Hey everyone I'm Aidan!
I'm a 14 year old male who love to play guitar, animate and I'm learning to code. I have nothing to show for my animation skills, because i can never finish anything, and I'm terrible at drawing. I also have never done any recording with guitar.
Anyway, i hope to become friends with many of you.
Hello ^^
Welcome aboard!
Don't drink the water.
Quote from: Sheepy on October 29, 2012 07:55 PM
Welcome aboard!
Don't drink the water.
Thank you capin!
hello. welcome. good day
try not to die.
hello and welcome
i hope you like tea
Quote from: Shida on October 29, 2012 08:04 PM
hello and welcome
i hope you like tea
I do enjoy tea.
Excellent. This is a grand start.
Quote from: Shida on October 29, 2012 08:07 PM
Excellent. This is a grand start.
Grand starts start with grandness.
welcome
i like the cut of your jib.
welcome, sir.
another shrimp on the barby, welcome to tba!
"hi im gay"
"hello me too"
summary of thread
needs some meat on its bones
My duty to you, dear reader, constrains me to the disagreeable and almost painful task of giving you a significant amount of information that you may be unwilling to accept. Before I begin talking about specifics, let me just mention that Aidan's convinced that people everywhere have a deeply held love of pessimism. I avouch that if he held a rally in support of pessimism, no more than two people would show up—one if you exclude the local street vendor who just happens to be peddling his wares in the vicinity. The reason, obviously, is that if Aidan continues to create a regime of inimical solecism, I will be obliged to do something about him. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations.
There is a proper place in life for hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool. But when Aidan perverts hatred in order to vandalize our neighborhoods, it becomes clear that he has been trying to convince us that we can stop nihilism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for vainglorious, licentious clunks. This pathetic attempt to gag free speech deserves no comment other than to say that Aidan used to be a major proponent of tuchungism. Nowadays, he's putting all of his support behind onanism. As they say, plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Aidan's patter is smooth and quite practiced. He can fast-talk you into believing you'd be better off if you participated in his effort to fleece people out of their life's savings. However, his lamentations fall apart upon reflection.
Yes, Aidan may be nothing more than a disposable tool of power-wielding, unsophisticated pests, but we need to name and shame his stooges for their litigious acts of ageism. Why? Because of what's at stake: literally everything. It's not that there's anything wrong with declaring a truce with him and commencing a dialogue—there isn't—but it's important to realize that he's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is Aidan's gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to trivialize certain events that are particularly special to us all. I just want to say that aside from a few exceptions, this statement is unmistakably valid. And that's why I'm writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to urge lawmakers to pass a nonbinding resolution affirming that innocent children have been brainwashed by his crabby, malignant rejoinders. There's no way I can do that alone, and there's no way I can do it without first stating that I am making a pretty serious accusation here. I am accusing him of planning to detach people from their morally established systems of belief. And I don't want anyone to think that I am basing my accusation only on the fact that if we're not careful, his disloyal hastily mounted campaigns will throw us into a third world war in a matter of days.
The costs of Aidan's prevarications outweigh their benefits, and I'm not making that up! I disapprove of allotheism and I disapprove of Aidan's mawkish machinations. Now I could go off on that point alone, but I never used to be particularly concerned about his hatchet jobs. Any damned fool, or so I thought, could see that I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind Aidan that I recently informed him that his worshippers disarm us morally, make us rootless and defenseless, and then destroy us. Aidan said he'd "look further into the matter"—well, not too much further. After all, he would have us shower jealous, disruptive twerps with undeserved encomia. May God, in his restraining mercy, forbid that we should ever do this most footling and randy thing!
Come to think of it, where did Aidan learn how to empty garbage pails full of the vilest slanders and defamations on the clean garments of honorable people? At the intersection of Mercantalism Avenue and Revanchism Lane? My point is that Aidan's undertakings are not an abstract problem. They have very concrete, immediate, and unpleasant consequences. For instance, Aidan's current aspiration is to add insult to injury. I'd call that the most insane idea in Aidan's long history of insane ideas. It's the sort of idea that draws attention to how my position is that he is completely unmovable by truth or reason. Aidan, in contrast, argues that the average working-class person can't see through his chicanery. This disagreement merely scratches the surface of the ideological chasm festering between me and Aidan. The only rational way to bridge this chasm is for him to admit that he has been known to propound ideas that are widely perceived as representing outright interdenominationalism. That always spurs on his tuft-hunters to break the mind and spirit, castrate the character, and kill the career of anyone whose ideas he deems to be uppity. That, in turn, encourages Aidan to make people suspicious of those who speak the truth. This cycle inevitably, inexorably ratchets upwards and outwards until at last some indecent doryphore winds up molding the mind of virtually every citizen—young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated.
I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that Aidan blames others for his discourteous deeds, and the second is that I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this: He claims that diseases can be defeated not through standard medical research but through the creation of a new language, one that does not stigmatize certain groups and behaviors. Predictably, he cites no hard data for that claim. This is because no such data exist.
Aidan claims that everyone who scrambles aboard the Aidan bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride. Sound suspicious? Morbid is a better word. He deceptively claims that he's listening to our suggestions. The reality, however, is that Aidan is thumbing the scales towards his own ill-tempered catch-phrases even though he knows that several things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how the cure for evil is more evil.
Of course, in a discussion of this type, one should decidedly mention that Aidan's method (or school, or ideology—it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of "Aidan-ism". It is a furciferous and avowedly self-deluded philosophy that aims to reduce our modern, civilized, industrialized society to a state of mindless, primitive barbarism. Contrary to the impression that hypersensitive liars and cheats offer "new," "innovative," and "advanced" ideas, there is little new in their credos. He has done inestimable damage to everything around him. More than that, he wants to set the wolf to mind the sheep. That's indeed a formula for repression and resentment and will lead to him taking us over the edge of the abyss of militarism eventually.
There are two reasons that induce me to submit Aidan's treatises to a special examination: 1) Aidan's suggestions are a quick-fix detour, a placebo aimed at surface symptoms, and an excuse to defy the law of the land, and 2) Aidan's pretense of soliciting input from others amounts to little more than a giant suggestion box, inside of which lies a forever-churning paper shredder. I must admit that the second point in particular sometimes fills me with anxious concern. My dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to speak out against contemptuous, lewd heinsbies. How dare Aidan regiment the public mind as much as an army regiments the bodies of its soldiers! We must work together to straighten out our thinking and change the path we're on. What can you do to help? For starters, you might want to take up the mantle and solve our problems over a negotiating table instead of resorting to the battlefield. I personally derive great satisfaction in doing that sort of thing because the implications of this are obvious. To spell it out, though, if today we don't prevent Aidan's obstinate opinions from spreading like a malignant tumor, then tomorrow we'll have to put up with Aidan creating a world without history, without philosophy, without science, without reason—a world without beauty of any kind, without art, without literature, without culture.
If it weren't for Aidan's double standards he would have no standards at all. Hence, it's utterly a waste of time even to address Aidan's hypocrisy. That's why I'll state merely that "Aidan" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone overthrowing all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead dragging people down into the sphere of Aidan's own base nature, I tell him or her to stop "Aidan-ing". A large percentage of his forces can be termed lascivious. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that we must lead Aidan out of a dream world and back to hard reality. If we fail then all of our sacrifices and all of the dreams and sacrifices of our ancestors will have been in vain. The key is to realize that I recently stated that Bulverism is both a belief system and a material, institutional reality. I had considered my comment to be fairly anodyne, but Aidan went into quite a swivet over it. I guess if he found that sort of comment offensive, he should undoubtedly cover his ears when I state that I've long thought it would be fun to try to explain to him how if we let him divert our attention from serious issues, civilization itself will fall. For the most part, I'm just curious as to how deep Aidan will have to dig into his profanity thesaurus to formulate a response. In short, Aidan's unedifying preoccupation with radicalism will make miserabilism socially acceptable sooner or later.
Quote from: Sinitron on November 1, 2012 03:39 AM
"hi im gay"
"hello me too"
summary of thread
needs some meat on its bones
My duty to you, dear reader, constrains me to the disagreeable and almost painful task of giving you a significant amount of information that you may be unwilling to accept. Before I begin talking about specifics, let me just mention that Aidan's convinced that people everywhere have a deeply held love of pessimism. I avouch that if he held a rally in support of pessimism, no more than two people would show up—one if you exclude the local street vendor who just happens to be peddling his wares in the vicinity. The reason, obviously, is that if Aidan continues to create a regime of inimical solecism, I will be obliged to do something about him. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations.
There is a proper place in life for hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool. But when Aidan perverts hatred in order to vandalize our neighborhoods, it becomes clear that he has been trying to convince us that we can stop nihilism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for vainglorious, licentious clunks. This pathetic attempt to gag free speech deserves no comment other than to say that Aidan used to be a major proponent of tuchungism. Nowadays, he's putting all of his support behind onanism. As they say, plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Aidan's patter is smooth and quite practiced. He can fast-talk you into believing you'd be better off if you participated in his effort to fleece people out of their life's savings. However, his lamentations fall apart upon reflection.
Yes, Aidan may be nothing more than a disposable tool of power-wielding, unsophisticated pests, but we need to name and shame his stooges for their litigious acts of ageism. Why? Because of what's at stake: literally everything. It's not that there's anything wrong with declaring a truce with him and commencing a dialogue—there isn't—but it's important to realize that he's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is Aidan's gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to trivialize certain events that are particularly special to us all. I just want to say that aside from a few exceptions, this statement is unmistakably valid. And that's why I'm writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to urge lawmakers to pass a nonbinding resolution affirming that innocent children have been brainwashed by his crabby, malignant rejoinders. There's no way I can do that alone, and there's no way I can do it without first stating that I am making a pretty serious accusation here. I am accusing him of planning to detach people from their morally established systems of belief. And I don't want anyone to think that I am basing my accusation only on the fact that if we're not careful, his disloyal hastily mounted campaigns will throw us into a third world war in a matter of days.
The costs of Aidan's prevarications outweigh their benefits, and I'm not making that up! I disapprove of allotheism and I disapprove of Aidan's mawkish machinations. Now I could go off on that point alone, but I never used to be particularly concerned about his hatchet jobs. Any damned fool, or so I thought, could see that I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind Aidan that I recently informed him that his worshippers disarm us morally, make us rootless and defenseless, and then destroy us. Aidan said he'd "look further into the matter"—well, not too much further. After all, he would have us shower jealous, disruptive twerps with undeserved encomia. May God, in his restraining mercy, forbid that we should ever do this most footling and randy thing!
Come to think of it, where did Aidan learn how to empty garbage pails full of the vilest slanders and defamations on the clean garments of honorable people? At the intersection of Mercantalism Avenue and Revanchism Lane? My point is that Aidan's undertakings are not an abstract problem. They have very concrete, immediate, and unpleasant consequences. For instance, Aidan's current aspiration is to add insult to injury. I'd call that the most insane idea in Aidan's long history of insane ideas. It's the sort of idea that draws attention to how my position is that he is completely unmovable by truth or reason. Aidan, in contrast, argues that the average working-class person can't see through his chicanery. This disagreement merely scratches the surface of the ideological chasm festering between me and Aidan. The only rational way to bridge this chasm is for him to admit that he has been known to propound ideas that are widely perceived as representing outright interdenominationalism. That always spurs on his tuft-hunters to break the mind and spirit, castrate the character, and kill the career of anyone whose ideas he deems to be uppity. That, in turn, encourages Aidan to make people suspicious of those who speak the truth. This cycle inevitably, inexorably ratchets upwards and outwards until at last some indecent doryphore winds up molding the mind of virtually every citizen—young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated.
I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that Aidan blames others for his discourteous deeds, and the second is that I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this: He claims that diseases can be defeated not through standard medical research but through the creation of a new language, one that does not stigmatize certain groups and behaviors. Predictably, he cites no hard data for that claim. This is because no such data exist.
Aidan claims that everyone who scrambles aboard the Aidan bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride. Sound suspicious? Morbid is a better word. He deceptively claims that he's listening to our suggestions. The reality, however, is that Aidan is thumbing the scales towards his own ill-tempered catch-phrases even though he knows that several things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how the cure for evil is more evil.
Of course, in a discussion of this type, one should decidedly mention that Aidan's method (or school, or ideology—it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of "Aidan-ism". It is a furciferous and avowedly self-deluded philosophy that aims to reduce our modern, civilized, industrialized society to a state of mindless, primitive barbarism. Contrary to the impression that hypersensitive liars and cheats offer "new," "innovative," and "advanced" ideas, there is little new in their credos. He has done inestimable damage to everything around him. More than that, he wants to set the wolf to mind the sheep. That's indeed a formula for repression and resentment and will lead to him taking us over the edge of the abyss of militarism eventually.
There are two reasons that induce me to submit Aidan's treatises to a special examination: 1) Aidan's suggestions are a quick-fix detour, a placebo aimed at surface symptoms, and an excuse to defy the law of the land, and 2) Aidan's pretense of soliciting input from others amounts to little more than a giant suggestion box, inside of which lies a forever-churning paper shredder. I must admit that the second point in particular sometimes fills me with anxious concern. My dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to speak out against contemptuous, lewd heinsbies. How dare Aidan regiment the public mind as much as an army regiments the bodies of its soldiers! We must work together to straighten out our thinking and change the path we're on. What can you do to help? For starters, you might want to take up the mantle and solve our problems over a negotiating table instead of resorting to the battlefield. I personally derive great satisfaction in doing that sort of thing because the implications of this are obvious. To spell it out, though, if today we don't prevent Aidan's obstinate opinions from spreading like a malignant tumor, then tomorrow we'll have to put up with Aidan creating a world without history, without philosophy, without science, without reason—a world without beauty of any kind, without art, without literature, without culture.
If it weren't for Aidan's double standards he would have no standards at all. Hence, it's utterly a waste of time even to address Aidan's hypocrisy. That's why I'll state merely that "Aidan" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone overthrowing all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead dragging people down into the sphere of Aidan's own base nature, I tell him or her to stop "Aidan-ing". A large percentage of his forces can be termed lascivious. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that we must lead Aidan out of a dream world and back to hard reality. If we fail then all of our sacrifices and all of the dreams and sacrifices of our ancestors will have been in vain. The key is to realize that I recently stated that Bulverism is both a belief system and a material, institutional reality. I had considered my comment to be fairly anodyne, but Aidan went into quite a swivet over it. I guess if he found that sort of comment offensive, he should undoubtedly cover his ears when I state that I've long thought it would be fun to try to explain to him how if we let him divert our attention from serious issues, civilization itself will fall. For the most part, I'm just curious as to how deep Aidan will have to dig into his profanity thesaurus to formulate a response. In short, Aidan's unedifying preoccupation with radicalism will make miserabilism socially acceptable sooner or later.
Wut
what he said
mad libs: forum copypaste edition
One day, we'll understand.
One day.
NOOBLORD
Quote from: Sinitron on November 1, 2012 03:39 AM
"hi im gay"
"hello me too"
summary of thread
needs some meat on its bones
My duty to you, dear reader, constrains me to the disagreeable and almost painful task of giving you a significant amount of information that you may be unwilling to accept. Before I begin talking about specifics, let me just mention that Aidan's convinced that people everywhere have a deeply held love of pessimism. I avouch that if he held a rally in support of pessimism, no more than two people would show up—one if you exclude the local street vendor who just happens to be peddling his wares in the vicinity. The reason, obviously, is that if Aidan continues to create a regime of inimical solecism, I will be obliged to do something about him. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations.
There is a proper place in life for hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool. But when Aidan perverts hatred in order to vandalize our neighborhoods, it becomes clear that he has been trying to convince us that we can stop nihilism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for vainglorious, licentious clunks. This pathetic attempt to gag free speech deserves no comment other than to say that Aidan used to be a major proponent of tuchungism. Nowadays, he's putting all of his support behind onanism. As they say, plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Aidan's patter is smooth and quite practiced. He can fast-talk you into believing you'd be better off if you participated in his effort to fleece people out of their life's savings. However, his lamentations fall apart upon reflection.
Yes, Aidan may be nothing more than a disposable tool of power-wielding, unsophisticated pests, but we need to name and shame his stooges for their litigious acts of ageism. Why? Because of what's at stake: literally everything. It's not that there's anything wrong with declaring a truce with him and commencing a dialogue—there isn't—but it's important to realize that he's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is Aidan's gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to trivialize certain events that are particularly special to us all. I just want to say that aside from a few exceptions, this statement is unmistakably valid. And that's why I'm writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to urge lawmakers to pass a nonbinding resolution affirming that innocent children have been brainwashed by his crabby, malignant rejoinders. There's no way I can do that alone, and there's no way I can do it without first stating that I am making a pretty serious accusation here. I am accusing him of planning to detach people from their morally established systems of belief. And I don't want anyone to think that I am basing my accusation only on the fact that if we're not careful, his disloyal hastily mounted campaigns will throw us into a third world war in a matter of days.
The costs of Aidan's prevarications outweigh their benefits, and I'm not making that up! I disapprove of allotheism and I disapprove of Aidan's mawkish machinations. Now I could go off on that point alone, but I never used to be particularly concerned about his hatchet jobs. Any damned fool, or so I thought, could see that I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind Aidan that I recently informed him that his worshippers disarm us morally, make us rootless and defenseless, and then destroy us. Aidan said he'd "look further into the matter"—well, not too much further. After all, he would have us shower jealous, disruptive twerps with undeserved encomia. May God, in his restraining mercy, forbid that we should ever do this most footling and randy thing!
Come to think of it, where did Aidan learn how to empty garbage pails full of the vilest slanders and defamations on the clean garments of honorable people? At the intersection of Mercantalism Avenue and Revanchism Lane? My point is that Aidan's undertakings are not an abstract problem. They have very concrete, immediate, and unpleasant consequences. For instance, Aidan's current aspiration is to add insult to injury. I'd call that the most insane idea in Aidan's long history of insane ideas. It's the sort of idea that draws attention to how my position is that he is completely unmovable by truth or reason. Aidan, in contrast, argues that the average working-class person can't see through his chicanery. This disagreement merely scratches the surface of the ideological chasm festering between me and Aidan. The only rational way to bridge this chasm is for him to admit that he has been known to propound ideas that are widely perceived as representing outright interdenominationalism. That always spurs on his tuft-hunters to break the mind and spirit, castrate the character, and kill the career of anyone whose ideas he deems to be uppity. That, in turn, encourages Aidan to make people suspicious of those who speak the truth. This cycle inevitably, inexorably ratchets upwards and outwards until at last some indecent doryphore winds up molding the mind of virtually every citizen—young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated.
I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that Aidan blames others for his discourteous deeds, and the second is that I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this: He claims that diseases can be defeated not through standard medical research but through the creation of a new language, one that does not stigmatize certain groups and behaviors. Predictably, he cites no hard data for that claim. This is because no such data exist.
Aidan claims that everyone who scrambles aboard the Aidan bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride. Sound suspicious? Morbid is a better word. He deceptively claims that he's listening to our suggestions. The reality, however, is that Aidan is thumbing the scales towards his own ill-tempered catch-phrases even though he knows that several things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how the cure for evil is more evil.
Of course, in a discussion of this type, one should decidedly mention that Aidan's method (or school, or ideology—it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of "Aidan-ism". It is a furciferous and avowedly self-deluded philosophy that aims to reduce our modern, civilized, industrialized society to a state of mindless, primitive barbarism. Contrary to the impression that hypersensitive liars and cheats offer "new," "innovative," and "advanced" ideas, there is little new in their credos. He has done inestimable damage to everything around him. More than that, he wants to set the wolf to mind the sheep. That's indeed a formula for repression and resentment and will lead to him taking us over the edge of the abyss of militarism eventually.
There are two reasons that induce me to submit Aidan's treatises to a special examination: 1) Aidan's suggestions are a quick-fix detour, a placebo aimed at surface symptoms, and an excuse to defy the law of the land, and 2) Aidan's pretense of soliciting input from others amounts to little more than a giant suggestion box, inside of which lies a forever-churning paper shredder. I must admit that the second point in particular sometimes fills me with anxious concern. My dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to speak out against contemptuous, lewd heinsbies. How dare Aidan regiment the public mind as much as an army regiments the bodies of its soldiers! We must work together to straighten out our thinking and change the path we're on. What can you do to help? For starters, you might want to take up the mantle and solve our problems over a negotiating table instead of resorting to the battlefield. I personally derive great satisfaction in doing that sort of thing because the implications of this are obvious. To spell it out, though, if today we don't prevent Aidan's obstinate opinions from spreading like a malignant tumor, then tomorrow we'll have to put up with Aidan creating a world without history, without philosophy, without science, without reason—a world without beauty of any kind, without art, without literature, without culture.
If it weren't for Aidan's double standards he would have no standards at all. Hence, it's utterly a waste of time even to address Aidan's hypocrisy. That's why I'll state merely that "Aidan" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone overthrowing all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead dragging people down into the sphere of Aidan's own base nature, I tell him or her to stop "Aidan-ing". A large percentage of his forces can be termed lascivious. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that we must lead Aidan out of a dream world and back to hard reality. If we fail then all of our sacrifices and all of the dreams and sacrifices of our ancestors will have been in vain. The key is to realize that I recently stated that Bulverism is both a belief system and a material, institutional reality. I had considered my comment to be fairly anodyne, but Aidan went into quite a swivet over it. I guess if he found that sort of comment offensive, he should undoubtedly cover his ears when I state that I've long thought it would be fun to try to explain to him how if we let him divert our attention from serious issues, civilization itself will fall. For the most part, I'm just curious as to how deep Aidan will have to dig into his profanity thesaurus to formulate a response. In short, Aidan's unedifying preoccupation with radicalism will make miserabilism socially acceptable sooner or later.
Wow thanks!
No one has ever written me a book before!
and they never will, either
Quote from: Sinitron on November 4, 2012 08:28 AM
and they never will, either
(https://thebackalleys.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reactiongifs.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F01%2FI_has_a_sad.gif&hash=de1d0a39c5aa3762c74b5855aae217d1c51efcf8)
^
hi