contests poll

Started by rtil, February 28, 2009 09:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rtil

so here it is folks
and as far as contest moderator(s) go, we'll figure that out later if necessary

Flash

yes
bi-weekly
contest moderators

funzop

i am a good contest moderator

jjjjjjjjjj

There needs to be more than one judge, and someone non bias toward a person.
If people vote, say hammi enters and no one votes for him because they dont like him or something, then it's just a popularity contest.
I'd say there needs to be like, 3 judges maybe or someone who doesnt hate another member who enters that wouldn't be right ye.

funzop

i love everyone hint hint

jjjjjjjjjj

hey i like everyone too, really but i think thats up to rtil to decide yknow.

99

I agree with J_Seed, thejudges need to be non-biased.  I think you and some mods should think who would be good judges for specific contests.  3 sounds like a good number.  We need to make sure to weed out people who are just judging so they can dick around.

Ying

wow

it's unanimous on everything except who votes. i think the contest moderator is still a good idea, they usually picked out the true winners of the bunch. if there are a ton of entries in a contest, then i think letting everyone vote would fair.

kench

make me a moderator and i will do what they do best, slacking.

texas

#9
votes without good explanations shouldnt be counted
like
there should be a topic for just the drawings, then, once the contest is over, a topic for just reviews of peoples favorite drawings
and each review should be in depth and different aspects should be judged
since something that is well-drawn isnt always necessarily creative

and if theres a tie it can go in to some drawing battle tiebreaker round between the two artists

also there needs to be a group of people who discuss and vote on good contest ideas that are creative but not too limiting

oh and to prevent one person like bizarrecube from winning every time, the person who won the last contest shouldnt be able to enter the contest right after that

shitturtle

why not just have it there as an excuse to be productive?

rtil

i like some of those ideas kian. but how about the person who last won can enter the next one, but can't win, and reviews for drawings don't have to be in-depth, but should at least provide a reason to go with them?

texas

yeah youre right
those would be better
since if reviews were in depth there would be a lot less people who would take the time to do it

psi43

pretty much what kian said +rtil's additions

rtil

so the verdict on judges is pretty mixed but i'm leaning towards everyone. any objections?

Greenkitten

Quote from: rtilany objections?



jjjjjjjjjj

Quote from: rtilso the verdict on judges is pretty mixed but i'm leaning towards everyone. any objections?

votes without good explanations shouldnt be counted
or
if its gonna be with judges i'd say pick nonbias members or whatever

psi43

Quote from: rtilso the verdict on judges is pretty mixed but i'm leaning towards everyone. any objections?

well either that or only people who entered
problem with ppl who entered would be; there might just be like 2-3 ppl entering then it's really stupid to vote


mishkamash

i say everyone wins
<lenko> i saw a hedgehog on the way home if i was drunk i would have yelled IM DOCTOR RRRRROBOTNIK and chased it