question about copyrights and money

Started by psi43, February 12, 2009 08:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

psi43

I've been wondering about something in the past few days (minutes actually).

You are allowed to use copyrighted characters in your flashes or art or whatever as long as you don't make money with it, right. And it is also allowed to make sprite flashes as long as money isn't involved.

Well Alvin Earthworm for example did win $250 for some of his mario ball z episodes, so wouldn't that pretty much break the copyright?

He earned money with sprites drawn and animated by other people, wouldn't nintendo and sega get a fair split of the money (if they were interested I mean. I don't think that they really wanted that $50).

just wondering
and here's a super funny gif

Cornmander

Probably, but it'd be pretty petty.

funzop


lenko

did the original animating staff of space ghost get money?

did the original film studio who made the 'actual' film that Kung Pow is based on get money?

<emanhattan> i remember pingu ice cream
<emanhattan> it was a better time
<emanhattan> when the penguins were cold and delicious
<emanhattan> and i knew i was gonna be
<emanhattan> consequence free

Gmagnum

#4
this post has been removed
i'm really sorry about all my stupidity on this forum.
i didn't know what i was talking about and was an asshole.
so i take back all of this as it no longer represents me.
i was unable to remove the posts in the locked threads.

funzop


rtil

because it's non-taxable money that newgrounds is essentially giving away instead of a salary, i think it's fair use. now sponsorship, ad revenue and dvd sales are a whole other ball game. buuuuuuut video game companies would be stupid to pursue it because it's not  taking away from their buying audience. in other words, shitty video game tributes on newgrounds don't steal sales from the actual games

Flash

they've started treating copyrights like they treat shitty creative commons licenses oh no


ansel

essentially either nintendo lets faggots make money from shitty sprite movies, or they do not. The total revenue for them from these movies remains the same: zero dollars. They don't give a shit and at this point neither do i

Quote from: Factoryshut up you skinny white ugly prick

funzop


DrRumack

Quote from: hi
thats a super cute gif





idiot

<Naza> i hate penis exect mine
<Tyler Naugle> JOKE  TIME w/ JOKEOB BRECK
<+pantsman> you have yet to show me any applicable sign of intelligence yet scrib...
<HatsuneMiku> the pings and timeouts of jacob breck
<dilly> the tba will look up and cry "save us!".... and i'll look down and whisper .... "h"
Quote from: stealth trollwhat's up with you not sucking dicks like the faggot you are
<+fluffkomix> mrscriblam has added you as a friend
<+fluffkomix> ignore

<+mrscriblam> lmao

Blordow

i dont think nintendo and all the others could really give a fuck to be honest


Kött

#14
Well, maybe not Alvin Erthworm... but definitely Randy Solem with his vgdc shitsite that gives you malware... I'm pretty sure that this guy's site is a solid source of income...
Still, I think no one from Nintendo would ever give two fucks because the stuff he produces makes even more people to custumers of them... which actually is sad...

Oh, ye... almost forgot it: <image remvoed>
:3

psi43

this topic wasn't about "does nintendo and sega give a shit" it was "is it legal". I know that they don't give a shit and I even said it myself, no need to keep repeating that.

funzop


funzop


funzop


funzop