Frozen

bd648 · February 23, 2014 03:03 PM

that by itself was entertaining

ZennyPLUS · February 24, 2014 08:45 AM

Just go see it, if you don't like it, you wasted a good 12 dollar that you could have bought with porn. oh well.

But it's actually a good film. Top notch animation from Disney, also the Internet gets this vibe that the ice queen's song is somewhat gay, as in the homosexual tendencies kind of way. I guess it's a gay happy movie too. In one word to describe this film it would be.

gay

rtil · February 24, 2014 08:55 AM

i'll wait until i randomly tune in halfway through it on tv in a year

BluPhoenix · February 24, 2014 04:12 PM

Quote from: ZennyPLUS on February 24, 2014 08:45 AM
also the Internet gets this vibe that the ice queen's song is somewhat gay, as in the homosexual tendencies kind of way. I guess it's a gay happy movie too. In one word to describe this film it would be.

gay

JasonDog · February 25, 2014 02:43 AM

Why u men watching Disney have you not heard of Akira and Heavy Metal?

rtil · February 25, 2014 02:57 AM

why can't we watch both?

BluPhoenix · February 25, 2014 03:13 AM

Quote from: JasonDog on February 25, 2014 02:43 AM
Why u men watching Disney have you not heard of Akira and Heavy Metal?

because we have seen them already

Bamyasi · February 25, 2014 05:14 AM

Quote from: Bamyasi on December 4, 2013 11:08 PM
So I guess snowbody else thaw it.

Can't believe I didn't see this. I'm such a flake.

Also has anyone else seen the original Lev Atamanov version? How do you think this compares?

Sinitron · February 25, 2014 06:10 AM

Quote from: BluPhoenix on February 25, 2014 03:13 AM
Quote from: JasonDog on February 25, 2014 02:43 AM
Why u men watching Disney have you not heard of Akira and Heavy Metal?

because we have seen them already

of all things i'm actually curious about the supposed disney star wars movie

lucas kind of lost it on his old days, it can only get better

JasonDog · February 25, 2014 10:36 PM

J. J. Abrams isn't very creative.
What makes you think it will be different from his Star Trek movies?

crackers · February 25, 2014 10:44 PM

You were the chosen one JJ! It was said that you would save the franchise, not ruin it! You were to bring balance to the force, not leave it in darkness.

rtil · February 25, 2014 10:51 PM

Quote from: JasonDog on February 25, 2014 10:36 PM
J. J. Abrams isn't very creative.
What makes you think it will be different from his Star Trek movies?

it doesn't really matter though, does it? he's not the writer, he's in charge of directing. and he can direct exciting family action/adventure sci-fi flicks that people will go see. hell, he made Star Trek bankable to general audiences. Star Trek is supposed to be for nerds. he can easily do it for Star Wars.

zwimmy · February 25, 2014 11:11 PM

lel

FROZEN - New Trailer

JasonDog · February 25, 2014 11:31 PM

Isn't SW's success due to its visuals and not its writing? As far as I can remember they never even explained what was wrong about the dark side of the force.
I didn't actually check its writers, they do look competent so hopefully they will produce a shooting script.

As for ST being a success, of course it was. He stripped it of everything but its brand and churned out an all guns blazing blockbuster. It would take a company like HBO to make something resembling the original show a success now.

rtil · February 25, 2014 11:37 PM

well then isn't jj abrams a pretty good choice, then? he can make a visually compelling film.

the dark side of the force was giving into anger and hatred, which, according to them, allows you to be more powerful while sacrificing some part of your humanity. at least that's what i got from it.

the magic was ruined when lucas made up that shit about midichlorians. no one gives a fuck about that

JasonDog · February 25, 2014 11:51 PM

I think he is a safe choice, and it will be a success.
Look, I don't know much about film criticism but has he produced anything quirky or anything similar to the quality of Star Wars: A new Hope and Empire strikes back? Although the earlier SW films were blockbusters, the producers and directors at that time weren't steeped in that genre, they were passionate about the A-list and B-list films they grew up with and emulated their style towards what we know as the birth of the blockbuster today: Jaws, Indiana, SW ect.

Isn't there a lot of other decent directors around that seemingly have a lot of passion for the art of the blockbuster? Jackson, Duncan Jones, Nolan, Guillermo del toro. All of these are safe choices too, it's not like I'm asking for Terry Gilliam or M.Night.Shyamalan.

rtil · February 26, 2014 12:11 AM

i don't see why jj wouldn't have passion for sci-fi blockbuster considering that he took on Trek. i'm sure it will turn out much better than Lucas' last three attempts.

zwimmy · February 26, 2014 12:46 AM

Jedi = celibate, no fun allowed
Sith = stay up late, fuck bitches

Gilthwixt · February 26, 2014 08:53 AM

Leave it to Sinitron to derail a thread into some completely unrelated argument. He didn't even have to have an opinion this time

JJ Abram's Star Wars will likely be good. I actually really enjoyed his treatment of the Star Trek series (even if Into Darkness was kinda bad, but that might've been the writers' fault). I liked Super 8 and Cloverfield, I feel like he knows how to do Sci-Fi right in the 21st century, which is starting to get pretty rare sadly.

rtil · February 26, 2014 10:13 AM

actually jasondog derailed this thread