zekeysh nothing
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: psi43 on April 16, 2008 11:47 AM
Quote from: MindChamber
Quote from: ΨNicole
Quote from: MindChamberhahah what?  Bug never invited me , and if I have time to do both,  I would have.

He did, earlier in the topic he said "So you want to join or not?".

he was serious?

it didn't seem so, but if he is, then sure,  but Im gonna have to split the art between both so it wont be so great,

anyways, bug if you were serious let me know.



Well, I doubt anyone would have anything against you joining the collab. Also, it doesn't have to be great.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 16, 2008 12:08 PM
well I'd say zekey has a point there

fuck this is going to crash my browser when I post it, oh well

(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fohgodhowdidigothereiamnotgoodwithcomputar.org%2FHuge%2Fhuge3.jpg&hash=7be39a1d1c4a776c400078fc0f6abb4b2d7b701a)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 12:24 PM
Quote from: ΨNicoleWell, I doubt anyone would have anything against you joining the collab. Also, it doesn't have to be great.

tru,  still gonna be tricky trying to think of something thats not MGS related but actually is.

anyways. I'll try think up some ideas at break. still kinda want an ok tho from Bug. just so I dont waist my time.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 12:32 PM
Quote from: LordZeebmorkflash
god fucking damnit I love you you goddamn piece of shit

im still laughing lmaaaaaoo
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 16, 2008 03:28 PM
ahh i'm glad i enabled scroll for overflow otherwise that image would have served its purpose
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: SHADOWFOX2 on April 16, 2008 04:05 PM
Hurray for enabling things!
Also, FreekC's recent posts are why he's a palookaloopa...
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: CoolDrMoney on April 16, 2008 06:18 PM
Quote.. face it, you talk alot of shit too, and that whole thread on NG demanding a lifetme achievement was pretty pathetic. especially since your plan was to smash the thing, but thats a whole other story. And most likely just idol gossip..
but your problem is, even though you've grown as an artist you still aren't at the level where people appreciate your work. So you get pissy.. you blame everyone at NG for your shortcomings. when in reality its none of the users fault. theres alot of excellent flashes on the top 50 with incredible animation. so your theory about NG public is flawed.

Actually this is very wrong. F0d was constantly saying he didn't want the award and infact got after us for trying to recommend him for the award. He's a pretty modest artist actually.

http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/604828 (http://minigirls.biz/)

Take a look at the post he made and tell me he was arguing for the award

Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 06:25 PM
Quote from: MindChamberok serious talk for a sec.
.. face it, you talk alot of shit too, and that whole thread on NG demanding a lifetme achievement was pretty pathetic. especially since your plan was to smash the thing, but thats  a whole other story. And most likely just idol gossip..

wow you couldn't have got a more wrong impression about that whole ordeal. honestly, i had no idea people were nominating me in that thread until about 8 pages in. i didnt do any bitching of my own AT ALL. other SS members were the ones bitching.
i actually felt like shit after that thread. not because of the nominations, it was nice that so many people wanted me to get an award. and i was just joking about smashing the trophy, of course.
but i felt really bad after lauch said "DT400 is underrated and you are all faggots!" when tom read that, he frontpaged it. a few hours later, gavin said something racist in the same thread and it got taken off the front page faster than any other flash i've ever seen.
that was pretty crushing ive got to admit. it felt like the entire two months of work we all had put into it had gone to waste. it has only taken 6 months to release part 2 because we completely lost all motivation.
honestly, you feel really fucking inadequate when a flash that you slaved over gets a 3.2 after passing judgment. then, after several days of being ignored, it gets front paged, but only because some faggot was bitching at an admin about it. then they do so much bitching, it gets taken off the FP prematurely. i dunno to me it felt like the ultimate failure. i wouldve been happier if it hadnt got FP at all.

Quote from: MindChamberbut your problem is, even though you've grown as an artist you still aren't at the level where people appreciate your work. So you get pissy.. you blame everyone at NG  for your shortcomings. when in reality its none of the users fault. theres alot of excellent flashes on the top 50 with incredible animation. so your theory about NG public is flawed.  

everyone at NG appreciate all the work you put into your flashes. but you can't demand recognition, because something funnier or simpler than what you created gets the spotlight.
i smell a contradiction
"you've grown as an artist you still aren't at the level where people appreciate your work"
"everyone at NG appreciate all the work you put into your flashes"
face it, the first one is the only one thats true

the top 50 is good for the most part, but you can't deny that the flashes there now are simply not as good as some of the flashes that used to be there. all of the old classic flashes would peak at around 4.2, and now theyve been pushed out of the top 50 by this new generation of users that overrates everything videogame or newgrounds related into the 4.6 range.

anyways if i submitted my best material i could probably be in the top 50 myself. i just have no desire to please NG's target audience anymore. i know what works on NG and what doesn't work, and i simply do not want to conform to what works. consider my two flashes that have actually earned significant attention, WadeFulp Internet Badass and Ultimate Videogame Battle. that pretty much says it all right there. in order to make a popular flash, i had to leach off the popularity of something else that is more popular with NG users. in the 2 years since i made those, ive made way higher quality material that few besides SS members have noticed

regardless, my theory about the NG public doesnt concern the top 50. it concerns the judgment system, which is flawed beyond recognition. even you cant deny that
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 06:29 PM
I like humming birds
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 06:30 PM
lmao stop with the minigirls
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 06:31 PM
ok if all these shitty flamewars and textwalls continue we should all evacuate to my forum ok?!!?!!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: billy on April 16, 2008 06:39 PM
say goodbye to this thread.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: billy on April 16, 2008 06:49 PM
I mean it, say goodbye
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 16, 2008 07:11 PM
goodbye my lover

goodbye my friend

[size=]------------------------------------------
FBI / DO NOT CROSS / FBI / DO N
------------------------------------------
[/size]
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 07:15 PM
RIGHT THERE
BELOW THE OCEAN
THERE I WANT TO BE
SHE MAY BE
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: billy on April 16, 2008 07:17 PM
let the motherfucker burn
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 07:29 PM
LET THIS THREAD STAY ALIVE
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: billy on April 16, 2008 07:42 PM
I WANT TO KILL THIS THREAD SO BAD BUT I'M AFRAID I'LL GET IN TROUBLE.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 07:49 PM
double trouble
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsuperyo.nuxit.net%2FRazmoket%2Fobjets%2Fk7%2Fdouble_trouble.jpg&hash=a98d39f1f83dea5cda3b8d6ed2d5b7482b3b0d96)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 07:57 PM
Quote from: f0dbut i felt really bad after lauch said "DT400 is underrated and you are all faggots!" when tom read that, he frontpaged it. a few hours later, gavin said something racist in the same thread and it got taken off the front page faster than any other flash i've ever seen.
that was pretty crushing ive got to admit. it felt like the entire two months of work we all had put into it had gone to waste. it has only taken 6 months to release part 2 because we completely lost all motivation.
you lost motivation, but Tom didnt take it down because someone said something stupid,,,, again,  he took it down because it wasn't really getting a better score from being there. again, you gotta do what you feel good about, if your ss crew likes your shit and you like you shit, nothing really matter. any other props should be just icing anyways and not the goal.
Quote
honestly, you feel really fucking inadequate when a flash that you slaved over gets a 3.2 after passing judgment. then, after several days of being ignored, it gets front paged, but only because some faggot was bitching at an admin about it. then they do so much bitching, it gets taken off the FP prematurely. i dunno to me it felt like the ultimate failure. i wouldve been happier if it hadnt got FP at all.
well it got taken off because it wasn't doing well.
tom factors in his decision along with scores and  hits. it really makes sense and its only fair.
think about every blockbuster movie thats ever bombed. all the hard work that goes into that.
I mean shit stuntman died in waterworld, and that still turned out a mess.
sometimes shit don't go as planned.  you cant be mad at the world for it.

Quote
i smell a contradiction
"you've grown as an artist you still aren't at the level where people appreciate your work"
"everyone at NG appreciate all the work you put into your flashes"
face it, the first one is the only one thats true
yeah well NG appreciates but it still needs work bro. you could A) work on getting better, or B. spam the portal and call everyone that votes low on your stuff morons and assholes.

Quote
the top 50 is good for the most part, but you can't deny that the flashes there now are simply not as good as some of the flashes that used to be there. all of the old classic flashes would peak at around 4.2, and now theyve been pushed out of the top 50 by this new generation of users that overrates everything videogame or newgrounds related into the 4.6 range.
videogames are relevant.  its a sad fact, but thats what people like. Tom started the site doing parodies on games celebrities and movies. its whats relevant and you cant get mad at it.

point me to any animator and I can show you what what style they use and what was relevent to that style.  Bug and Zek like to kick it oldschool. and those old school toons were all about parodies of stars, imitations of vaudeville slapstick.. basically what was relevant. and Im sure there where hecklers back then that got tired of it like you did,

Quote
anyways if i submitted my best material i could probably be in the top 50 myself. i just have no desire to please NG's target audience anymore. i know what works on NG and what doesn't work, and i simply do not want to conform to what works. consider my two flashes that have actually earned significant attention, WadeFulp Internet Badass and Ultimate Videogame Battle. that pretty much says it all right there. in order to make a popular flash, i had to leach off the popularity of something else that is more popular with NG users. in the 2 years since i made those, ive made way higher quality material that few besides SS members have noticed
if you are trying to make "art" then you should be satisfied with your work regardless of views.

Quoteregardless, my theory about the NG public doesn't concern the top 50. it concerns the judgment system, which is flawed beyond recognition. even you cant deny that
every system has its flaws, nothing is ever perfect. and considering this is the only flash site that allows its viewer to delete its content, its still the most ambitious.
the truth is , you need to get better.  theres no way around it.  no real excuses can be made.
while there are gimmick flashes getting alot of hits. its the ones showing any real skill that hold out the longest
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 08:01 PM
Ok im gonna try to make this an intelligent conversation again


I, as a Batavian supremacist am convinced that the Batavians that betrayed Julius Civilis were actually Belgians, preventing the mighty Batavians from smashing the entire Roman empire and taking over whole Europe.

DISCUSS

(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.romanaqueducts.info%2Faquasite%2Ffoto%2Fcivilis_julius.jpg&hash=cf69f1087f4dbf0619b01cb01021011fa10126c0)
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 16, 2008 08:04 PM
veni, vidi, vici
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: billy on April 16, 2008 08:04 PM
I swear I'm going to blow this thread sky high if you don't stop posting
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 08:05 PM
Belgians are the scourge of our planet,
us Batavians, who both carry the blood of Atlanteans, Mongols and Jotuns have been BETRAYED BY THE VILE SERPENTS
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 16, 2008 08:06 PM
I thought I killed this thing earlier today goddamnit, what happened?
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: billy on April 16, 2008 08:06 PM
are you taunting me???? I really will do it!!!!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 08:08 PM
what happened? MINDCHAMBER STILL LIVES, AND HES OUT TO POST MORE STUPID SHIT, LOOK OUT!!!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 16, 2008 08:12 PM
Quote from: rtilahh i'm glad i enabled scroll for overflow otherwise that image would have served its purpose
what the hell

it fucked firefox and safari over
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: billy on April 16, 2008 08:13 PM
MindChamber, the blood will be on your hands.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 08:15 PM
Mindchamber, rtil's shit will be on your hands
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 16, 2008 08:16 PM
mindchambers posting his name is itallic ghhahaaaga
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: billy on April 16, 2008 08:16 PM
he's still reading this topic which means he's typing up a big ol' post probably, somebody better im him that his next post will mean the end of the thread. I cannot allow this thread to reach 19 pages.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 08:17 PM
Quote from: Billy MonksI swear I'm going to blow this thread sky high if you don't stop posting

im not really sure what you are bitchin about, f0d isnt fighting and neither am I.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 08:17 PM
wait but his name isnt itallic right now


damn this is exciting

EDIT: oh he just posted that explainezs it!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: billy on April 16, 2008 08:19 PM
Quote from: MindChamber
Quote from: Billy MonksI swear I'm going to blow this thread sky high if you don't stop posting

im not really sure what you are bitchin about, f0d isnt fighting and neither am I.
If a thread grows to 19 pages long its doom is inevitable.
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 08:21 PM
Quote from: Billy Monks
Quote from: MindChamber
Quote from: Billy MonksI swear I'm going to blow this thread sky high if you don't stop posting

im not really sure what you are bitchin about, f0d isnt fighting and neither am I.
If a thread grows to 19 pages long its doom is inevitable.


lols, what am I thinkin... nvm
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 16, 2008 08:21 PM
okay, time to kill this thread!!
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 08:23 PM
what do you call a chamber full of mint?
a mintchamber

BOOYA!

Quote from: MindChamberlols, what am I thinkin... nvm


yo im mindchambr and i use 1337 acronimz lik lol and nvm BITCH
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 16, 2008 08:23 PM
Alan Wood's Unicode Resources

Test for Unicode support in Web browsers

C0 Controls and Basic Latin

U+0000 – U+007F   (0–127)

      
Samples       Latin-1 Supplement
These characters correspond to those in the 7-bit ASCII character set, and all of them are present in the ANSI character set and in Microsoft's WGL4 character set. Additional Latin characters can be found in Latin-1 Supplement, Latin Extended-A, Latin Extended-B, Latin Extended-C, Latin Extended-D, Latin Extended Additional and Alphabetic Presentation Forms.

The characters that appear in the first column of the following table depend on the browser that you are using, the fonts installed on your computer, and the browser options you have chosen that determine the fonts used to display particular character sets, encodings or languages.

If you are not familiar with the characters, you can check the characters displayed here with the graphical display at http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0000.pdf (http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0000.pdf).

Character   Decimal   Hex   Name
' '   32   0020   SPACE
!   33   0021   EXCLAMATION MARK
"   34   0022   QUOTATION MARK   (entity name is &quot;)
#   35   0023   NUMBER SIGN
$   36   0024   DOLLAR SIGN
%   37   0025   PERCENT SIGN
&   38   0026   AMPERSAND   (entity name is &amp;)
'   39   0027   APOSTROPHE
(   40   0028   LEFT PARENTHESIS
)   41   0029   RIGHT PARENTHESIS
*   42   002A   ASTERISK
+   43   002B   PLUS SIGN
,   44   002C   COMMA
-   45   002D   HYPHEN-MINUS
.   46   002E   FULL STOP
/   47   002F   SOLIDUS
0   48   0030   DIGIT ZERO
1   49   0031   DIGIT ONE
2   50   0032   DIGIT TWO
3   51   0033   DIGIT THREE
4   52   0034   DIGIT FOUR
5   53   0035   DIGIT FIVE
6   54   0036   DIGIT SIX
7   55   0037   DIGIT SEVEN
8   56   0038   DIGIT EIGHT
9   57   0039   DIGIT NINE
:   58   003A   COLON
;   59   003B   SEMICOLON
<   60   003C   LESS-THAN SIGN   (entity name is &lt;)
=   61   003D   EQUALS SIGN
>   62   003E   GREATER-THAN SIGN   (entity name is &gt;)
?   63   003F   QUESTION MARK
@   64   0040   COMMERCIAL AT
A   65   0041   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A
B   66   0042   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER B
C   67   0043   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C
D   68   0044   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D
E   69   0045   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E
F   70   0046   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER F
G   71   0047   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G
H   72   0048   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H
I   73   0049   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I
J   74   004A   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER J
K   75   004B   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER K
L   76   004C   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L
M   77   004D   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER M
N   78   004E   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N
O   79   004F   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O
P   80   0050   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER P
Q   81   0051   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Q
R   82   0052   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER R
S   83   0053   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER S
T   84   0054   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER T
U   85   0055   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U
V   86   0056   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER V
W   87   0057   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W
X   88   0058   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER X
Y   89   0059   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y
Z   90   005A   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Z
[   91   005B   LEFT SQUARE BRACKET
\   92   005C   REVERSE SOLIDUS
]   93   005D   RIGHT SQUARE BRACKET
^   94   005E   CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT
_   95   005F   LOW LINE
`   96   0060   GRAVE ACCENT
a   97   0061   LATIN SMALL LETTER A
b   98   0062   LATIN SMALL LETTER B
c   99   0063   LATIN SMALL LETTER C
d   100   0064   LATIN SMALL LETTER D
e   101   0065   LATIN SMALL LETTER E
f   102   0066   LATIN SMALL LETTER F
g   103   0067   LATIN SMALL LETTER G
h   104   0068   LATIN SMALL LETTER H
i   105   0069   LATIN SMALL LETTER I
j   106   006A   LATIN SMALL LETTER J
k   107   006B   LATIN SMALL LETTER K
l   108   006C   LATIN SMALL LETTER L
m   109   006D   LATIN SMALL LETTER M
n   110   006E   LATIN SMALL LETTER N
o   111   006F   LATIN SMALL LETTER O
p   112   0070   LATIN SMALL LETTER P
q   113   0071   LATIN SMALL LETTER Q
r   114   0072   LATIN SMALL LETTER R
s   115   0073   LATIN SMALL LETTER S
t   116   0074   LATIN SMALL LETTER T
u   117   0075   LATIN SMALL LETTER U
v   118   0076   LATIN SMALL LETTER V
w   119   0077   LATIN SMALL LETTER W
x   120   0078   LATIN SMALL LETTER X
y   121   0079   LATIN SMALL LETTER Y
z   122   007A   LATIN SMALL LETTER Z
{   123   007B   LEFT CURLY BRACKET
|   124   007C   VERTICAL LINE
}   125   007D   RIGHT CURLY BRACKET
~   126   007E   TILDE
   127   007F   <control>
      
       Latin-1 Supplement
Copyright © 1999–2006 Alan Wood

The hexadecimal numbers and the character names in the above table are taken from the Unicode 3.0 Character Database, Copyright © 1991–1999 Unicode, Inc., as contained in UnicodeData-Latest.txt on the Unicode ftp site (ftp://ftp.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/) in October 1999.

Created 3rd February 1999   Last updated 21st July 2006

Send comments or questions to Alan Wood

| Contents | Site Map | Unicode Fonts | Unicode Web Browsers | Unicode Programs |

Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 08:24 PM
Quote from: MindChamberagain, you gotta do what you feel good about, if your ss crew likes your shit and you like you shit, nothing really matter. any other props should be just icing anyways and not the goal.

yes thats what i realized in the past few months. the full version of that flash is coming out on the 23rd btw

Quote from: MindChamberwell it got taken off because it wasn't doing well.
tom factors in his decision along with scores and  hits. it really makes sense and its only fair.
think about every blockbuster movie thats ever bombed. all the hard work that goes into that.
I mean shit stuntman died in waterworld, and that still turned out a mess.
sometimes shit don't go as planned.  you cant be mad at the world for it.

none of our shit ever seems to do well when tom frontpages it. quite simply, its because we dont conform to what the NG audience wants *cough* videgames *cough* but i still appreciate tom for doing it

Quote
yeah well NG appreciates but it still needs work bro. you could A) work on getting better, or B. spam the portal and call everyone that votes low on your stuff morons and assholes.
people dont seem to realize this about the SS. when we were spamming the portal, we were actually working on getting better at the same time. killing two birds with one stone. i got better at animating from making dailytoons than i did taking 4 years of traditional animation classes, 2 advanced flash classes, and 3 ucla animation workshop classes. no lie.

Quote
if you are trying to make "art" then you should be satisfied with your work regardless of views.

yes as i said i have come to realize this fact. i dont know what payoff i was expecting from dt400 i guess i just didnt expect so many people to outright hate it like they did.

Quoteevery system has its flaws, nothing is ever perfect. and considering this is the only flash site that allows its viewer to delete its content, its still the most ambitious.

agreed
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 08:24 PM
I'M A THIEF
I'M A LIAR
THERE'S MY CHURCH I SING IN DA CHOIR
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 16, 2008 08:25 PM
umm yeh nothing will be appreciated by the ng audience unless it's regurgitated bullshit, the small mind of the average ng user can't handle anything remotely different from the formula

anyway I should be killing this thread so

Alan Wood's Unicode Resources

Test for Unicode support in Web browsers

C1 Controls and Latin-1 Supplement

U+0080 – U+00FF   (128–255)

      
Basic Latin       Latin Extended-A
These characters are used with Basic Latin. All of the characters from 160 to 255 are present in Microsoft's WGL4 character set and in the ANSI character set. The ANSI and MacRoman character sets assign printable characters to many of the controls (128-159), and these characters are likely to appear in the table below if you are using Microsoft Windows or Mac OS. Characters 160-163, 165, 167-172, 174-177, 180-184, 186, 187, 191-207, 209-214, 216-220, 223-239, 241-252 and 255 provide Unicode equivalents for some of the characters in Apple's MacRoman character set. Characters 169, 172, 174, 177, 215 and 247 provide Unicode equivalents for some of the characters in Monotype's Symbol font.

The characters that appear in the first column of the following table depend on the browser that you are using, the fonts installed on your computer, and the browser options you have chosen that determine the fonts used to display particular character sets, encodings or languages. If you are using a version of Windows that supports a non-Latin alphabet such as Arabic, Cyrillic, Greek, Hebrew or Thai, then characters from these scripts may replace some of those in the 128-255 range. This happens because the characters for these non-Latin scripts are coded to the same numbers as the accented Latin characters in the ANSI character set; this problem will be resolved when Unicode becomes more widely used, because it provides a unique numeric identifier for each character.

The entries in the "Entity" column are character entity references that can be used in HTML pages.

If you are not familiar with the characters, you can check the characters displayed here with the graphical display at http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0080.pdf (http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0080.pdf).

Character
(decimal)   Decimal   Character
(hex)   Hex   Character
(entity)   Entity   Name
€   128   €   0080           <control> [ANSI - euro sign; MacRoman - A diaeresis]
?   129   ?   0081           <control> [MacRoman - A ring above]
,   130   ,   0082           <control> [ANSI - single low-9 quotation mark; MacRoman - C cedilla]
ƒ   131   ƒ   0083           <control> [ANSI - f with hook; MacRoman - E acute]
,,   132   ,,   0084           <control> [ANSI - double low-9 quotation mark; MacRoman - N tilde]
...   133   ...   0085           <control> [ANSI - horizontal ellipsis; MacRoman - O diaeresis]
†   134   †   0086           <control> [ANSI - dagger; MacRoman - U diaeresis]
‡   135   ‡   0087           <control> [ANSI - double dagger; MacRoman - a acute]
ˆ   136   ˆ   0088           <control> [ANSI - modifier letter circumflex accent; MacRoman - a grave]
‰   137   ‰   0089           <control> [ANSI - per mille sign; MacRoman - a circumflex]
Š   138   Š   008A           <control> [ANSI - S caron; MacRoman - a diaeresis]
‹   139   ‹   008B           <control> [ANSI - single left-pointing angle quotation mark; MacRoman - a tilde]
Œ   140   Œ   008C           <control> [ANSI - OE ligature; MacRoman - a ring above]
?   141   ?   008D           <control> [MacRoman - c cedilla]
Ž   142   Ž   008E           <control> [ANSI - Z caron; MacRoman - e acute]
?   143   ?   008F           <control> [MacRoman - e grave]
?   144   ?   0090           <control> [MacRoman - e circumflex]
'   145   '   0091           <control> [ANSI - left single quotation mark; MacRoman - e diaeresis]
'   146   '   0092           <control> [ANSI - right single quotation mark; MacRoman - i acute]
"   147   "   0093           <control> [ANSI - left double quotation mark; MacRoman - i grave]
"   148   "   0094           <control> [ANSI - right double quotation mark; MacRoman - i circumflex]
•   149   •   0095           <control> [ANSI - bullet; MacRoman - i diaeresis]
–   150   –   0096           <control> [ANSI - en dash; MacRoman - n tilde]
—   151   —   0097           <control> [ANSI - em dash; MacRoman - o acute]
˜   152   ˜   0098           <control> [ANSI - small tilde; MacRoman - o grave]
™   153   ™   0099           <control> [ANSI - trade mark sign; MacRoman - o circumflex]
š   154   š   009A           <control> [ANSI - s caron; MacRoman - o diaeresis]
›   155   ›   009B           <control> [ANSI - single right-pointing angle quotation mark; MacRoman - o tilde]
œ   156   œ   009C           <control> [ANSI - oe ligature; MacRoman - u acute]
?   157   ?   009D           <control> [MacRoman - u grave]
ž   158   ž   009E           <control> [ANSI - z caron; MacRoman - u circumflex]
Ÿ   159   Ÿ   009F           <control> [ANSI - Y diaeresis; MacRoman - u diaeresis]
' '   160   ' '   00A0   ' '   &nbsp;   NO-BREAK SPACE
¡   161   ¡   00A1   ¡   &iexcl;   INVERTED EXCLAMATION MARK
¢   162   ¢   00A2   ¢   &cent;   CENT SIGN
£   163   £   00A3   £   &pound;   POUND SIGN   [lira sign is ? - ₤]
¤   164   ¤   00A4   ¤   &curren;   CURRENCY SIGN
¥   165   ¥   00A5   ¥   &yen;   YEN SIGN
¦   166   ¦   00A6   ¦   &brvbar;   BROKEN BAR
§   167   §   00A7   §   &sect;   SECTION SIGN
¨   168   ¨   00A8   ¨   &uml;   DIAERESIS
©   169   ©   00A9   ©   &copy;   COPYRIGHT SIGN   (present in Symbol font)
ª   170   ª   00AA   ª   &ordf;   FEMININE ORDINAL INDICATOR
«   171   «   00AB   «   &laquo;   LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE ANGLE QUOTATION MARK
¬   172   ¬   00AC   ¬   &not;   NOT SIGN   (present in Symbol font)
­   173   ­   00AD   ­   &shy;   SOFT HYPHEN
®   174   ®   00AE   ®   &reg;   REGISTERED SIGN   (present in Symbol font)
¯   175   ¯   00AF   ¯   &macr;   MACRON
°   176   °   00B0   °   &deg;   DEGREE SIGN
±   177   ±   00B1   ±   &plusmn;   PLUS-MINUS SIGN   (present in Symbol font)
²   178   ²   00B2   ²   &sup2;   SUPERSCRIPT TWO
³   179   ³   00B3   ³   &sup3;   SUPERSCRIPT THREE
´   180   ´   00B4   ´   &acute;   ACUTE ACCENT
µ   181   µ   00B5   µ   &micro;   MICRO SIGN
¶   182   ¶   00B6   ¶   &para;   PILCROW SIGN
·   183   ·   00B7   ·   &middot;   MIDDLE DOT
¸   184   ¸   00B8   ¸   &cedil;   CEDILLA
¹   185   ¹   00B9   ¹   &sup1;   SUPERSCRIPT ONE
º   186   º   00BA   º   &ordm;   MASCULINE ORDINAL INDICATOR
»   187   »   00BB   »   &raquo;   RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE ANGLE QUOTATION MARK
¼   188   ¼   00BC   ¼   &frac14;   VULGAR FRACTION ONE QUARTER
½   189   ½   00BD   ½   &frac12;   VULGAR FRACTION ONE HALF
¾   190   ¾   00BE   ¾   &frac34;   VULGAR FRACTION THREE QUARTERS
¿   191   ¿   00BF   ¿   &iquest;   INVERTED QUESTION MARK
À   192   À   00C0   À   &Agrave;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH GRAVE
Á   193   Á   00C1   Á   &Aacute;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH ACUTE
   194   Â   00C2   Â   &Acirc;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH CIRCUMFLEX
à  195   Ã   00C3   Ã   &Atilde;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH TILDE
Ä   196   Ä   00C4   Ä   &Auml;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH DIAERESIS
Å   197   Å   00C5   Å   &Aring;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH RING ABOVE
Æ   198   Æ   00C6   Æ   &AElig;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER AE
Ç   199   Ç   00C7   Ç   &Ccedil;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH CEDILLA
È   200   È   00C8   È   &Egrave;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH GRAVE
É   201   É   00C9   É   &Eacute;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH ACUTE
Ê   202   Ê   00CA   Ê   &Ecirc;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH CIRCUMFLEX
Ë   203   Ë   00CB   Ë   &Euml;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH DIAERESIS
Ì   204   Ì   00CC   Ì   &Igrave;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH GRAVE
Í   205   Í   00CD   Í   &Iacute;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH ACUTE
Π  206   Î   00CE   Î   &Icirc;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH CIRCUMFLEX
Ï   207   Ï   00CF   Ï   &Iuml;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH DIAERESIS
Р  208   Ð   00D0   Ð   &ETH;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER ETH
Ñ   209   Ñ   00D1   Ñ   &Ntilde;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH TILDE
Ò   210   Ò   00D2   Ò   &Ograve;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH GRAVE
Ó   211   Ó   00D3   Ó   &Oacute;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH ACUTE
Ô   212   Ô   00D4   Ô   &Ocirc;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH CIRCUMFLEX
Õ   213   Õ   00D5   Õ   &Otilde;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH TILDE
Ö   214   Ö   00D6   Ö   &Ouml;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH DIAERESIS
×   215   ×   00D7   ×   &times;   MULTIPLICATION SIGN   (present in Symbol font)
Ø   216   Ø   00D8   Ø   &Oslash;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH STROKE
Ù   217   Ù   00D9   Ù   &Ugrave;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH GRAVE
Ú   218   Ú   00DA   Ú   &Uacute;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH ACUTE
Û   219   Û   00DB   Û   &Ucirc;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH CIRCUMFLEX
Ü   220   Ü   00DC   Ü   &Uuml;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH DIAERESIS
Ý   221   Ý   00DD   Ý   &Yacute;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH ACUTE
Þ   222   Þ   00DE   Þ   &THORN;   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER THORN
ß   223   ß   00DF   ß   &szlig;   LATIN SMALL LETTER SHARP S
à   224   à   00E0   à   &agrave;   LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH GRAVE
á   225   á   00E1   á   &aacute;   LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH ACUTE
â   226   â   00E2   â   &acirc;   LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH CIRCUMFLEX
ã   227   ã   00E3   ã   &atilde;   LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH TILDE
ä   228   ä   00E4   ä   &auml;   LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH DIAERESIS
å   229   å   00E5   å   &aring;   LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH RING ABOVE
æ   230   æ   00E6   æ   &aelig;   LATIN SMALL LETTER AE
ç   231   ç   00E7   ç   &ccedil;   LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CEDILLA
è   232   è   00E8   è   &egrave;   LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH GRAVE
é   233   é   00E9   é   &eacute;   LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH ACUTE
ê   234   ê   00EA   ê   &ecirc;   LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH CIRCUMFLEX
ë   235   ë   00EB   ë   &euml;   LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH DIAERESIS
ì   236   ì   00EC   ì   &igrave;   LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH GRAVE
í   237   í   00ED   í   &iacute;   LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH ACUTE
î   238   î   00EE   î   &icirc;   LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH CIRCUMFLEX
ï   239   ï   00EF   ï   &iuml;   LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH DIAERESIS
ð   240   ð   00F0   ð   &eth;   LATIN SMALL LETTER ETH
ñ   241   ñ   00F1   ñ   &ntilde;   LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH TILDE
ò   242   ò   00F2   ò   &ograve;   LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH GRAVE
ó   243   ó   00F3   ó   &oacute;   LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH ACUTE
ô   244   ô   00F4   ô   &ocirc;   LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH CIRCUMFLEX
õ   245   õ   00F5   õ   &otilde;   LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH TILDE
ö   246   ö   00F6   ö   &ouml;   LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH DIAERESIS
÷   247   ÷   00F7   ÷   &divide;   DIVISION SIGN   (present in Symbol font)
ø   248   ø   00F8   ø   &oslash;   LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH STROKE
ù   249   ù   00F9   ù   &ugrave;   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH GRAVE
ú   250   ú   00FA   ú   &uacute;   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH ACUTE
û   251   û   00FB   û   &ucirc;   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH CIRCUMFLEX
ü   252   ü   00FC   ü   &uuml;   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH DIAERESIS
ý   253   ý   00FD   ý   &yacute;   LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH ACUTE
þ   254   þ   00FE   þ   &thorn;   LATIN SMALL LETTER THORN
ÿ   255   ÿ   00FF   ÿ   &yuml;   LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH DIAERESIS
      
Basic Latin       Latin Extended-A
Copyright © 1999–2002 Alan Wood

The hexadecimal numbers and the character names in the above table are taken from the Unicode 3.0 Character Database, Copyright © 1991–1999 Unicode, Inc., as contained in UnicodeData-Latest.txt on the Unicode ftp site (ftp://ftp.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/) in October 1999.

Created 3rd February 1999   Last updated 8th November 2002

Send comments or questions to Alan Wood

| Contents | Site Map | Unicode Fonts | Unicode Web Browsers | Unicode Programs |

Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 16, 2008 08:26 PM






Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 16, 2008 08:27 PM
Alan Wood's Unicode Resources

Test for Unicode support in Web browsers

Latin Extended-A

U+0100 – U+017F   (256–383)

      
Latin-1 Supplement       Latin Extended-B
These characters are used with Basic Latin. All of these characters are present in Microsoft's WGL4 character set. Characters 338, 339, 352, 353, 376, 381 and 382 provide Unicode equivalents for some of the characters in the ANSI character set. Characters 305, 338, 339 and 376 provide Unicode equivalents for four of the characters in Apple's MacRoman character set.

The characters that appear in the first column of the following table depend on the browser that you are using, the fonts installed on your computer, and the browser options you have chosen that determine the fonts used to display particular character sets, encodings or languages.

You can find some or all of the characters in this range in the Windows Unicode fonts Aboriginal Sans, Aboriginal Serif, AiPaiNutaaq (few), Akaash, Albany, Alkaios, ALPHABETUM Unicode, Andale Mono, Andale Sans, Andale Sans UI, Andron Scriptor Web, AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni, AR PL ZenKai Uni, Arabic Typesetting, Arev Sans, Arial, Arial Black, Arial Narrow, Arial Unicode MS, AttikaU, BabelStone Phags-pa Book, Baekmuk Batang, Baekmuk Dotum, Baekmuk Gulim, Baekmuk Headline, Ballymun RO, Batang, BatangChe, Berling Antiqua, Bitstream CyberBase, Bitstream CyberBit, Bitstream CyberCJK, Book Antiqua, Bookman Old Style, BosporosU, Calibri, Cambria, Cambria Math, Candara, Cardo, Caslon, Century, Century Gothic, Century Schoolbook, Chandas, Charis SIL, Chrysanthi Unicode, CN-Arial, CN-Times, Code2000, Comic Sans MS, Consolas, Constantia, Corbel, Courier MonoThai, Courier New, Cumberland, DejaVu Sans, DejaVu Sans Condensed, DejaVu Sans Mono, DejaVu Serif, DejaVu Serif Condensed, Dialekt Uni, Doulos SIL, Ekushey Azad, Ekushey Durga, Ekushey Puja, Ekushey Punarbhaba, Ekushey Saraswatii, Ekushey Sharifa, Ekushey Sumit, e-PhonTranslit UNI, ESL Gothic Unicode, Everson Mono Unicode, Fixedsys Excelsior, FMBF Bardi, Franklin Gothic, Franklin Gothic Cond, Free Monospaced, Free Sans, Free Serif, Frutiger Linotype, Gandhari Unicode, Garamond, Garava, Gentium, GentiumAlt, Georgia, GFS Bodoni, GFS Didot, GFS Neohellenic, Gisha (few), Gulim Che, Gungsuh, GungsuhChe, Haettenschweiler, HAN NOM A, HAN NOM B, Hapax Berbère (few), Hapax Touareg (few), Hapax Touareg DàG (few), Hindsight Unicode, HY Shin Myeongjo Std Acro, Impact, Iskoola Pota (few), jGaramond, Jomolhari, Junicode, KadmosU, Khmer OS, Khmer OS Fasthand, Khmer OS Freehand, Khmer OS Metal Chrieng, Khmer OS Muol, Khmer OS System, Kidprint, Kochi Gothic, Kochi Mincho, Kozuka Mincho Pro Acro, LeedsUni, Leelawadee (few), Legendum, Linux Libertine OTF, Lucida Bright, Lucida Console, Lucida Grande, Lucida Sans, Lucida Sans Typewriter, Lucida Sans Unicode, Malgun Gothic, Marin, MD King KhammuRabi, MgOldTimes UC Pol, MgOpen Canonica, Microsoft Sans Serif, Ming(for ISO10646), MingLiU (few), MingLiU_HKSCS (few), Minion Pro, Mistral, Monospace, Monotype Corsiva, MPH 2B Damase, MS Gothic, MS Mincho, MS PGothic, MS PMincho, MS Reference Sans Serif, MS Reference Serif, MS UI Gothic, MSung Std Acro, MyMyanmar, Myriad Pro, New Athena Unicode, New Gulim, NSimSun (few), NSimSun-18030 (few), Nyala, PakType Naqsh, Palatino Linotype, ParabaikSans, PMingLiU (few), Reader Sans, Roman Unicode, Sanskrit 2003, Sazanami Mincho, Segoe Print, Segoe Script, Segoe UI, SImPL, SimSun (few), SimSun-18030 (few), Summersby, Sun-ExtA, Sylfaen, Tahoma, Thorndale, Thryomanes, Tibetan Machine Uni, Times New Roman, TITUS Cyberbit Basic, Trebuchet MS, TSC JSong S TT, Uqammaq (few), Uttara, UVN Gia Dinh, UVN Giay Trang, Verajja, Verdana, Vusillus Old Face, XTashi and Y.OzFontN; in the Macintosh OS 9 Unicode fonts Apple Chancery, Capitals, Charcoal, Charcoal CE, Chicago, Chicago CE, Courier, Courier CE, Gadget, Geneva, Geneva CE, Helvetica, Helvetica CE, Hoefler Text, Monaco, Monaco CE, New York, Palatino, Palatino CE, Sand, Skia, Tahoma, Techno, Textile, Times and Times CE; in the Macintosh OS X Unicode fonts Alkaios, Apple Gothic (Central European), Arial, Ayuthaya, Batang, Century, Chalkboard, Charcoal, Chicago, Conakry (few), Courier, Didot, Futura, Geneva, Gentium, GentiumAlt, #GothicMedium (Central European), Gulim, #GungSeo (Central European), Hangang (Central European), Helvetica, Hiragino Kaku Gothic Pro, Hiragino Kaku Gothic Std (few), Hiragino Maru Gothic Pro, Hiragino Mincho Pro, Junicode, Krungthep, Lucida Grande, Monaco, MS Gothic, MS Mincho, MS PGothic, MS PMincho, #MyungjoNeue (Central European), New Athena Unicode, New York, #PCMyungjo (Central European), #PilGi (Central European), Sand, Sathu, Seoul (Central European), Silom, Skia, SimSun (few), STFangsong, STHeiti, STKaiti, STSong, TektonPro, Thonburi, Times, Times New Roman, Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Zapfino and Zuzumbo (few); and in the Unix Unicode font Caslon.

To see exactly which characters are included in a particular font, you can use a utility such as Andrew West's BabelMap, Apple's TrueEdit, or WunderMoosen's FontChecker.

If you are not familiar with the characters, you can check the characters displayed here with the graphical display at http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0100.pdf (http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0100.pdf).

Character
(decimal)   Decimal   Character
(hex)   Hex   Name
?   256   ?   0100   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH MACRON
?   257   ?   0101   LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH MACRON
?   258   ?   0102   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH BREVE
?   259   ?   0103   LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH BREVE
?   260   ?   0104   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH OGONEK
?   261   ?   0105   LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH OGONEK
?   262   ?   0106   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH ACUTE
?   263   ?   0107   LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH ACUTE
?   264   ?   0108   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   265   ?   0109   LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   266   ?   010A   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH DOT ABOVE
?   267   ?   010B   LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH DOT ABOVE
?   268   ?   010C   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH CARON
?   269   ?   010D   LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CARON
?   270   ?   010E   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D WITH CARON
?   271   ?   010F   LATIN SMALL LETTER D WITH CARON
?   272   ?   0110   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D WITH STROKE
?   273   ?   0111   LATIN SMALL LETTER D WITH STROKE
?   274   ?   0112   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH MACRON
?   275   ?   0113   LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH MACRON
?   276   ?   0114   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE
?   277   ?   0115   LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE
?   278   ?   0116   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH DOT ABOVE
?   279   ?   0117   LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH DOT ABOVE
?   280   ?   0118   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH OGONEK
?   281   ?   0119   LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH OGONEK
?   282   ?   011A   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH CARON
?   283   ?   011B   LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH CARON
?   284   ?   011C   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   285   ?   011D   LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   286   ?   011E   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH BREVE
?   287   ?   011F   LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH BREVE
?   288   ?   0120   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH DOT ABOVE
?   289   ?   0121   LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH DOT ABOVE
?   290   ?   0122   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH CEDILLA
?   291   ?   0123   LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH CEDILLA
?   292   ?   0124   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   293   ?   0125   LATIN SMALL LETTER H WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   294   ?   0126   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H WITH STROKE
?   295   ?   0127   LATIN SMALL LETTER H WITH STROKE
?   296   ?   0128   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH TILDE
?   297   ?   0129   LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH TILDE
?   298   ?   012A   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH MACRON
?   299   ?   012B   LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH MACRON
?   300   ?   012C   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE
?   301   ?   012D   LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE
?   302   ?   012E   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH OGONEK
?   303   ?   012F   LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH OGONEK
?   304   ?   0130   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH DOT ABOVE
?   305   ?   0131   LATIN SMALL LETTER DOTLESS I
?   306   ?   0132   LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE IJ
?   307   ?   0133   LATIN SMALL LIGATURE IJ
?   308   ?   0134   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER J WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   309   ?   0135   LATIN SMALL LETTER J WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   310   ?   0136   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER K WITH CEDILLA
?   311   ?   0137   LATIN SMALL LETTER K WITH CEDILLA
?   312   ?   0138   LATIN SMALL LETTER KRA
?   313   ?   0139   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH ACUTE
?   314   ?   013A   LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH ACUTE
?   315   ?   013B   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH CEDILLA
?   316   ?   013C   LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH CEDILLA
?   317   ?   013D   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH CARON
?   318   ?   013E   LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH CARON
?   319   ?   013F   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH MIDDLE DOT
?   320   ?   0140   LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH MIDDLE DOT
?   321   ?   0141   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH STROKE
?   322   ?   0142   LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH STROKE
?   323   ?   0143   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH ACUTE
?   324   ?   0144   LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH ACUTE
?   325   ?   0145   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH CEDILLA
?   326   ?   0146   LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH CEDILLA
?   327   ?   0147   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH CARON
?   328   ?   0148   LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH CARON
?   329   ?   0149   LATIN SMALL LETTER N PRECEDED BY APOSTROPHE
?   330   ?   014A   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER ENG
?   331   ?   014B   LATIN SMALL LETTER ENG
?   332   ?   014C   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH MACRON
?   333   ?   014D   LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH MACRON
?   334   ?   014E   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE
?   335   ?   014F   LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE
?   336   ?   0150   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH DOUBLE ACUTE
?   337   ?   0151   LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH DOUBLE ACUTE
Œ   338   Œ   0152   LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE OE   (entity name is &OElig;)
œ   339   œ   0153   LATIN SMALL LIGATURE OE   (entity name is &oelig;)
?   340   ?   0154   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER R WITH ACUTE
?   341   ?   0155   LATIN SMALL LETTER R WITH ACUTE
?   342   ?   0156   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER R WITH CEDILLA
?   343   ?   0157   LATIN SMALL LETTER R WITH CEDILLA
?   344   ?   0158   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER R WITH CARON
?   345   ?   0159   LATIN SMALL LETTER R WITH CARON
?   346   ?   015A   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER S WITH ACUTE
?   347   ?   015B   LATIN SMALL LETTER S WITH ACUTE
?   348   ?   015C   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER S WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   349   ?   015D   LATIN SMALL LETTER S WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   350   ?   015E   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER S WITH CEDILLA
?   351   ?   015F   LATIN SMALL LETTER S WITH CEDILLA
Š   352   Š   0160   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER S WITH CARON   (entity name is &Scaron;)
š   353   š   0161   LATIN SMALL LETTER S WITH CARON   (entity name is &scaron;)
?   354   ?   0162   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER T WITH CEDILLA
?   355   ?   0163   LATIN SMALL LETTER T WITH CEDILLA
?   356   ?   0164   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER T WITH CARON
?   357   ?   0165   LATIN SMALL LETTER T WITH CARON
?   358   ?   0166   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER T WITH STROKE
?   359   ?   0167   LATIN SMALL LETTER T WITH STROKE
?   360   ?   0168   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH TILDE
?   361   ?   0169   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH TILDE
?   362   ?   016A   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH MACRON
?   363   ?   016B   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH MACRON
?   364   ?   016C   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH BREVE
?   365   ?   016D   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH BREVE
?   366   ?   016E   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH RING ABOVE
?   367   ?   016F   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH RING ABOVE
?   368   ?   0170   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH DOUBLE ACUTE
?   369   ?   0171   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH DOUBLE ACUTE
?   370   ?   0172   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH OGONEK
?   371   ?   0173   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH OGONEK
?   372   ?   0174   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   373   ?   0175   LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   374   ?   0176   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   375   ?   0177   LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH CIRCUMFLEX
Ÿ   376   Ÿ   0178   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH DIAERESIS   (entity name is &Yuml;)
?   377   ?   0179   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Z WITH ACUTE
?   378   ?   017A   LATIN SMALL LETTER Z WITH ACUTE
?   379   ?   017B   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Z WITH DOT ABOVE
?   380   ?   017C   LATIN SMALL LETTER Z WITH DOT ABOVE
Ž   381   Ž   017D   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Z WITH CARON
ž   382   ž   017E   LATIN SMALL LETTER Z WITH CARON
?   383   ?   017F   LATIN SMALL LETTER LONG S
      
Latin-1 Supplement       Latin Extended-B
Copyright © 1999–2008 Alan Wood

The hexadecimal numbers and the character names in the above table are taken from the Unicode 3.0 Character Database, Copyright © 1991–1999 Unicode, Inc., as contained in UnicodeData-Latest.txt on the Unicode ftp site (ftp://ftp.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/) in October 1999.

Created 3rd February 1999   Last updated 11th April 2008

Send comments or questions to Alan Wood

| Contents | Site Map | Unicode Fonts | Unicode Web Browsers | Unicode Programs |

Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 08:28 PM
sh
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: LordZeebmork on April 16, 2008 08:29 PM
Quote from: f0dsh
itty internet drama

Alan Wood's Unicode Resources

Test for Unicode support in Web browsers

Latin Extended-A

U+0100 – U+017F   (256–383)

      
Latin-1 Supplement       Latin Extended-B
These characters are used with Basic Latin. All of these characters are present in Microsoft's WGL4 character set. Characters 338, 339, 352, 353, 376, 381 and 382 provide Unicode equivalents for some of the characters in the ANSI character set. Characters 305, 338, 339 and 376 provide Unicode equivalents for four of the characters in Apple's MacRoman character set.

The characters that appear in the first column of the following table depend on the browser that you are using, the fonts installed on your computer, and the browser options you have chosen that determine the fonts used to display particular character sets, encodings or languages.

You can find some or all of the characters in this range in the Windows Unicode fonts Aboriginal Sans, Aboriginal Serif, AiPaiNutaaq (few), Akaash, Albany, Alkaios, ALPHABETUM Unicode, Andale Mono, Andale Sans, Andale Sans UI, Andron Scriptor Web, AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni, AR PL ZenKai Uni, Arabic Typesetting, Arev Sans, Arial, Arial Black, Arial Narrow, Arial Unicode MS, AttikaU, BabelStone Phags-pa Book, Baekmuk Batang, Baekmuk Dotum, Baekmuk Gulim, Baekmuk Headline, Ballymun RO, Batang, BatangChe, Berling Antiqua, Bitstream CyberBase, Bitstream CyberBit, Bitstream CyberCJK, Book Antiqua, Bookman Old Style, BosporosU, Calibri, Cambria, Cambria Math, Candara, Cardo, Caslon, Century, Century Gothic, Century Schoolbook, Chandas, Charis SIL, Chrysanthi Unicode, CN-Arial, CN-Times, Code2000, Comic Sans MS, Consolas, Constantia, Corbel, Courier MonoThai, Courier New, Cumberland, DejaVu Sans, DejaVu Sans Condensed, DejaVu Sans Mono, DejaVu Serif, DejaVu Serif Condensed, Dialekt Uni, Doulos SIL, Ekushey Azad, Ekushey Durga, Ekushey Puja, Ekushey Punarbhaba, Ekushey Saraswatii, Ekushey Sharifa, Ekushey Sumit, e-PhonTranslit UNI, ESL Gothic Unicode, Everson Mono Unicode, Fixedsys Excelsior, FMBF Bardi, Franklin Gothic, Franklin Gothic Cond, Free Monospaced, Free Sans, Free Serif, Frutiger Linotype, Gandhari Unicode, Garamond, Garava, Gentium, GentiumAlt, Georgia, GFS Bodoni, GFS Didot, GFS Neohellenic, Gisha (few), Gulim Che, Gungsuh, GungsuhChe, Haettenschweiler, HAN NOM A, HAN NOM B, Hapax Berbère (few), Hapax Touareg (few), Hapax Touareg DàG (few), Hindsight Unicode, HY Shin Myeongjo Std Acro, Impact, Iskoola Pota (few), jGaramond, Jomolhari, Junicode, KadmosU, Khmer OS, Khmer OS Fasthand, Khmer OS Freehand, Khmer OS Metal Chrieng, Khmer OS Muol, Khmer OS System, Kidprint, Kochi Gothic, Kochi Mincho, Kozuka Mincho Pro Acro, LeedsUni, Leelawadee (few), Legendum, Linux Libertine OTF, Lucida Bright, Lucida Console, Lucida Grande, Lucida Sans, Lucida Sans Typewriter, Lucida Sans Unicode, Malgun Gothic, Marin, MD King KhammuRabi, MgOldTimes UC Pol, MgOpen Canonica, Microsoft Sans Serif, Ming(for ISO10646), MingLiU (few), MingLiU_HKSCS (few), Minion Pro, Mistral, Monospace, Monotype Corsiva, MPH 2B Damase, MS Gothic, MS Mincho, MS PGothic, MS PMincho, MS Reference Sans Serif, MS Reference Serif, MS UI Gothic, MSung Std Acro, MyMyanmar, Myriad Pro, New Athena Unicode, New Gulim, NSimSun (few), NSimSun-18030 (few), Nyala, PakType Naqsh, Palatino Linotype, ParabaikSans, PMingLiU (few), Reader Sans, Roman Unicode, Sanskrit 2003, Sazanami Mincho, Segoe Print, Segoe Script, Segoe UI, SImPL, SimSun (few), SimSun-18030 (few), Summersby, Sun-ExtA, Sylfaen, Tahoma, Thorndale, Thryomanes, Tibetan Machine Uni, Times New Roman, TITUS Cyberbit Basic, Trebuchet MS, TSC JSong S TT, Uqammaq (few), Uttara, UVN Gia Dinh, UVN Giay Trang, Verajja, Verdana, Vusillus Old Face, XTashi and Y.OzFontN; in the Macintosh OS 9 Unicode fonts Apple Chancery, Capitals, Charcoal, Charcoal CE, Chicago, Chicago CE, Courier, Courier CE, Gadget, Geneva, Geneva CE, Helvetica, Helvetica CE, Hoefler Text, Monaco, Monaco CE, New York, Palatino, Palatino CE, Sand, Skia, Tahoma, Techno, Textile, Times and Times CE; in the Macintosh OS X Unicode fonts Alkaios, Apple Gothic (Central European), Arial, Ayuthaya, Batang, Century, Chalkboard, Charcoal, Chicago, Conakry (few), Courier, Didot, Futura, Geneva, Gentium, GentiumAlt, #GothicMedium (Central European), Gulim, #GungSeo (Central European), Hangang (Central European), Helvetica, Hiragino Kaku Gothic Pro, Hiragino Kaku Gothic Std (few), Hiragino Maru Gothic Pro, Hiragino Mincho Pro, Junicode, Krungthep, Lucida Grande, Monaco, MS Gothic, MS Mincho, MS PGothic, MS PMincho, #MyungjoNeue (Central European), New Athena Unicode, New York, #PCMyungjo (Central European), #PilGi (Central European), Sand, Sathu, Seoul (Central European), Silom, Skia, SimSun (few), STFangsong, STHeiti, STKaiti, STSong, TektonPro, Thonburi, Times, Times New Roman, Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Zapfino and Zuzumbo (few); and in the Unix Unicode font Caslon.

To see exactly which characters are included in a particular font, you can use a utility such as Andrew West's BabelMap, Apple's TrueEdit, or WunderMoosen's FontChecker.

If you are not familiar with the characters, you can check the characters displayed here with the graphical display at http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0100.pdf (http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0100.pdf).

Character
(decimal)   Decimal   Character
(hex)   Hex   Name
?   256   ?   0100   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH MACRON
?   257   ?   0101   LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH MACRON
?   258   ?   0102   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH BREVE
?   259   ?   0103   LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH BREVE
?   260   ?   0104   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH OGONEK
?   261   ?   0105   LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH OGONEK
?   262   ?   0106   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH ACUTE
?   263   ?   0107   LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH ACUTE
?   264   ?   0108   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   265   ?   0109   LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   266   ?   010A   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH DOT ABOVE
?   267   ?   010B   LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH DOT ABOVE
?   268   ?   010C   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH CARON
?   269   ?   010D   LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CARON
?   270   ?   010E   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D WITH CARON
?   271   ?   010F   LATIN SMALL LETTER D WITH CARON
?   272   ?   0110   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D WITH STROKE
?   273   ?   0111   LATIN SMALL LETTER D WITH STROKE
?   274   ?   0112   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH MACRON
?   275   ?   0113   LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH MACRON
?   276   ?   0114   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE
?   277   ?   0115   LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE
?   278   ?   0116   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH DOT ABOVE
?   279   ?   0117   LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH DOT ABOVE
?   280   ?   0118   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH OGONEK
?   281   ?   0119   LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH OGONEK
?   282   ?   011A   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH CARON
?   283   ?   011B   LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH CARON
?   284   ?   011C   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   285   ?   011D   LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   286   ?   011E   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH BREVE
?   287   ?   011F   LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH BREVE
?   288   ?   0120   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH DOT ABOVE
?   289   ?   0121   LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH DOT ABOVE
?   290   ?   0122   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH CEDILLA
?   291   ?   0123   LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH CEDILLA
?   292   ?   0124   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   293   ?   0125   LATIN SMALL LETTER H WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   294   ?   0126   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H WITH STROKE
?   295   ?   0127   LATIN SMALL LETTER H WITH STROKE
?   296   ?   0128   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH TILDE
?   297   ?   0129   LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH TILDE
?   298   ?   012A   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH MACRON
?   299   ?   012B   LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH MACRON
?   300   ?   012C   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE
?   301   ?   012D   LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE
?   302   ?   012E   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH OGONEK
?   303   ?   012F   LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH OGONEK
?   304   ?   0130   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH DOT ABOVE
?   305   ?   0131   LATIN SMALL LETTER DOTLESS I
?   306   ?   0132   LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE IJ
?   307   ?   0133   LATIN SMALL LIGATURE IJ
?   308   ?   0134   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER J WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   309   ?   0135   LATIN SMALL LETTER J WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   310   ?   0136   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER K WITH CEDILLA
?   311   ?   0137   LATIN SMALL LETTER K WITH CEDILLA
?   312   ?   0138   LATIN SMALL LETTER KRA
?   313   ?   0139   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH ACUTE
?   314   ?   013A   LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH ACUTE
?   315   ?   013B   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH CEDILLA
?   316   ?   013C   LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH CEDILLA
?   317   ?   013D   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH CARON
?   318   ?   013E   LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH CARON
?   319   ?   013F   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH MIDDLE DOT
?   320   ?   0140   LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH MIDDLE DOT
?   321   ?   0141   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH STROKE
?   322   ?   0142   LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH STROKE
?   323   ?   0143   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH ACUTE
?   324   ?   0144   LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH ACUTE
?   325   ?   0145   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH CEDILLA
?   326   ?   0146   LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH CEDILLA
?   327   ?   0147   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH CARON
?   328   ?   0148   LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH CARON
?   329   ?   0149   LATIN SMALL LETTER N PRECEDED BY APOSTROPHE
?   330   ?   014A   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER ENG
?   331   ?   014B   LATIN SMALL LETTER ENG
?   332   ?   014C   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH MACRON
?   333   ?   014D   LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH MACRON
?   334   ?   014E   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE
?   335   ?   014F   LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE
?   336   ?   0150   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH DOUBLE ACUTE
?   337   ?   0151   LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH DOUBLE ACUTE
Œ   338   Œ   0152   LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE OE   (entity name is &OElig;)
œ   339   œ   0153   LATIN SMALL LIGATURE OE   (entity name is &oelig;)
?   340   ?   0154   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER R WITH ACUTE
?   341   ?   0155   LATIN SMALL LETTER R WITH ACUTE
?   342   ?   0156   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER R WITH CEDILLA
?   343   ?   0157   LATIN SMALL LETTER R WITH CEDILLA
?   344   ?   0158   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER R WITH CARON
?   345   ?   0159   LATIN SMALL LETTER R WITH CARON
?   346   ?   015A   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER S WITH ACUTE
?   347   ?   015B   LATIN SMALL LETTER S WITH ACUTE
?   348   ?   015C   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER S WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   349   ?   015D   LATIN SMALL LETTER S WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   350   ?   015E   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER S WITH CEDILLA
?   351   ?   015F   LATIN SMALL LETTER S WITH CEDILLA
Š   352   Š   0160   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER S WITH CARON   (entity name is &Scaron;)
š   353   š   0161   LATIN SMALL LETTER S WITH CARON   (entity name is &scaron;)
?   354   ?   0162   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER T WITH CEDILLA
?   355   ?   0163   LATIN SMALL LETTER T WITH CEDILLA
?   356   ?   0164   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER T WITH CARON
?   357   ?   0165   LATIN SMALL LETTER T WITH CARON
?   358   ?   0166   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER T WITH STROKE
?   359   ?   0167   LATIN SMALL LETTER T WITH STROKE
?   360   ?   0168   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH TILDE
?   361   ?   0169   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH TILDE
?   362   ?   016A   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH MACRON
?   363   ?   016B   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH MACRON
?   364   ?   016C   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH BREVE
?   365   ?   016D   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH BREVE
?   366   ?   016E   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH RING ABOVE
?   367   ?   016F   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH RING ABOVE
?   368   ?   0170   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH DOUBLE ACUTE
?   369   ?   0171   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH DOUBLE ACUTE
?   370   ?   0172   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH OGONEK
?   371   ?   0173   LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH OGONEK
?   372   ?   0174   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   373   ?   0175   LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   374   ?   0176   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH CIRCUMFLEX
?   375   ?   0177   LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH CIRCUMFLEX
Ÿ   376   Ÿ   0178   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH DIAERESIS   (entity name is &Yuml;)
?   377   ?   0179   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Z WITH ACUTE
?   378   ?   017A   LATIN SMALL LETTER Z WITH ACUTE
?   379   ?   017B   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Z WITH DOT ABOVE
?   380   ?   017C   LATIN SMALL LETTER Z WITH DOT ABOVE
Ž   381   Ž   017D   LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Z WITH CARON
ž   382   ž   017E   LATIN SMALL LETTER Z WITH CARON
?   383   ?   017F   LATIN SMALL LETTER LONG S
      
Latin-1 Supplement       Latin Extended-B
Copyright © 1999–2008 Alan Wood

The hexadecimal numbers and the character names in the above table are taken from the Unicode 3.0 Character Database, Copyright © 1991–1999 Unicode, Inc., as contained in UnicodeData-Latest.txt on the Unicode ftp site (ftp://ftp.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/) in October 1999.

Created 3rd February 1999   Last updated 11th April 2008

Send comments or questions to Alan Wood

| Contents | Site Map | Unicode Fonts | Unicode Web Browsers | Unicode Programs |

Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 08:30 PM
[attachment=1378:littlepeoplenm2.jpg]
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 08:32 PM
the drama ended like 10 pages ago and everyone has been acting like its still goin on and postin all this damn shit lmao jeez
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: billy on April 16, 2008 08:33 PM
say yer prayers

COUNTDOWN:



















































10
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 08:33 PM
Quote from: f0dthe drama ended like 10 pages ago and everyone has been acting like its still goin on and postin all this damn shit lmao jeez
SHUT UP YOU NIGGRHATER
KICKIN DA EQUALITY
UP IN DA SKY
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: f0d on April 16, 2008 08:33 PM
9
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 08:34 PM
87
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: billy on April 16, 2008 08:34 PM
6
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 08:35 PM
12
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: SHADOWFOX2 on April 16, 2008 08:35 PM
Well, FreekC leads as the longest topic so far...
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 08:37 PM
ok just destroy this thread already
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: billy on April 16, 2008 08:37 PM
CONTINUE THE COUNTDOWN

5
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: MindChamber on April 16, 2008 08:38 PM
Quoteyeah well NG appreciates but it still needs work bro. you could A) work on getting better, or B. spam the portal and call everyone that votes low on your stuff morons and assholes.
people dont seem to realize this about the SS. when we were spamming the portal, we were actually working on getting better at the same time. killing two birds with one stone. i got better at animating from making dailytoons than i did taking 4 years of traditional animation classes, 2 advanced flash classes, and 3 ucla animation workshop classes. no lie.

dude you'll get there,  also  doing SS gags still fills that need of assurance and confidence that those who make videogame parodies get. sure it may feel like a cheap way to get alil confidence but if you like the material  and that material happens to be popular, then so what,
you are still learning and growing and you will eventually tire of it and search for new inspiration.
its how all artist grow.

I'll be looking forward to seeing part 2
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 08:39 PM
STOP FLAMING FOOD YOU JACKASS
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 16, 2008 08:42 PM








43
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: billy on April 16, 2008 08:42 PM
2
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: wps on April 16, 2008 08:43 PM
1
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: zomfgbie on April 16, 2008 08:43 PM
haha man these reviews are hilarious im so glad i made this topic
Title: stupid reviews part 2
Post by: rtil on April 16, 2008 08:44 PM
[size=]ZERO[/size]